Dem Poll workers told to allege voter intimidation, even if none exists

Drudge has the bombshell story of the week. It seems that the DNC is telling their poll workers to allege voting irregularities even where none exist, and on top of that, they're getting ready to trot out the "minority leadership" to lend creedence to the very allegations that they're directing their staffers to fabricate.
XXXXX DRUDGE REPORT XXXXX THU OCT 14, 2004 10:58:04 ET XXXXXDNC ELECTION MANUAL: CHARGE VOTER INTIMIDATION, EVEN IF NONE EXISTS
**World Exclusive**
The Kerry/Edwards campaign and the Democratic National Committee are advising election operatives to declare voter intimidation -- even if none exists, the DRUDGE REPORT can reveal.
A 66-page mobilization plan to be issued by the Kerry/Edwards campaign and the Democratic National Committee states: "If no signs of intimidation techniques have emerged yet, launch a 'pre-emptive strike.'"
[HIGHLIGHT OF ELECTION DAY MANUAL, NOVEMBER 2004. CLICK FOR IMAGE .JPG FILE]
The provocative Dem battle plan is to be distributed in dozens of states, the DRUDGE REPORT has learned.
One top DNC official confirmed the manual's authenticity, but claimed the notion of crying wolf on any voter intimidation is "absurd."
"We all know the Republicans are going to try to steal the election by scaring people and confusing people," the top DNC source explained.
Developing...

Not only are these slimeballs telling their poll workers to allege intimidation even where none exists, but they are telling them to use "minority leaders" to lend creedence to and promote these lies. My god, I can't think of a more blatantly racist tactic - ":et's see," say top Dems, "How can we use the black man today? How can minorities be useful to us?"
I am beyond disgusted. Why people continue to vote for these power hungry self-aggrandizing, racist liars and cheats completely escapes me.
Posted by jkhat at October 14, 2004 02:39 PM
The trackback entry for this page is : http://www.inthehat.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/468
| Trackback Entries |
Comments
| # March 7th, 2005 6:48 PM Converted_Comment | |
are you so blindly partisan that you dont believe this crap goes both ways? dont try to justify the accusations against republicans. its politics. its dirty. its ugly. both sides are dirty.
|
| # March 7th, 2005 6:48 PM Converted_Comment | |
dont be so self righteous for crying out loud. CONCORD, N.H. — President Bush's New England campaign chairman stepped down Friday after the Democrats accused him of taking part in the jamming of their telephone lines on Election Day 2002. Get-out-the-vote phones run by Democrats and the nonpartisan Manchester firefighters union were jammed on Election Day two years ago by more than 800 computer-generated hang-up calls. The calls tied up the phones for 11/2 hours. Last summer, Chuck McGee, former executive director of the state GOP, pleaded guilty to conspiracy and admitted paying $15,600 to a Virginia telemarketing company that hired another business to make the calls. GOP consultant Allen Raymond also pleaded guilty. |
| # March 7th, 2005 6:48 PM Converted_Comment | |
I'm not sure I understand your position, krengle. Are you saying that it's OK for the Dems to "cheat" becasue "everyone cheats?" That's not a very reasonable position. I don't happen to think that any election fraud is justifiable, regardless of which "side" commits it. Do you understand the examples that you're citing above? 1. A company "was accused of." And the company "denied." That's a wash. Look how easy it is: I hereby accuse my boss of discouraging me from voting for Bush. Ok, call him up, he'll deny it. Give me a break. 2. Again, someone was "asked to investigate." Secondly, incomplete registrations SHOULD be thrown out. People register with false names all of the time. People try to vote multiple times. That's why we have "registration" in the first place. "They said such disqualifications would disadvantage minority voters." OK, good for them. If "they say" that Santa Claus is real, are you going to cite that as support in an argument? 3. In the 2000 census, Milwaukee County had 940,164 residents. Now I don't know how many of those are under 18, but it seems pretty unlikely that the county will need 938,000 ballots. Note that your "blurb" says that they are printing 10,000 more than were printed last time, not 10,000 more than were USED last time. You have no idea how many votes were cast in Milwaukee County last time around, do you? That's a fact you should probably get before posting that as an example of dirty politics or unfair play. According to one source it's 432,694. (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-gop/936812/posts) Do you really think that Milwaukee County will legitimately need over TWICE as many ballots as it did last time? Please. Try thinking for yourself before citing these blurbs off of super-democrat dot com or wherever you get them. It makes you look stupid when you simply repeat things that make no sense. I'm not going to waste my time responding to the rest of your post b/c the rest of your "points" simply make no sense. In the future, I'd recommend that you cite to your sources. That will not only give your argument more more weight, but it will also let other people who actually know what they're talking about figure out what the heck it is that you are blindly repeating. For instance, you cannot plead guilty to "conspiracy." That isn't a charge. Whoever wrote that article or issued the press release that you cited may know that, too, b/c i suspect that they wanted to insinuate that he's pleaded guilty to 18 USC 241 or similar when in fact the person (i looked it up) only plead to "conspiracy to annoy or harass." |
Log in here
or Get an Account here.







