Are Houses of Politicians Always Big

Politicians are never our of the picture when it comes to news and current political events. This is because their job is very crucial in achieving a better world. We often think that since politicians include job wherein they are to handle to country’s money, it involves dirty work especially in third world countries where corruption is very rampant. Regardless of how they work, one thing is certain, they have plenty of money and make sure that their belongings reflect their social status. This had been my assumption until recently when I bumped in to a documentary on the internet about the lifestyle of a politician. For the sake of the politician’s privacy, I will not drop the name because what  is important is something that proved me wrong upon watching the documentary.

As mentioned earlier, most of us probably have a thinking that politicians are making too much money, especially politicians who are in high position – the ones we see in television. One factor that probably affects that way of thinking is the way politicians present themselves – clothing, the way they speak, stand, walk, and a lot more. In addition to that, we often see them in a black SUV, assuming that it is their car  that serves as their service as well. More often that not, they have a driver because they are going to different places every day and driving should not add up as stress or hassle to them. With this, we then assume that they have luxurious lifestyle – grand house and expensive cars.

On the other hand, there may be a lot of politicians who want to live in a life of luxury but there are still some who choose to have simple life. In the documentary that I watched, the house of a certain politician is simple yet it looks very classy because of the interior design, specifically how the walls were painted – colors and details. When the politician was asked who made it. they said that they hired the painters calgary. They offer quality service in affordable rates.

The documentary also features the cars of the politician. Upon watching it, that is only the time when I realized that not all politicians are the same.

California Congress Bans Sale and Rental of Violent Video Games

The California Legislature enacted legislation that violent videogames increase the likelihood that minors will be antisocial or offensive, and minors who do not act violently will suffer psychological damage if they are exposed to violent videogames for a long time.

The Entertainment Software Association and others filed a complaint that the law was unconstitutional, and the US Supreme Court, when the National Assembly passed a mandatory shutdown, made a decision on the law.

Although the law is totally different from the mandatory shutdown system under the Youth Protection Act, this ruling allows us to look at the United States’ view of video games.

Supreme Court Rejects California Video Game Law

Games are protected by freedom of expression

First and foremost in the ruling is the Supreme Court’s judgment that video games are also protected by freedom of expression. If the game could not be protected by freedom of expression in the first place, the problem of freedom of expression would not have arisen from the beginning.

It is controversial whether games are also protected by freedom of expression because the problem of freedom of expression arises mostly in the area of ​​political expression. And this is the same in our country as can be seen in the Minerva, PD notebook, and mouse painting events.

It was a question of whether games could be protected by freedom of expression because games were originally a medium of strong entertainment. The attempt itself was dangerous.

The game’s interaction is nothing new for every medium.

The next thing to notice is the Supreme Court’s decision on whether it’s reasonable to treat violent games differently from other media. Games, unlike other mediums, have the property of an interaction.

In other words, in a video game, the player has an active interaction through the screen (https://www.daretobedigital.com/hardware/best-cpu-for-gaming/) that determines participation in violent behavior. Thus, if such interactions are characteristic of games that do not exist in other media, discrimination against violent games may be justified.

The Supreme Court, however, judged that the game’s interaction was nothing new, especially based on The Adventure of You: Sugar cane Island, published in 1969. These types of novels are later referred to as gamebooks, where the content of the novels depends on the reader’s decision.

In the end, the Supreme Court’s view is that all media are interactive, with varying degrees, and that all media have such characteristics that it is unfair to treat games differently.

There is no causal relationship between game violence and real-world violence

Finally, we need to note that the Supreme Court judged that there was no causal relationship between violent games and violence in the real world.

The Supreme Court found that California’s findings by Dr. Craig Anderson and some psychologists’ arguments that exposure to violent video games have a detrimental effect on children are not valid. In addition, almost all of these studies are based on correlations, not evidence of causation, and found to contain significant, admitted defects in the methodology.

In addition, even though the Supreme Court acknowledges Dr. Anderson’s findings that violent video games make children more aggressive, these effects are very small and indistinguishable from those from other media.

Every society has different legal standards. And if the legal system of a particular country is based on scientific evidence and established by rational decision-making, it will not be a problem because it is different from that of other countries.

