Daily Page | Zebrality | NCAA Pool | General Chat | Latest Comments

You are on an individual archive page

Click here to return to the main page


The Daily Links Page
Got a link to submit?
  • As pledged, Mangini gives son middle name Brett in QB's honor
  • What Is a Right and How Do We Know?
  • Wisconsin band to play on
  • ACORN Files Voting Rights Suit on Behalf of Imaginary-Americans
  • Would Women Hate Sarah Palin If She Was A Liberal?
  • Litigating the 4th Amendment in the Supreme Court
  • State polling update 10/10
  • McCain Resurgence Plan
  • James Brown On The Differences Between Working At Fox And CBS
  • The Warped Mind Of A Teachers Union Boss
  • More Voter Registration Shenanigans: Indianapolis Has 105% Of Its Population Registered To Vote
  • Brett Favre Pranks Teammate With Dead Animal
  • ACORN Offices Raided in Las Vegas
  • So What's All This About Guantanamo Bay Detainees Being Released into the United States?
  • Lehman Brothers CEO Got Punched In The Face
  • McCain would buy bad homeowner mortgages
       [ 5 comments ]
  • UW band suspended, won't play Saturday's Ohio State game
  • Upset fantasy football player arrested for allegedly threatening to kill roommate
  • Madison burglars say they owe it all to the Discovery Channel
  • Charged as kid in Young slaying, man, 19, now accused in robbery
  • Congress Clears Hotly Contested Bailout Bill
  • Former GOP Congressman's 1996 Prognostication a Tough Reminder
  • WI appeals court throws out drunk driving conviction for man with .259 blood-alcohol content
  • Before That Sex Change, Think About Your Next Paycheck
  • The Obama channel
       [ 1 comment ]
  • Flirting with Palin earns Pakistani president a fatwa
  • Walgreens pulls display of cups, pingpong balls
  • Audio: 'Going, Going, Braun'
  • McCain turns irritable, sarcastic in interview
       [ 3 comments ]
  • Who should throw out the first pitch in Saturday's Brewers game?
  • We Need to Recapitalize the Banks
       [ 3 comments ]
  • The spark that could ignite a revolution
  • Somali Pirates Tell All: They're in It for the Money
  • NFL bust Mandarich says he used steroids at Michigan State
  • Wisconsin man to stand trial for allegedly damaging girlfriend's vehicle
  • Community Organizers for Bad Mortgages
  • It's snowing on Mars
  • House rejects $700B bailout
  • Brewers fans cheer, drink, shop
       [ 3 comments ]
  • Report: 60 Million People You'd Never Talk To Voting For Other Guy
  • EU climate goals under pressure as recession looms
  • George Bush: The Comeback Kid
  • Brewers fans admit they've 'never felt this feeling'
       [ 1 comment ]
  • Video: What's Brewin'
       [ 8 comments ]
  • The week in baseball: Sept. 20-26, 1982
  • Presidential Children Don't Belong in Battle
  • Improving the inevitable big bailout
  • Gov. Blunt Statement on Obama Campaign's Abusive Use of Missouri Law Enforcement
  • Paul Newman Dies at 83
  • Video: Handing out some bailout blame

     

  • The First Amendment doesn't protect disorderly conduct

       September 28, 2004

    The Washington Post reports that a woman was arrested for talking too loudly on her cell phone. Despite the fact that they set it up as a "free speech" issue, especially with their oh-so-clever and whimsical headline "For Metro, a Case of Too-Free Speech," nothing could be farther from the truth.

    A brief background, some of which I've edited to remove the WaPo's clever re-casting of the story:

    (not a direct quote)
    Sakinah Aaron was walking into the bus area at the Wheaton Metro station talking loudly on her Motorola cell phone.

    Officer George Saoutis of the Metro Transit Police told Aaron to lower her voice.

    She told the officer he had no right to tell her how to speak into her cell phone.

    Their verbal dispute quickly escalated, and Saoutis grabbed Aaron by the arm and pushed her to the ground. He handcuffed the 23-year-old woman, called for backup and took her to a cell where she was held for three hours before being released to her aunt.

    She was charged with two misdemeanors: "disorderly manner that disturbed the public peace" and resisting arrest.

    OK, so the woman was behaving obnoxiously, disorderly, if you will, and when asked to stop, she bascially told the cop "f-you, I can do whatever I want!" Unfortunately for Ms. Aaron, she was wrong about that.

    Of course, the WaPo doesn't report this as a disorderly conduct case; instead, they try to frame the issue as if somehow disorderly conduct is a constitutionally protected right. They even cite an ACLU director:

    Johnny Barnes, executive director of the Washington area chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union, called Aaron's arrest "troubling."

    "There seems to be an unusual attention paid to activities of patrons," Barnes said. "One should be able to ride the Metro and exercise a range of rights without fear of intervention from Metro police."

    Yes, Mr. Barnes, one should be able to exercise a "broad range of rights" while riding metro. The problem with your argument is that disorderly conduct is not a right, disturbing the peace is not a right, dosobeying a lawful order from a police officer is not a right, and resisting arrest is not a right.

    What Ms. Aaron did is akin to walking into a Wal-Mart with a megaphone, then insisting that "free speech" protects her actions. That's ridiculous. Almost as ridiculous as WaPo's attempt to manufacture "outrage" over this incident.


    Posted by jkhat at September 28, 2004 01:41 AM

        The trackback entry for this page is : http://www.inthehat.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/429

     

    Trackback Entries

     


    Comments

    #  March 7th, 2005 6:48 PM      Converted_Comment
    Converted comment: Posted by: kris at September 28, 2004 08:08 AM

    Excellent points. Too often people think freedom of speech means freedom of speech without consequences.

     
     
    #  March 7th, 2005 6:48 PM      Converted_Comment
    Converted comment: Posted by: billman at September 29, 2004 03:12 PM

    I agree! What's with this "exercise a range of rights..." nonsense? Shouldn't I be able to ride the Metro without having to listen to some idiot scream obscenities right next to me (while I sit in ketchup)?

     
     

     

     


    To leave a comment you must be logged in.
    Log in here
    or Get an Account here.