You are on an individual archive page

Click here to return to the main page


Wikipedia does good things. Reward them.

The Daily Links Page
Got a link to submit?
  • New Evidence Proves First Flag Made By Betsy Ross Actually Shirt For Gay Friend
  • Colbert Leads Huntsman in S.C.
  • Polish prosecutor 'shoots self after news conference'
  • Jim Rome leaving ESPN. Bonus: Footage of Jim Rome getting attacked by Jim Everett & crying like a baby
  • Broncos, Tim Tebow stun Steelers in OT, win 29-23 in NFL playoffs
       [ 2 comments ]
  • Video: Remember 2008
       [ 1 comment ]
  • Beezow Doo-Doo Zopittybop-Bop-Bop faces weapon and drug charges
  • Video: Green Bay anchorman loves lamp
  • Video: Rodgers & Raji in the new Discount Double Check ad
  • Jim Rome: out of The Jungle and onto the (horse) farm
  • New IL Law Requires Photo ID To Buy Drain Cleaner
  • Fawn Cuddles Kitten, Hearts Explode
  • The priest who changed the course of history for the worse... by rescuing four-year-old Hitler from drowning in icy river
  • Get Fit or Get Fined: Web Service Offers to Charge You for Skipping the Gym
  • Fine proposed for botching US national anthem
  • Why Best Buy is Going out of Business...Gradually
       [ 1 comment ]
  • Edina boutique takes heat for trashing $4,000-plus gowns
  • Law Student Goes 'Homeless by Choice' Touts Value of Gym Club Membership
  • VIDEO: Snoop Dogg on 'The Price Is Right'
  • Flynn and Out
       [ 3 comments ]
  • Don't put Bielema on the firing line
       [ 1 comment ]
  • Your end of the season Vikings comment thread
       [ 2 comments ]
  • Mass. budget motel fights forfeiture by feds
  • Vikings scrutinize downtown Mpls. stadium site near basilica
       [ 2 comments ]
  • Kelly Clarkson criticized on Twitter after singer endorses Ron Paul for President 
  • Political Predictions for 2012
  • We're All Doing The Best We Can
  • Video Of Little Girl Getting Pissed Off About Pink Toys Will Make Your Heart Swell
  • The 10 best sports-related Hitler Reactions of 2011
  • Happy Endings on the housing crisis
  • Why You Just Got New York Times Spam
  • There Will Be No Friday This Week In Samoa
  • The Most Hipster State In The US
  • Online Merchants Home in on Imbibing Consumers
       [ 1 comment ]
  • On islamic fashion
       [ 1 comment ]
  • Sears as Lampert's 'Mismanaged Asset' Loses Customers to Macy's
       [ 1 comment ]
  • 5 social network predictions for 2012
  • Cheetah, chimp star of classic Tarzan movies, dies at 80
  • The Hottest Things on TV in 2011
  • Beer in cans: It's not just for Bud anymore
  • Seven Packers earn Pro Bowl selections
  • The Worst Angry Christmas Tweets In the World
       [ 2 comments ]
  • Minnesota cities try to hold back on rented housing
  • Why Iowa Shouldn't Vote First Anymore
  • Some Falcons Players Upset Drew Brees Went For The Record Last Night
  • We've Identified Jilted Packergirl
  • With its 'W' initiative, ESPN tries to solve the equation of serving women sports fans
       [ 2 comments ]
  • Owner surprised to find cat regularly catches bus
  • Charles Barkley: Skip Bayless Has Surpassed Peter Vecsey As The Biggest Jackass In The History Of Journalism
  • Handicapping the 2011 NFL MVP Race, 2.0

     

  • The Filthy, Filthy Rich

       June 08, 2005

    With Bryan from Sanity in Mad City off somewhere enjoying his retirement, I feel it's up to me to expose some of the everyday lunacy at Madison's Capital Times.

    Today resident Commie Dave Zwiefel opines on the evils of the Bush tax cut and how the top .1% of taxpayers are "getting richer at the expense of the country as a whole." Says Zwiefel:

    The ascent of the super-rich still wasn't enough for the Bush administration, though.

    Its irresponsible tax cuts, while throwing a couple of hundred bucks a year to the lower and middle classes, disproportionately went to those who already were millionaires. The 39.6 upper bracket, for example, dropped to 35 percent. When you're making $3 million a year, a 4.6 percent tax cut on everything above $319,000 ain't bad - enough for a new Mercedes or two.

