Daily Page | Zebrality | NCAA Pool | General Chat | Latest Comments

You are on an individual archive page

Click here to return to the main page


Wikipedia does good things. Reward them.

The Daily Links Page
Got a link to submit?
  • Harry Reid: Dubya is 'worst president' for trying to save us from fiscal oblivion
  • Team Obama: Richardson misled us
  • Minnesota canvassing board expected to say that Democrat Al Franken is winner in Senate race
  • Obama Wants 600,000 More Bureaucrats
  • Senora Kennedy Is Make Very Good Senator
  • Holiday Sales Drop to Force Bankruptcies, Closings
  • Humorous Reminders of Common Writing Mistakes
  • Yellowstone Gets very Quakey
       [ 1 comment ]
  • Your 2009 Horoscope
  • Bush Sr. wants Jeb as president
  • Huffington Poster Rips Gore, Global Warming
  • Is living in a city bad for your brain?
  • Report: Patriots will use franchise tag on Matt Cassel
  • Thousands of shoes tie up Miami freeway traffic
  • Jones: Favre's play warranted benching
  • A Russian's take on how the US will split up by 2010
  • Group Wants 50% Hike in Gas Taxes
  • 6 reasons why no one is making catty comments about Caroline Kennedy's looks
  • Senate Dems May Physically Bar Burris From Entering Senate
  • EXCLUSIVE: RNC draft rips Bush's bailouts
  • Capitol offense: Building's in Madison, but skyline's in Minneapolis
  • Isn't 'Happy Holidays' a form of suicide bombing, too?
  • Dictator Stalin voted third-greatest Russian
  • Compilation of 2008's Top Movies Lists
  • The Seven Best Capers of 2008
  • Sheepshead
       [ 1 comment ]
  • 2008 Was the Beginning of the End for the Global Warming Hoax
  • Liberals start to feel the pain of liberalism
  • Man allegedly hides in bathroom, robs restaurant, spends loot at strip club
  • Bielema is in over his head and dragging the UW program into the ground.
  • Stray cat colony takes care of homeless baby
  • The Good News about the Bailouts
       [ 1 comment ]
  • Snowzilla Returns!
  • What If New York Goes Bust?
  • Great Moments in Local Government
  • Obama 'repressing inner geek'
  • Is Tammy Baldwin selling out the gay community?
  • Christmas Is Now An Official Holiday In...Iraq
  • Seattle refuses to use salt, resulting in 1800 miles of skating rink
       [ 2 comments ]
  • Why Obama Really Might Decriminalize Marijuana
  • Fourth Amendment Rights in Numbers Dialed Stored Inside a Cell Phone
  • Festivus for the rest of us
  • Companies That Won't Make It Through 2009
  • Franken Up By 48 Ballots With Most Counted
  • Good Argument for Tax Havens
  • CBS Seems To Think That Jamarcus Russell Is A Bald, White Kicker
  • Judge backs secrecy on Zimmermann 911 call
  • Beer goggles last longer for women
  • Congress Gives Itself a Raise In Midst of a Recession
  • Looks first, knowledge later

     

  • What's in a (Big) name?

       August 05, 2004

    All the "stars" are aligning for Kerry. And, they're going on the road to provide concerts to support the campaign. Professor Alan Schroeder thinks this is a problem for Bush.

    But why? Is it a brand new revelation that most celebrities are Democrats, leftists, commies and worse? Of course not. Americans already know who Bruce Springsteen or John Cougar Mellencamp is going to vote for. And we already don't want to listen to them talk about it.

    Why fear that this wave of celebrity endorsements and action is suddenly going to turn the tide of the election? The common model isn't celebrities speak-nation follows. It's celebrities speak-nation rolls its eyes. At best, we really don't care about how celebrities feel about politics. At worst, these celebrities will get a very negative reaction to their words. Do the names Linda Ronstadt, Whoopi Goldeberg and the Dixie Chicks ring a bell?

    Americans, for all of our faults, aren't complete idiots. We know the Sean Penn isn't a statesman. We know Bruce Springsteen isn't an economist. We know that Dave Mathews isn't a teacher. For the most part, all these celebrities have is a high school education, a burning need for attention and too much time on their hands.

    People will point to the 1992 election and Clinton's saxophone playing and appearance on MTV as proof that politicians can successfully reach younger voters through popular culture. But I think that case is completely different. Clinton succeeded because he personally could engage those voters. Kerry can't engage anyone other than wealthy women. That's why he's looking to Hollywood to do his dirty work for him.


    Posted by kris at August 5, 2004 01:03 PM

        The trackback entry for this page is : http://www.inthehat.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/294

     

    Trackback Entries

     


    Comments

    #  March 7th, 2005 6:48 PM      Converted_Comment
    Converted comment: Posted by: Interested-Participant at August 11, 2004 05:31 PM

    Every poll and every pundit regale us with the fact that the country is divided down the middle, half Republican and half Democrat. Oddly, Hollywood doesn't stack up that way. I wonder why.

     
     

     

     


    To leave a comment you must be logged in.
    Log in here
    or Get an Account here.