Spreading Politics And Political Propaganda On YouTube And Social Media

Creating your own channel on YouTube and uploading videos in it could be an efficient and effective avenue to advertise and promote a product or service, an event, or yourself as well. However, getting views and thumbs-ups on a video is one thing, but having viewers to really subscribe and support your channel is a different thing. Between both, the latter determines more how influential you and your channel is since subscribing to your channel means viewers are looking forward t more videos from you. This is one reason why owners of a YouTube channel who are only starting opt to buy youtube subscribers.

The Prevalence of YouTube

YouTube is a place where you could find an extensive category of videos, from health and wellness, beauty and fashion tips, music videos, movie trailers, home videos to DIY projects, the list just goes on and on.

YouTube as well as YouTube stars over the years have increasingly become more immersed, involved and participative in the political environment even roping in the younger generation, from interviews and dialogues with political figures to political debates on political issues.

Politics and YouTube

In each local and nationwide election, the source of great and deep influence is propaganda. However as technology evolves, propaganda is also compelled to evolve alongside it. TV ads, digital banners and signs, computerized visuals and graphics as well as campaigns on social media have more and more become widespread and mainstream throughout the political field especially in the U.S. where their presence dominates every single form of media particularly as the Election Day approaches. This puts much responsibility on YouTube which is one of the leading and influential media platforms.

In a period shaped by the digital revolution, wherein information has transformed into a commodity that is easily and effortlessly accessible through handheld electronic devices as well as the usage of the web and internet, collecting political data ad info has practically become uncomplicated.

For the most part because of the popularity and dominance of social media, propaganda was streamlined and modified to match wide-ranging demographics as well as to reach every single part of the globe. YouTube, the widely used website for video sharing across the world, hosts thousands and thousands of videos that are barely censored as well as politically charged, which are shared and circulated on other platforms of media, disseminating their message at a pace that is extremely fast.

Why Footwear is Important to Every Politician

Every time we see a politician, we often assume that they are more of a serious type of person. Why would we think that way? Why is there a prejudgment like that? One of the possible reasons for that is how politicians dress up. Seeing them wearing casual clothes, especially those in high position, is very rare. We often see them in formal clothes – in a plain top and skirt, and a formal polo. Hence, assuming that they are very serious type of people on cam and off cam.

There are actually lots of politician that do not wholeheartedly like dressing up in formal, but since their job require them to look professional, well they have no choice. They have to embrace the image of a politician which is, an intelligent and professional looking individual.

If you will notice, female politicians dress do not really differ. They just have a color and style to use. Most of the time, female politicians wear a plain blouse with sleeve, it can be without sleeve as long as she is wearing a blazer or a coat. Then for the lower body, a black skirt or pants. We rarely see a politician wearing a pair jeans because it will look too casual.

Although it seems like most politician give more attention to their clothes, footwear actually makes a huge different to their overall look. It can either make or break it. A politician can just simply wear a plain white blouse and black pants looking basic. However, if she choose to wear a black boots from MyBestWorkBoots, it will make her look more professional and sophisticated. Another thing with wearing boots is that compared to other footwear with heel, it feels more comfortable to wear. Moreover, it also protects our feet.

As for male politicians, it is actually much easier to decide what to wear. As long as they wear plain polo and a black or dark blue slacks, then they are good to wear. As for their footwear, black plain closed shoes will be fine.

Architect-Politicians from the Modern History

The majority of the architect’s working hours have been spent coordinating people’s attempts to bring about a whole that is greater than the components they’re currently providing particularly when creating modern buildings or establishments. In building modern establishments, polished concrete in Gold Coast AU is one of the materials used.  Here is a rundown of architect-politicians from history that illustrate, as a reminder of this effect being an architect may have on public company. In the improvement of housing to war crimes’ perpetration, the profession’s participation in politics has had both negative and positive results on the entire world. For the fledgling architect-politicians of today, the challenge of the future will probably be building on the positive elements of this background.

James Goold Cutler

His own participation shows the impact architects could have on politics – although cutler’s time in office had been – he had been the mayor of Rochester, New York for three years. He was best known for inventing the mail chute. That the work of an architect-politician integrates both community business and an innovative solution to buildings speaks into the program the abilities of a designer may have in government.

