You are on an individual archive page

Click here to return to the main page


Wikipedia does good things. Reward them.

The Daily Links Page
Got a link to submit?
  • New Evidence Proves First Flag Made By Betsy Ross Actually Shirt For Gay Friend
  • Colbert Leads Huntsman in S.C.
  • Polish prosecutor 'shoots self after news conference'
  • Jim Rome leaving ESPN. Bonus: Footage of Jim Rome getting attacked by Jim Everett & crying like a baby
  • Broncos, Tim Tebow stun Steelers in OT, win 29-23 in NFL playoffs
       [ 2 comments ]
  • Video: Remember 2008
       [ 1 comment ]
  • Beezow Doo-Doo Zopittybop-Bop-Bop faces weapon and drug charges
  • Video: Green Bay anchorman loves lamp
  • Video: Rodgers & Raji in the new Discount Double Check ad
  • Jim Rome: out of The Jungle and onto the (horse) farm
  • New IL Law Requires Photo ID To Buy Drain Cleaner
  • Fawn Cuddles Kitten, Hearts Explode
  • The priest who changed the course of history for the worse... by rescuing four-year-old Hitler from drowning in icy river
  • Get Fit or Get Fined: Web Service Offers to Charge You for Skipping the Gym
  • Fine proposed for botching US national anthem
  • Why Best Buy is Going out of Business...Gradually
       [ 1 comment ]
  • Edina boutique takes heat for trashing $4,000-plus gowns
  • Law Student Goes 'Homeless by Choice' Touts Value of Gym Club Membership
  • VIDEO: Snoop Dogg on 'The Price Is Right'
  • Flynn and Out
       [ 3 comments ]
  • Don't put Bielema on the firing line
       [ 1 comment ]
  • Your end of the season Vikings comment thread
       [ 2 comments ]
  • Mass. budget motel fights forfeiture by feds
  • Vikings scrutinize downtown Mpls. stadium site near basilica
       [ 2 comments ]
  • Kelly Clarkson criticized on Twitter after singer endorses Ron Paul for President 
  • Political Predictions for 2012
  • We're All Doing The Best We Can
  • Video Of Little Girl Getting Pissed Off About Pink Toys Will Make Your Heart Swell
  • The 10 best sports-related Hitler Reactions of 2011
  • Happy Endings on the housing crisis
  • Why You Just Got New York Times Spam
  • There Will Be No Friday This Week In Samoa
  • The Most Hipster State In The US
  • Online Merchants Home in on Imbibing Consumers
       [ 1 comment ]
  • On islamic fashion
       [ 1 comment ]
  • Sears as Lampert's 'Mismanaged Asset' Loses Customers to Macy's
       [ 1 comment ]
  • 5 social network predictions for 2012
  • Cheetah, chimp star of classic Tarzan movies, dies at 80
  • The Hottest Things on TV in 2011
  • Beer in cans: It's not just for Bud anymore
  • Seven Packers earn Pro Bowl selections
  • The Worst Angry Christmas Tweets In the World
       [ 2 comments ]
  • Minnesota cities try to hold back on rented housing
  • Why Iowa Shouldn't Vote First Anymore
  • Some Falcons Players Upset Drew Brees Went For The Record Last Night
  • We've Identified Jilted Packergirl
  • With its 'W' initiative, ESPN tries to solve the equation of serving women sports fans
       [ 2 comments ]
  • Owner surprised to find cat regularly catches bus
  • Charles Barkley: Skip Bayless Has Surpassed Peter Vecsey As The Biggest Jackass In The History Of Journalism
  • Handicapping the 2011 NFL MVP Race, 2.0

     

  • Get the Fame out of Politics

       November 03, 2004

    My friend Steve (and, it occurs to me that I talk about several Steves, so let's just dub this one "Conservative Steve") emails me with an interesting question:

    Why is it that there's such a huge outcry to "get the money out of politics", which obviously originates from the left (and sadly, John McCain), while little or nothing is said about getting the "fame out of politics." Let me explain. It's such an accepted fact in the media that wealthy donors and big business try to use their money to influence politics and that this is a bad thing (except when it comes from George Soros but I digress). Well then, shouldn't it be a bad thing when Bruce Springsteen, Leo Dicaprio, Sheryl Crow, et al try to use their fame to influence elections? In both cases people are using the resources available to them (whether it be fame or cash) to influence people's vote. If you are going to ban or severely limit the use of cash, shouldn't you also limit the use of fame? Ridiculous right? But how do these two resources differ? Maybe I'm just tired of living in a swing state and having to listen to high school dropouts who got famous talk about what a villain Bush is.

    Conservative Steve has a good point. Can you imagine the outcry if, for example, there was a "Specter/Kennedy Bill" that restricted the amount of volunteer hours that people could put into a political campaign? The free speech hawks would be up in arms, and rightly so.

    Like Conservative Steve, I just don't see the sense in limiting the use of some personal resources, but not others. It's another perfect example of the way some liberals know nothing except that rich people are "bad".


    Posted by at November 3, 2004 11:11 AM

        The trackback entry for this page is : http://www.inthehat.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/510

     

    Trackback Entries

     


    Comments

    #  March 7th, 2005 6:48 PM      Converted_Comment
    Converted comment: Posted by: AST at November 3, 2004 03:58 PM

    I was just thinking last night about the monetary value of having the MSM running PR pieces for you and against your opponent. The NYTimes and CBS have been especially shameless.

    There is no way to separate cash donations from media plugs and Hollywood influence. We saw how well McCain-Feingold got the money out of this campaign. Politicians will always provide themselves a loophole to get it back in. Money is the mother's milk of politics isn't just a platitude. Anybody that wants to regulate it is just trying to get an edge for himself.

     
     
    #  March 7th, 2005 6:48 PM      Converted_Comment
    Converted comment: Posted by: Proud Texas Mom at November 4, 2004 01:10 PM

    No.... it's GREAT that celebrities stump for the campaigns. They ALWAYS latch onto the democratic liberals, and that's GREAT news for Republicans. Myself and quite a few of my friends felt like we didn't just vote for Bush, we also voted AGAINST Michael Moore and the Lala-Land elite. Those celebrities, by their very nature and pampered existence, are hopelessly out of touch with mainstream America. And most of those mainstream American conservatives are very suspicious of them. Alice Cooper had it right when he voiced amazement that anyone would vote according to what a rock and roller would tell them!

     
     

     

     


      page rendered in 0.0526 seconds | ©2004, 2005 Dummocrats.com