The Relationship of Music and Politics

As a type of communication, music has been utilized to convey opinions. Music played with instruments or with soundboards all send out a message during political campaigns.

People sing and some listen to music. There have been lots of tunes and jingles largely, supporting individual candidates and causes, but rather than turn this into a history lesson, we will concentrate on a few of the modern tunes that have formed the musical political climate.

The connection between politics and music has existed for decades, sometimes harmoniously, and sometimes not too much. Historical documents are filled with examples of songs which laud the accomplishments of states, dating all of the way back to early Egypt.

Music at War

The tumult of the sixties has been a direct outcome of a creation born by the coming soldiers of the next World War. The horrors suffered by their own parents turned them contrary to the battle, but after a whole decade of rail from the military industrial complex and unjust wars overseas, a feeling of disillusionment came across the nation and the age of the protest tune gradually faded away.

Music To Voting

A brand new generation realized they could be a portion of the procedure, Together with exactly the message being shared by the most well-known artists of all genres. President Bill Clinton had been chosen, after devoting a massive lead among young voters, thanks, in part, into the National Voter Registration Act, that gave prospective voters a opportunity to enroll when they seen with the Department Of Motor Vehicles.

Music for Political Campaigning

Music is a very important part of every campaign stop. Every facet of an election campaign stop is projected down to the smallest detail. Their handlers plan not exactly what they are likely to say but how they are going to state it, what clothing they will be sporting and what they will be standing facing when they discuss the message.

Legality Behind Astronomy

The physical law becomes the formal training of future scientists in the field of astronomy. In the coming years, astronomers must have to anticipate the kind of law that determines the way of human beings in dealing with each other. However, there are few who consider that the best place to exercise and practice the said law is the outer space. In fact, at the moment anybody or anything move into the outer space, it is our ability to go beyond the higher ground.

These laws will generally affect the human kind. However, it is essential to remember that we must still bend to higher power.

Historical Legislation of Astronomy

The Committee on Peaceful Uses of Outer Space or COPUOS of the United Nations established the legal instrument that inhibits the execution of astronomy. This was the first legal instrument ever used. The birth of this law was dated ten years after the Soviet Union stationed the first artificial satellite in revolution around the planet.

Twelve years after, there are four additional laws that arrived. These were all simplifications or explanations of the substance from the first law. Moreover, all of the five laws are conducted at regulating astronomy on the space in an organized manner like the activities performing by Seeplutonow. Additionally, they were all created with satellites while exploring the solar system.

The Laws of Outer Space

The major objective of all the laws is to perform space activity with the incorporation of global cooperation. This is to give benefit for the general public and to utilize the outer space for peaceful intentions. Below are the titles of the laws that are intended for the outer space.

  1. The Treaty of the Outer Space of 1967
  2. Agreement on the Rescue and Return of 1968
  3. The Convention Liability of 1972
  4. The Convention Registration of 1975
  5. The Agreement of the Moon of 1979

Final Thought

Numerous space laws are created by COPUOS. They are generally associated with satellites specifically designed for use by the civilians, shuttles, and stations within the space. Basically, these laws have a major effect on the performance of space astronomy most of the time. And this may call for on campaign speeches.

Senate Judiciary Hearing on AG Barr: A Great Example of Partisan Politics

The Senate Judiciary Committee hearing last Wednesday, May 01, 2019 in which US Attorney General William Barr wash harshly grilled by Democratic Senators, provided ample proof that partisan politics continues to prevail over matters that required unbiased judgment.

AG Barr was called on to discuss special counsel Mueller’s Report after he released a redacted copy last April 18, 2018. AG Barr though released a 448-page report in which 11% of the text had been redacted. Nearly 40% of the pages released by AG Barr had at least one redaction, comprising well over 900 redacted text blocks in all. The report was divided into 2 volumes:

VOLUME 1 – Mueller’s report on investigations to which a conclusion was reached that there was Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election won by Donald Trump. Such interference is deemed a violation of U.S. criminal law.

VOLUME 2 – Mueller’s report citing instances in which President Trump made attempts to obstruct justice by trying to control the ongoing investigations and by trying to wield his presidential influence on those who refused to abide with his instructions.

What Barr’s Testimony Revealed during the Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing

The overall impression that AG Barr gave is that he viewed Mueller’s report as a condensation of false accusations that Donald Trump was part of the group who were coordinating with the supposed Russian interference. A stance for which he received grilling questions coming mostly from Democratic Senators.

On several occasions, AG Barr asserted that Donald Trump was falsely accused,. It was his defense on why he concluded that the Mueller investigation did not provide enough evidence to support that Trump was in collusion with the alleged Russian interference. He believes that obstruction of justice was not present because Trump was merely acting on his constitutional àuthority to supervise groundless and unfounded proceedings.

Barr’s testimony also revealed that partisan politics was at work since several times during the hearing, and whenever AG Barr fumbled with his answers, Panel Chairman Lindsey Graham (Rep-S.C.) came to Barr’s rescue by saying the Attorney General is being slandered.

Calls for AG Barr’s Resignation after Conclusion of Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing

Democratic Senators Kamala Harris, Elizabeth Warren and Kirsten Gillibrand who are also in the running for president in the 2020 elections, joined other Democrats on calls for AG Barr to resign. The general consensus is that AG William Barr had lied to Congress and therefor not worthy of the trust placed on him as head of the Department of Justice.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (Dem-Ca.) prefers to reserve judgment until after their turn to question AG Barr on Thursday via the House’s Senate Judiciary Committee hearing. Still, Speaker Pelosi opined that after the Senate hearing, AG Barr’s responses and comments do not live up to the standards conforming to an attorney general.