Daily Page | Zebrality | NCAA Pool | General Chat | Latest Comments

You are on an individual archive page

Click here to return to the main page


The Daily Links Page
Got a link to submit?
  • Madison Alder wants to change laws to allow homeless to sleep & urinate in public
  • Author of '100 Things to Do Before You Die' dies at 47
  • 9-year-old boy banned from pitching youth baseball because he's 'too good'
  • American Idol adds fourth judge
  • Britain's 'Iron Lady' Thatcher has dementia
  • Global Warming Strikes Again - Frost in August
  • Obama's running mate choice revealed by bumper sticker?
  • Nader predicts Obama to pick Clinton
  • U.S. and Poland sign missile shield deal
  • Kristol: Colin Powell to Endorse Barack Obama
  • Beijing Olympic 2008 opening ceremony giant firework footprints faked
  • Edwards Admits Sexual Affair; Lied as Presidential Candidate
  • B-B-B-B-B-B-Brett-y and the Jets
  • McCain Volunteers Wife For Topless Contest
  • NFL says Favre to be reinstated and will report to Green Bay Packers on Monday
  • Legislators aim to snuff out penalties for pot use
  • Police: Accused shooter hated liberals, wanted to be killed
  • Randy Pausch, noted CMU prof, succumbs to cancer
  • Is McCain inching towards Pawlenty?
  • SEN. JOHN EDWARDS CAUGHT WITH MISTRESS AND LOVE CHILD!
  • Sources say McCain Veep Pick to Come This Week
  • Favre seeks unconditional release from Packers, sources say
       [ 4 comments ]
  • Jesse Ventura To Run for Senate?
  • Report: 'Itchy' Favre considers return to football
       [ 2 comments ]
  • LIMBAUGH SIGNS THROUGH 2016; $400 MILLION DEAL SHATTERS BROADCAST RECORDS
  • FLDS women offer handmade clothes for sale online
  • Sales Taxes In Chicago Now 10.25 Percent, Highest In Country
       [ 2 comments ]
  • 17 injured as French troops use live ammo in visitors day display
  • City Vehicles Painted with Anti-Obama Sayings
  • Court: A constitutional right to a gun
       [ 6 comments ]
  • HELLER AFFIRMED
  • Mike Ivey: Should Madison ban the drive-through?
  • Court rejects death penalty for raping children
  • Kelo Day: Fund the Fight Against Eminent Domain Abuse
  • Legendary Comedian George Carlin Dies at 71
  • Man Who Used Stick To Roll Ball Into Hole In Ground Praised For His Courage
       [ 1 comment ]
  • Victoria's Secret Sued Over 'Thong Injury'
       [ 2 comments ]
  • Obama Opts Out of Public Financing
  • Firefox claims download success
  • Irony Alert: AP Attacks Blogs for Quoting Their Stories, Then Quotes Even More Extensively from Blogs
  • Johnsonville Sausage opens brat stores in China to spur sales
       [ 1 comment ]
  • ESPN: The worldwide leader in bad predictions
  • Javon Walker apparent victim of robbery, found unconscious
  • Horse of the Year Curlin may run in Prix de L'arc de Triomphe
       [ 1 comment ]
  • Manners still matter when you're poking on Facebook
  • Tim Russert Dead at 58
  • Levee breaks near Cedar Rapids, thousands evacuate
  • Chris Osgood Gets To Third Base With Stanley Cup
  • Mud phobia pig gets its own boots
  • Ron Paul plans his own convention

     

  • Welcoming Ward Churchill

       March 01, 2005

    Ward Churchill will be at the University of Wisconsin-Whitewater to give a talk today.

    Even though Whitewater is just a hop, skip and jump away from Madison, my local media is barely covering the event. However, the ever-expanding Wisconsin blogosphere is all over the story, the Badger Blog Alliance will be reporting from the event, while blog-friendly columnist and radioman Charlie Sykes will also be on the scene. And, I'm sure more Wisconsin blogs will chime in with their post-speech reactions.

    Speaking of speech, there's a particularly funny juxtaposition of stories in the news here this morning. On one hand, Churchill's appearance in Whitewater is framed this way:

    Meanwhile, Mattmiller says the campus controversy continues with College Democrats scheduled to step out in support of free speech as College Republicans protest the Colorado History professor's comments comparing victims of 9/11 to Nazis.

    Former Marine and current student David Hamilton says he doesn't want anything to do with Churchill, but he does defend his right to speak.

    "That's the beautiful thing about America, you know, that's why I was glad that I volunteered my service in the military because everyone does have the right to speak what they want."

    However, elsewhere in Madison, an alderman is trying to ban moving advertisements. I heard this story on the news last night and almost fell off the treadmill. While this article talks about how the advertisments are a distraction, in the interview I heard, the alderman was basically making the proposal because he thinks the advertisements are an eyesore.

    I support Ward Churchill's 1st Amendment rights. I also support the 1st Amendment rights of the people who don't like what he says. Supporters and detractors of Churchill will wax poetic about how this demonstrates the beauty of free speech. I don't disagree with them. I just wonder how some of the same people can turn around and be so willing to restrict speech because it's an "eyesore" or because it's "hate speech" or because it's in the form of a political donation or advertisement.


    Posted by kris at March 1, 2005 08:58 AM

        The trackback entry for this page is : http://www.inthehat.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/728

     

    Trackback Entries

     


    Comments

    #  March 7th, 2005 6:48 PM      Converted_Comment
    Converted comment: Posted by: james at March 1, 2005 09:59 AM

    commercial speech (e.g. advertisements) isn't entitled to full first amendment protection. if the speech is truthful and is not advertising an illegal good or service the court applies a somewhat intermediate level of scrutiny when assessing whether a particular restriction is reasonable (central hudson), requiring that 1 the government restriction advance an important govt interest and 2 that the restriction be no more restrictive than necessary.

    interestingly, the law in this area is in flux with a somewhat unlikely group of justices (rehnquist, breyer, stevens, ginsberg) of the opinion that this sort of 1A analysis leads to "lochnerism." (long story)


    churchill, on the other hand, is an asshat. i do not support his "right" to speak on the public's dime at a public university, being paid w/ public funds and/or using public facilities. he has no such right.

    also, the court hasnt yet developed an "asshatted speech" doctrine, and it think it's long overtime that they did.

     
     
    #  March 7th, 2005 6:48 PM      Converted_Comment
    Converted comment: Posted by: Paul Wolf at March 5, 2005 02:34 AM

    Professor Stoolpigeon
    http://www.nypress.com/18/9/news&columns/krassner.cfm

     
     

     

     


    To leave a comment you must be logged in.
    Log in here
    or Get an Account here.