You are on an individual archive page

Click here to return to the main page


Wikipedia does good things. Reward them.

The Daily Links Page
Got a link to submit?
  • New Evidence Proves First Flag Made By Betsy Ross Actually Shirt For Gay Friend
  • Colbert Leads Huntsman in S.C.
  • Polish prosecutor 'shoots self after news conference'
  • Jim Rome leaving ESPN. Bonus: Footage of Jim Rome getting attacked by Jim Everett & crying like a baby
  • Broncos, Tim Tebow stun Steelers in OT, win 29-23 in NFL playoffs
       [ 2 comments ]
  • Video: Remember 2008
       [ 1 comment ]
  • Beezow Doo-Doo Zopittybop-Bop-Bop faces weapon and drug charges
  • Video: Green Bay anchorman loves lamp
  • Video: Rodgers & Raji in the new Discount Double Check ad
  • Jim Rome: out of The Jungle and onto the (horse) farm
  • New IL Law Requires Photo ID To Buy Drain Cleaner
  • Fawn Cuddles Kitten, Hearts Explode
  • The priest who changed the course of history for the worse... by rescuing four-year-old Hitler from drowning in icy river
  • Get Fit or Get Fined: Web Service Offers to Charge You for Skipping the Gym
  • Fine proposed for botching US national anthem
  • Why Best Buy is Going out of Business...Gradually
       [ 1 comment ]
  • Edina boutique takes heat for trashing $4,000-plus gowns
  • Law Student Goes 'Homeless by Choice' Touts Value of Gym Club Membership
  • VIDEO: Snoop Dogg on 'The Price Is Right'
  • Flynn and Out
       [ 3 comments ]
  • Don't put Bielema on the firing line
       [ 1 comment ]
  • Your end of the season Vikings comment thread
       [ 2 comments ]
  • Mass. budget motel fights forfeiture by feds
  • Vikings scrutinize downtown Mpls. stadium site near basilica
       [ 2 comments ]
  • Kelly Clarkson criticized on Twitter after singer endorses Ron Paul for President 
  • Political Predictions for 2012
  • We're All Doing The Best We Can
  • Video Of Little Girl Getting Pissed Off About Pink Toys Will Make Your Heart Swell
  • The 10 best sports-related Hitler Reactions of 2011
  • Happy Endings on the housing crisis
  • Why You Just Got New York Times Spam
  • There Will Be No Friday This Week In Samoa
  • The Most Hipster State In The US
  • Online Merchants Home in on Imbibing Consumers
       [ 1 comment ]
  • On islamic fashion
       [ 1 comment ]
  • Sears as Lampert's 'Mismanaged Asset' Loses Customers to Macy's
       [ 1 comment ]
  • 5 social network predictions for 2012
  • Cheetah, chimp star of classic Tarzan movies, dies at 80
  • The Hottest Things on TV in 2011
  • Beer in cans: It's not just for Bud anymore
  • Seven Packers earn Pro Bowl selections
  • The Worst Angry Christmas Tweets In the World
       [ 2 comments ]
  • Minnesota cities try to hold back on rented housing
  • Why Iowa Shouldn't Vote First Anymore
  • Some Falcons Players Upset Drew Brees Went For The Record Last Night
  • We've Identified Jilted Packergirl
  • With its 'W' initiative, ESPN tries to solve the equation of serving women sports fans
       [ 2 comments ]
  • Owner surprised to find cat regularly catches bus
  • Charles Barkley: Skip Bayless Has Surpassed Peter Vecsey As The Biggest Jackass In The History Of Journalism
  • Handicapping the 2011 NFL MVP Race, 2.0

     

  • FOX NEWS Misleads with security story

       August 02, 2004

    Check out this FOX NEWS story entitled "Financial Sites on Guard in D.C., N.Y. Area." See those pictures there in the little box labeled "photos?" It contains a photo of the IMF building in Washington, DC.:

    Clicking on the image to zoom in reveals a full size photo, along with a caption:

    After viewing this picture and its caption, you might think to yourself, "That's great, I'm glad that the police are securing the IMF in the wake of this heightened security level. In fact, I'm glad that they're securing that big open lot, too, because big, open lots are top targets of terrorists."

    Let me let you in on a little secret, though: FOX news is misleading you. That picture is, like they state in the caption, a photo of Police securing the IMF building. (or, more accurately, the once barren lot in front of it.) But guess what? That picture wasnt taken any time within the past year. See that big open lot? There is a big fat BUILDING there now. They've been building it for the last 3 years!

    I suspected that the picture was taken during one of the many IMF "protests" in Washington, DC, because that's the only time that I've ever seen police standing around that open lot, and it turns out I was right - I went to google image search and did a search for "IMF building," and, wouldn't you know it, that picture popped up on CNN, in a story about some IMF protests from years past.

    Same Photo, on CNN, for an IMF protest story. Found at ttp://www.cnn.com/interactive/us/0209/gallery.imf.protest/0.imf.protestap.jpg

    As far as I've seen, there has been absolutely no increase in police presence around the IMF.

    So, was FOX NEWS just too lazy to send a photographer from their studio roughly 10 blocks away to take a picture? Or did they do that, but decide not to run the pictures from today because they weren't sensationalist enough?


    Posted by jkhat at August 2, 2004 10:26 AM

        The trackback entry for this page is : http://www.inthehat.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/286

     

    Trackback Entries
      Dummocrats.com linked with FOX NEWS Misleads with security story (breaking news by dummocrats.com)

     


    Comments

    #  March 7th, 2005 6:48 PM      Converted_Comment
    Converted comment: Posted by: at August 2, 2004 02:55 PM

    Just a guess.... given that fairly heavy rain is covering most of the DC area at the moment, I'd say it's reasonable to assume that they couldn't get a decent photo today.


     
     
    #  March 7th, 2005 6:48 PM      Converted_Comment
    Converted comment: Posted by: kris at August 2, 2004 02:59 PM

    that's a weak excuse. you're telling me we can send photographers into battle, but not out into the rain?

    in any case, it still doesn't make the photo any less misleading. if they couldn't get a new picture they should have captioned what they had to make it clear it was and old photo.

     
     
    #  March 7th, 2005 6:48 PM      Converted_Comment
    Converted comment: Posted by: jkhat at August 2, 2004 03:17 PM

    first, it wasnt raining all morning.

    next, it wasnt raining when they posted the picture.

    next, it wasnt raining yesterday afternoon when i went out and took pictures of the crack security efforts. (which are non-existent)

    and, finally, rain or shine, it's 100% misleading.

    sorry, i dont think that your reasonable assumption is all that reasonable.

     
     
    #  March 7th, 2005 6:48 PM      Converted_Comment
    Converted comment: Posted by: Bithead at August 6, 2004 11:52 AM

    No, I'm suggesting when it's raining the light is a little harder to work with.


    and I'm not making excuses, I'm simply exploring alternative explanations.

    One other that occurs to me;
    How to show the general image, without showing the current security arrangements, thus allowing attckers to use the pics for their own intel?

    Hmmm. A file shot....

    (shrug)


     
     

     

     


      page rendered in 0.0689 seconds | ©2004, 2005 Dummocrats.com