Daily Page | Zebrality | NCAA Pool | General Chat | Latest Comments

You are on an individual archive page

Click here to return to the main page


The Daily Links Page
Got a link to submit?
  • Is McCain inching towards Pawlenty?
  • SEN. JOHN EDWARDS CAUGHT WITH MISTRESS AND LOVE CHILD!
  • Sources say McCain Veep Pick to Come This Week
  • Favre seeks unconditional release from Packers, sources say
       [ 4 comments ]
  • Jesse Ventura To Run for Senate?
  • Report: 'Itchy' Favre considers return to football
       [ 2 comments ]
  • LIMBAUGH SIGNS THROUGH 2016; $400 MILLION DEAL SHATTERS BROADCAST RECORDS
  • FLDS women offer handmade clothes for sale online
  • Sales Taxes In Chicago Now 10.25 Percent, Highest In Country
       [ 2 comments ]
  • 17 injured as French troops use live ammo in visitors day display
  • City Vehicles Painted with Anti-Obama Sayings
  • Court: A constitutional right to a gun
       [ 6 comments ]
  • HELLER AFFIRMED
  • Mike Ivey: Should Madison ban the drive-through?
  • Court rejects death penalty for raping children
  • Kelo Day: Fund the Fight Against Eminent Domain Abuse
  • Legendary Comedian George Carlin Dies at 71
  • Man Who Used Stick To Roll Ball Into Hole In Ground Praised For His Courage
       [ 1 comment ]
  • Victoria's Secret Sued Over 'Thong Injury'
       [ 2 comments ]
  • Obama Opts Out of Public Financing
  • Firefox claims download success
  • Irony Alert: AP Attacks Blogs for Quoting Their Stories, Then Quotes Even More Extensively from Blogs
  • Johnsonville Sausage opens brat stores in China to spur sales
       [ 1 comment ]
  • ESPN: The worldwide leader in bad predictions
  • Javon Walker apparent victim of robbery, found unconscious
  • Horse of the Year Curlin may run in Prix de L'arc de Triomphe
       [ 1 comment ]
  • Manners still matter when you're poking on Facebook
  • Tim Russert Dead at 58
  • Levee breaks near Cedar Rapids, thousands evacuate
  • Chris Osgood Gets To Third Base With Stanley Cup
  • Mud phobia pig gets its own boots
  • Ron Paul plans his own convention
  • WI's Lake Delton 'is gone'; other areas evacuated as dams near failure
       [ 1 comment ]
  • Poland's Kubica wins Canadian Grand Prix
  • Jim McKay, Olympics and ABC announcer, dies at age 86
  • Wisconsin mulling ban on bare chested fans at high school sports
  • Journey to Belmont Not Just for Horses
  • Where are the puffins?
  • Chicago among four finalists to host 2016 Olympics
  • Kelsey Grammer has 'mild' heart attack
  • Caught up in a suspicious deal enabled by lax lending standards, a man now owns a house he can\'t afford and never wanted
       [ 2 comments ]
  • Pacman could be fully reinstated by Sept. 1 if behavior holds up
  • The evolution of a congressman
  • Dying Art?
  • Bob Dole Rips Scott McClellan a New One
  • SUSAN SARANDON vows move to Canada if McCain elected
       [ 3 comments ]
  • New beer museums celebrate suds
  • The Global Flat Tax Revolution
  • Clay Aiken Is Going to Be a Dad
  • The Daily Kos Thread Of The Day: It's Karl Rove's Fault I Am Driving My Conservative Friends Away!

     

  • UK's Guardian runs story calling for Bush's assassination

       October 23, 2004

    The Guardian, the same UK paper that instructed its UK based readers to start calling or mailing Ohio voters and telling them to "vote against" President Bush, is now running a story calling for President Bush's assassination:

    On November 2, the entire civilised world will be praying, praying Bush loses. And Sod's law dictates he'll probably win, thereby disproving the existence of God once and for all. The world will endure four more years of idiocy, arrogance and unwarranted bloodshed, with no benevolent deity to watch over and save us. John Wilkes Booth, Lee Harvey Oswald, John Hinckley Jr - where are you now that we need you?

    This is so far over the line I don't even know where to start. I can only hope that the Guardian's offices get the same treatment as Al Jazeera's in last years "accidental" bombing.

    Update: Since the Guardian pulled the piece, we've reprinted it below.

    Charlie Brooker Saturday October 23, 2004 The Guardian

    Heady times. The US election draws ever nearer, and while the rest of the world bangs its head against the floorboards screaming "Please God, not Bush!", the candidates clash head to head in a series of live televised debates. It's a bit like American Idol, but with terrifying global ramifications. You've got to laugh.

