You are on an individual archive page

Click here to return to the main page


Wikipedia does good things. Reward them.

The Daily Links Page
Got a link to submit?
  • New Evidence Proves First Flag Made By Betsy Ross Actually Shirt For Gay Friend
  • Colbert Leads Huntsman in S.C.
  • Polish prosecutor 'shoots self after news conference'
  • Jim Rome leaving ESPN. Bonus: Footage of Jim Rome getting attacked by Jim Everett & crying like a baby
  • Broncos, Tim Tebow stun Steelers in OT, win 29-23 in NFL playoffs
       [ 2 comments ]
  • Video: Remember 2008
       [ 1 comment ]
  • Beezow Doo-Doo Zopittybop-Bop-Bop faces weapon and drug charges
  • Video: Green Bay anchorman loves lamp
  • Video: Rodgers & Raji in the new Discount Double Check ad
  • Jim Rome: out of The Jungle and onto the (horse) farm
  • New IL Law Requires Photo ID To Buy Drain Cleaner
  • Fawn Cuddles Kitten, Hearts Explode
  • The priest who changed the course of history for the worse... by rescuing four-year-old Hitler from drowning in icy river
  • Get Fit or Get Fined: Web Service Offers to Charge You for Skipping the Gym
  • Fine proposed for botching US national anthem
  • Why Best Buy is Going out of Business...Gradually
       [ 1 comment ]
  • Edina boutique takes heat for trashing $4,000-plus gowns
  • Law Student Goes 'Homeless by Choice' Touts Value of Gym Club Membership
  • VIDEO: Snoop Dogg on 'The Price Is Right'
  • Flynn and Out
       [ 3 comments ]
  • Don't put Bielema on the firing line
       [ 1 comment ]
  • Your end of the season Vikings comment thread
       [ 2 comments ]
  • Mass. budget motel fights forfeiture by feds
  • Vikings scrutinize downtown Mpls. stadium site near basilica
       [ 2 comments ]
  • Kelly Clarkson criticized on Twitter after singer endorses Ron Paul for President 
  • Political Predictions for 2012
  • We're All Doing The Best We Can
  • Video Of Little Girl Getting Pissed Off About Pink Toys Will Make Your Heart Swell
  • The 10 best sports-related Hitler Reactions of 2011
  • Happy Endings on the housing crisis
  • Why You Just Got New York Times Spam
  • There Will Be No Friday This Week In Samoa
  • The Most Hipster State In The US
  • Online Merchants Home in on Imbibing Consumers
       [ 1 comment ]
  • On islamic fashion
       [ 1 comment ]
  • Sears as Lampert's 'Mismanaged Asset' Loses Customers to Macy's
       [ 1 comment ]
  • 5 social network predictions for 2012
  • Cheetah, chimp star of classic Tarzan movies, dies at 80
  • The Hottest Things on TV in 2011
  • Beer in cans: It's not just for Bud anymore
  • Seven Packers earn Pro Bowl selections
  • The Worst Angry Christmas Tweets In the World
       [ 2 comments ]
  • Minnesota cities try to hold back on rented housing
  • Why Iowa Shouldn't Vote First Anymore
  • Some Falcons Players Upset Drew Brees Went For The Record Last Night
  • We've Identified Jilted Packergirl
  • With its 'W' initiative, ESPN tries to solve the equation of serving women sports fans
       [ 2 comments ]
  • Owner surprised to find cat regularly catches bus
  • Charles Barkley: Skip Bayless Has Surpassed Peter Vecsey As The Biggest Jackass In The History Of Journalism
  • Handicapping the 2011 NFL MVP Race, 2.0

     

  • Putting Pirates in Prison

       April 21, 2005

    A new bill, expected to be signed into law by President Bush, will provide up to three yeas of jail time for movie pirates.

    `Sec. 2319B. Unauthorized recording of Motion pictures in a Motion picture exhibition facility

    `(a) Offense- Any person who, without the authorization of the copyright owner, knowingly uses or attempts to use an audiovisual recording device to transmit or make a copy of a motion picture or other audiovisual work protected under title 17, or any part thereof, from a performance of such work in a motion picture exhibition facility, shall--

    `(1) be imprisoned for not more than 3 years, fined under this title, or both; or

    `(2) if the offense is a second or subsequent offense, be imprisoned for no more than 6 years, fined under this title, or both.

    The Family Entertainment and Copyright Act of 2005 also contains provisions that will allow movie theater owners to detain suspected movie pirates, and it gives them immunity from civil or criminal actions that might arise from that detainment.

    `(d) Immunity for Theaters- With reasonable cause, the owner or lessee of a motion picture exhibition facility where a motion picture or other audiovisual work is being exhibited, the authorized agent or employee of such owner or lessee, the licensor of the motion picture or other audiovisual work being exhibited, or the agent or employee of such licensor--

    `(1) may detain, in a reasonable manner and for a reasonable time, any person suspected of a violation of this section with respect to that motion picture or audiovisual work for the purpose of questioning or summoning a law enforcement officer; and

    `(2) shall not be held liable in any civil or criminal action arising out of a detention under paragraph (1).

    But wait! There's more!

    In addition, the vitims of this heinous crime of video piracy will be able to submit a "Victim Impact Statement" to the court:

    `(e) Victim Impact Statement-

    `(1) IN GENERAL- During the preparation of the presentence report under rule 32(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, victims of an offense under this section shall be permitted to submit to the probation officer a victim impact statement that identifies the victim of the offense and the extent and scope of the injury and loss suffered by the victim, including the estimated economic impact of the offense on that victim.

    So, in deciding how long to lock someone up for infringing another's copyright, the judge will take into account a statment from MGM saying "he really, really, really, hurt us. our lives will never be the same again! i hate him! i hate him! oh, that evil pirate!"

    "now we can't afford to pay demi and ashton their promised $25 million! they're never going to settle for 24.9!"

    I'm all for copyright protection - in fact, I'm even a soon-to-be Intellectual Property Lawyer - but excuse me if I don't shed a tear for the Columbia-Tristar on this one.

    Illegally enter the country, get a Fake ID, then burglarize someone's house and you get in no trouble at all. But snap a few snapshots in a movie theater and you'll get sent to San Quentin for 3 years. Hmm, maybe the solution to the illegal immigration problem is to line the Rio Grande with camcorders and free tickets to Loews?


    Posted by jkhat at April 21, 2005 01:33 PM

        The trackback entry for this page is : http://www.inthehat.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/846

     

    Trackback Entries

     


    Comments

    #  April 21st, 2005 2:27 PM      kris
    Or, alternatively, if you want to be a video pirate, consider hiring some illegal aliens to do the tapings for you.  
     
    #  April 27th, 2005 1:15 PM      pKai
    History repeats itself and the entertainment industry never learns from the past.....

    PIRACY INDIRECTLY INCREASES PROFITS!!!

    Chicken Little predictions came when Beta VCRs were released, then again when VHS came out, again when CD burners came out, and DVD burners, and MP3s, etc, etc.....

    ..... and the movie industry makes more money today than at any time in its history......

    Back in the 80's industry friends of mine were predicting the death of the movie theater at the hands of taped movies whether pirated or legal. Back then a 5-screen theater was a huge thing. 20 years later we have 25-screen theaters on every street corner.

    My friend was just as wrong then as this stupid law is today.  
     

     

     


      page rendered in 0.0734 seconds | ©2004, 2005 Dummocrats.com