Daily Page | Zebrality | 2010 Football Pool | General Chat | Latest Comments

You are on an individual archive page

Click here to return to the main page


Wikipedia does good things. Reward them.

The Daily Links Page
Got a link to submit?
  • Double Rainbow Guy in Windows Live Ad
  • Skeptoid.com on the Myers-Briggs Personality Test
  • New Glarus Brewing invites fans to weigh in on its 2011 beer schedule
  • UW the big loser in Big Ten realignment
       [ 14 comments ]
  • Glee, Flight of the Conchords featured on 9/26 Simpsons premiere
       [ 1 comment ]
  • Zenyatta Stakes reverting to old name meaning Zenyatta will not be able to win the Zenyatta stakes
  • Target to sell Facebook Credits gift cards
  • Officials: Suspect holding hostages at Discovery Channel
       [ 1 comment ]
  • New Big Ten divisions to be announced 7 pm ET tonight
       [ 77 comments ]
  • UEFA enacts vuvuzela ban
  • Blair: Bush world view had 'immense simplicity'
  • Best. Horserace Call. Ever.
       [ 1 comment ]
  • The Media Loses Readers and Viewers to its Own Radicalism
  • Great Debate: Can Rodgers overtake Favre?
       [ 20 comments ]
  • Homeowne's Fight Involves Flag Tied to Tea Party
  • Why Do Heavy Drinkers Outlive Nondrinkers?
       [ 1 comment ]
  • Authorities Were on High Alert for Possible Hijack Attempt
  • Behind the hurricane hype
  • UW-Madison: 17th-best damn university in the whole damn world
  • Social media votes on Aaron Rodgers' beard
       [ 2 comments ]
  • Not so cuddly now: It's claws the psycho squirrel
  • Top 5 Floating Sheep Maps
  • Texas Rep. violated rules, steered scholarships to relatives
  • The smell of freshly-cut grass is actually a plant distress call
  • Why can't Barack Obama tell the world about American tolerance?
  • Anyone Who Wants to Cut Entitlements Clearly Has No Place on a Commission Devoted to Fiscal Responsibility
  • The great Obama-Axelrod-etc. mystery
  • Is the Trade Gap to Blame for Slowing GDP Growth?
  • The six wives of Henry VIII in the movies
       [ 1 comment ]
  • Who's Stupid?
  • Brewers' Gallardo robbed at gunpoint
  • Want to be class president? Not if you're black, in one Miss. school
  • Lance Armstrong Wants To Tell Nation Something But Nation Has To Promise Not To Get Mad
  • Most humble and most arrogant Presidents
       [ 3 comments ]
  • Singles: best soundtrack of the 90's
       [ 1 comment ]
  • Observation Deck: Packers-Colts
  • David Hasselhoff to Compete on ABC's Dancing With the Stars!
  • Solution to the Ground Zero Mosque Dilemma
  • Trapped miners in Chile assuming different roles
  • 'Sportwriters on TV' back on the air ... in Chicago
       [ 2 comments ]
  • Polish man, shot in head, notices five years later
  • Inside the secret world of Trader Joe's
  • Report: Wisconsin & Iowa will be in separate Big Ten divisions
       [ 10 comments ]
  • That buzz you hear? Must be mosquitoes, not interest in Gophers
       [ 2 comments ]
  • Death of a Hero: Brett Favre's Tragic Fall from Grace
  • Rand vs. Ron? Cordoba House Drives Wedge Through The Paul Family
  • Former RNC chairman Ken Mehlman: I'm gay
  • Greeks 'discover Odysseus' palace in Ithaca, proving Homer's hero was real
       [ 3 comments ]
  • Angry Birds eyes a movie/TV deal
  • Coffee shops to customers: get the hell out
       [ 3 comments ]

     

  • The Genius of the People

       May 22, 2005

    With the judicial filibuster debate raging, I thought it'd be a good time to learn more about the Constitution and try to get an idea of what the Framers were really thinking back in that sweltering summer of 1787. So today I started reading Charles Mee's "The Genuis of the People". The book tells the story of the Constitutional Convention.

    I'm about three quarters of the way through and it's funny how sometimes I side with the Madisonians and their concept of a strong central government. Other times, I shake my head at Madison and wonder how he couldn't understand the fears of the smaller states.

    As I read, there are men I'm less than impressed with (Alexander Hamilton is one, I don't like his rather elitist dismissal of the people) and while there are obvious heroes like Washington, Madison and Franklin, one of the men I most admire so far is George Mason. Prior to today, my knowledge of George Mason consisted of the fact that he has a University named after him (a friend of mine went to it). But now I know that Mason, in spite of his patrician background, was yet another true champion of the people.

    In addition to conflicts between North & South, big states and small states, and proponents of local vs. centralized government, the Constitution Convention tackled the question of how to deal with imminent inclusion of Western states into the Union. Many delegates tried to frame the Constitution to permanently vest power in the more "enlightened" East. As Gouverneur Morris said:

    Westerners would certainly "not be able to furnish men equally enlightened to share in the administration of our common interests. The Busy haunts of men-not the remote wilderness-was the proper School of political Talents. If the Western people get the power into their hands they will ruin the Atlantic interests."

    To this Mason, from the traditional seat of power in Virginia, said:

    if Western states were to be brought into the Union at all, "they must be treated as equals, and subjected to no degrading discriminatins. They will have the same pride and passions whic we have, and will not unite with or will speedily revolt from the Union, if they are not in all respects placed on an equal footing with their brethren."

    Later in the Convention, Mason, himself a large land owner, again stood up for the common people, when it was proposed that suffrage be restricted to freeholders. Mason said:

    "every man having evidence of attachment to and permanent common interest with the Society ought to share in all its rights and privileges. Was this qualification restrained to freeholders? Does no other kind of property but land evidence a common interest in the proprietor? Does nothing besides property mark a permanent attachment? Ought the merchant, the monied man, the parent of a number of children whose fortunes are to be pursued in their own Country, to be viewed as suspicious characters, and unworthy to be trusted with the common rights of their fellow Citizens?"

    One of the things that's so great about Mason (and really, this applies to so many of the Framers) is that he didn't go to the Convention strictly to advance the cause of "his kind". I know some Democrats won't understand this, but Mason went against his own self interest and instead tried to do what he believed was right for his country.

    I'm not sure what the Framers would think of we should do about the judicial filibusters. They saw the Senate as a check on the passions of the House, not on the powers of the President. But, they were just as worried about a tyranny of a majority (hence the Senate check on the House) as of a tyranny of a minority (the House check on the Senate). Of course, at the end of the day, those men were capable of crafting compromises that preserved our more perfect Union. Hopefully the "wise" men and women in the Senate today can do the same.


    Posted by at May 22, 2005 10:40 PM

        The trackback entry for this page is : http://www.inthehat.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/921

     

    Trackback Entries

     


    Comments

    There are no comments for this story.

     

    yet.

     

     


    To leave a comment you must be logged in.
    Log in here
    or Get an Account here.


      page rendered in 0.2686 seconds | ©2004, 2005 Dummocrats.com