    Or have you? Have you seen the debates? I urge you to do so. The exemplary BBC News website (www.bbc.co.uk/news) hosts unexpurgated streaming footage of all the recent debates, plus clips from previous encounters, through Reagan and Carter, all the way back to Nixon versus JFK.

    Watching Bush v Kerry, two things immediately strike you. First, the opening explanation of the rules makes the whole thing feel like a Radio 4 parlour game. And second, George W Bush is... well, he's... Jesus, where do you start?

    The internet's a-buzz with speculation that Bush has been wearing a wire, receiving help from some off-stage lackey. Screen grabs appearing to show a mysterious bulge in the centre of his back are being traded like Top Trumps. Prior to seeing the debate footage, I regarded this with healthy scepticism: the whole "wire" scandal was just wishful thinking on behalf of some amateur Michael Moores, I figured. And then I watched the footage.

    Quite frankly, the man's either wired or mad. If it's the former, he should be flung out of office: tarred, feathered and kicked in the nuts. And if it's the latter, his behaviour goes beyond strange, and heads toward terrifying. He looks like he's listening to something we can't hear. He blinks, he mumbles, he lets a sentence trail off, starts a new one, then reverts back to whatever he was saying in the first place. Each time he recalls a statistic (either from memory or the voice in his head), he flashes us a dumb little smile, like a toddler proudly showing off its first bowel movement. Forgive me for employing the language of the playground, but the man's a tool.

    So I sit there and I watch this and I start scratching my head, because I'm trying to work out why Bush is afforded any kind of credence or respect whatsoever in his native country. His performance is so transparently bizarre, so feeble and stumbling, it's a miracle he wasn't laughed off the stage. And then I start hunting around the internet, looking to see what the US media made of the whole "wire" debate. And they just let it die. They mentioned it in passing, called it a wacko conspiracy theory and moved on.
    Yet whether it turns out to be true or not, right now it's certainly plausible - even if you discount the bulge photos and simply watch the president's ridiculous smirking face. Perhaps he isn't wired. Perhaps he's just gone gaga. If you don't ask the questions, you'll never know the truth.

    The silence is all the more troubling since in the past the US news media has had no problem at all covering other wacko conspiracy theories, ones with far less evidence to support them. (For infuriating confirmation of this, watch the second part of the must-see documentary series The Power Of Nightmares (Wed, 9pm, BBC2) and witness the absurd hounding of Bill Clinton over the Whitewater and Vince Foster non-scandals.)

    Throughout the debate, John Kerry, for his part, looks and sounds a bit like a haunted tree. But at least he's not a lying, sniggering, drink-driving, selfish, reckless, ignorant, dangerous, backward, drooling, twitching, blinking, mouse-faced little cheat. And besides, in a fight between a tree and a bush, I know who I'd favour.

    On November 2, the entire civilised world will be praying, praying Bush loses. And Sod's law dictates he'll probably win, thereby disproving the existence of God once and for all. The world will endure four more years of idiocy, arrogance and unwarranted bloodshed, with no benevolent deity to watch over and save us. John Wilkes Booth, Lee Harvey Oswald, John Hinckley Jr - where are you now that we need you?


    When they pulled it, they explained that they understand that it "offended" some people and assured its readers that it was simply a joke.

    The final sentence of a column in The Guide on Saturday caused offence to some readers. The Guardian associates itself with the following statement from the writer.

    "Charlie Brooker apologises for any offence caused by his comments relating to President Bush in his TV column, Screen Burn. The views expressed in this column are not those of the Guardian. Although flippant and tasteless, his closing comments were intended as an ironic joke, not as a call to action - an intention he believed regular readers of his humorous column would understand. He deplores violence of any kind."


    What do you think? Does that sound like a funny joke to you?


    Posted by jkhat at October 23, 2004 06:40 PM

        The trackback entry for this page is : http://www.inthehat.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/487

     

    Trackback Entries

     


    Comments

    #  March 7th, 2005 6:48 PM      Converted_Comment
    Converted comment: Posted by: zetetic at October 23, 2004 08:19 PM

    Ah, more of that "tolerance" the Left is so rightly renowned for.

     
     
    #  March 7th, 2005 6:48 PM      Converted_Comment
    Converted comment: Posted by: Dittybopper at October 24, 2004 06:01 PM

    Let me get this straight- three of the most popular and effective presidents this country has ever had are targets of assassins - two are killed one is wounded - is the Guardian implying that this is a good thing too emulate? Lets say someone follows there suggestion and kills President Bush - would the Guardian then advocate assassination of President Cheney? Don't they realize any attempt on the president's life would absolutely guarantee his reelection? Judging by the abysmal failure of their idiotic plan to influence voters in Ohio, the Guardian is clueless about the USA and the people who live here.

     
     

     

     


    To leave a comment you must be logged in.
    Log in here
    or Get an Account here.