Margarete Schütte-Lihotzky

By opting to engage in a career in any respect already a leader in her day, Margarete Lihotzky was the first girl in Austria. Her public service began in the 1920s when she had been hired by the town of Frankfurt to style a mission that resulted in her creation of this Frankfurt Kitchen – the precedent for version kitchens, employee home. Her participation lasted throughout the 1930s and 40s, as she aided the opposition to the movement by establishing exiled Europeans lines of communication, although she never held office.

Mir-Hossein Mousavi

A winner for democracy in his native Iran, Mousavi is best called that nation’s last Prime Minister prior to the office has been dissolved and also for operating from Mahmoud Ahmadinejad at an extremely contested presidential elections. However he’s been busy, his places have a tendency to catch more attention than his job as an architect. His job was proven to mingle styles with interpretations, although as a pupil, he specialized in traditional architecture.

Harvey Gantt

Prior to serving two terms and exemplifying a combination of an educational background in architecture and town planning Harvey Gantt served in the city council of Carolina. Despite two following attempts for the U.S. Senate, he managed to run a flourishing architecture practice. Reflective of a tendency toward public support, his design work has concentrated on educational and civic buildings, with a focus on consensus among the communities.

Women’s Right To Learn, Work, And Choose

For so many years, women from all over the world had no voice and come only secondary to the male specie. Even in this generation when we thought the world has accepted gender equality, there are still instances of discrimination to women. Women were usually thought to be just good for cleaning and baby sitting, this is no longer true. Women can now build an empire as to where they are good at and it’s not just an empire for gebäudereinigung aachen und umgebung but an empire that could change the world.

The Revolution of 1848

During the revolution of 1848, women fought for their interests for the first time. It is the beginning of emancipation in Germany.

Your weapon is the words. Louise Otto began to write as a young woman – and sometimes she uses a male pseudonym to accept her texts. “The participation of women in the interests of the state is not only a right, but it is also a duty of women,” she wrote in the Saxon Fatherland Gazette in 1843. With sentences like this, she becomes a pioneer of the bourgeois women’s movement.

It is the middle-class women who began to fight for their rights in the 1830s and 1840s. They want to be able to learn more and they want to work. They are not allowed to do both at this time. In poor families, it goes without saying that girls and women work – families need their labor and money. For daughters from wealthy and educated families, there is only one option: life alongside a rich man.

Women like Louise Otto want more than that. When the political situation was publicly criticized across the country in the 1840s, women also demanded reforms. Many support the revolution of 1848/49: They sit in the stands in the Paulskirche in Frankfurt, help their politically active men – and fight vigorously themselves. For the first time, women are also doing something for their own interests.

During the revolution of 1848/49, women did something for their own interests for the first time.

The revolution fails. But Louise Otto remains active. In 1849 she founded the Frauen-Zeitung in Leipzig, which became an important medium for women because of politics. In 1850 , Saxony prohibited women from publishing newspapers – the law is known as “Lex Otto”. She moves to Thuringia and continues to work on her newspaper for two years until she is also banned from working there.

The voices of women cannot stop publication bans. In addition to Louise Otto, other women’s rights activists became popular after 1848: Helene Lange fought for better education, the socialist Clara Zetkin for the workers and the theoretician Hedwig Dohm called for women’s right to vote as early as 1873. In 1865, 120 women met in Leipzig for a conference and founded the General German Women’s Association.

In 1918 women were given the right to vote and to vote – and they used both a year later. Around 90 percent voted in 1919; Ten percent of the members of the newly elected parliament are women. There you will find majorities for important laws: maternity leave, minimum wages for homeworkers, more rights for prostitutes.

They did not achieve any other goal: in 1931, many women – but also men – fought for the reform of paragraph 218 of the Criminal Code. This is true since 1871 and punished a termination of pregnancy up to five years in prison. You have no success. The paragraph was only reformed more than 40 years later.

When the Nazis came to power in 1933, the success of the women’s movement was lost. In the dictatorship, women have only one task: to be a mother – and to support the man.