    Oh, where to start? How about with this handy chart:

    The chart represents data from the 2001 calendar year. At that time, "the top 50% were those individuals or couples filing jointly who earned $26,000 and up in 1999." In fact, the top 25% of taxpayers payed 82.9% of all taxes. Now, explain to me how any administration can do more than "throw a couple of hundred bucks a year to the lower and middle classes" when that's all that they pay?

    But back to the dastardly super rich. These free riders who aren't doing their share, are actually paying around 12% of all income taxes. Does Zwiefel really think that those folks need to foot more of the bill for the other 99.9% of the country? Wait! I think we know the answer.

    What I don't understand is why folks like Zwiefel only see an ecomonic benefit to the country if the super rich's money goes to the Government. He sneers about how tax cuts allow the super rich to afford "a new Mercedes or two", but ignores the benefits of disposable wealth like that. Follow along Dave:

    • Richie Rich buys a new yacht from Burger Boat in Manitowoc, WI
    • Increased sales lead Burger's President, David Ross, to hire another engineer
    • With her new job, this engineer is able to put a down payment on a home. She buys several thousand dollars of appliances and furnishings...
    • Increasing the commission for the salesperson who served her. He, in turn, uses some of this extra money to take his wife out for a nice dinner at a local restaurant
    • And, because he's feeling expansive, he tips the nice, young waitress far above his usual 18.5%
    It's capitalism, and it's a beautiful thing, isn't it? Especially when compared to the alternative: tax the rich more and funnel their income into a variety of ineffective government programs. Americans, even the super rich, know how to spend their money far better than their government does.



    Posted by at June 8, 2005 01:19 PM

        The trackback entry for this page is : http://www.inthehat.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/949

     

    Trackback Entries

     


    Comments

    #  June 8th, 2005 1:44 PM      chummer
    Amen.

    And as much as it pains Zweifel to say it, the Super-rich became super-prosperous in the 90s, not because of the Bush tax cuts.

    Also, the Bush tax cuts made the income tax more prorgressive, not less so. The super-rich (top 0.1%) did get a bit of a break, but overall the top 1% is paying a larger percentage of total income taxes than before, but good luck getting them to admit it.  
     
    #  June 8th, 2005 1:55 PM      kris
    There were so many other things I could have talked about in that article. In the NYC article Zwiefel references they basically say that Americans don't want to tax the rich to death because they hope to rich themselves someday.

    Then, they make a snide remark about "some people" think economic mobility is on the decline. However, in the source materials used, we see that even among the super rich, there's a lot of mobility. Only 25% of the top 400 taxpayers are the same from year to year. People are moving up and out and down. And besides, I don't think people think they're going to be *that* rich, but they do think there's a chance they could make $75-100 grand a year and they certainly don't want to be giving 70% of that to the government.  
     
    #  June 8th, 2005 2:10 PM      no2lefties
    Typical class-warfare, soak-the-rich rhetoric that the Democrats have been serving up for years.

    If liberals like Zwiefel had their way, we'd go back to the Carter years where income taxes on the rich were very very high and the economy was in the tank.  
     
    #  June 8th, 2005 2:10 PM      BrianH
    Capitalism is a wonderful thing isn't it.

    I was listening to Rush on the way to meet my wife for lunch today. Some guy was on trying to defend Howards Dean's bashing of republicans. He kept repeating phrases like "unequal distribution of income". My 14 YO son's comment was "That guy's an idiot." With an 8th grade education, he's smart enough to know that socialism won't work!
     
     
    #  June 9th, 2005 11:37 AM      Zeke
    It's about punishing those who have been successful in life. It's also about the liberals making people dependent on the government for votes and power.  
     
    #  June 9th, 2005 1:58 PM      PackerFan63
    "Oh, where to start?"

    Give it up, Kris! I have given up trying to explain basic economics to people. Walter Williams, a brilliant economics professor, did a great series on everyday economics that you can read here: http://www.jewishworldreview.com/0305/williams_econ9.php3.

    My standard answer? "Read that series, then come back and talk to me."  
     
    #  June 11th, 2005 11:39 PM      mbrlr
    Well, all this certainly made it more progressive for the rich. Back to the 1890s we go and the permanent underclass --- and it's becoming increasingly just that, wishful thinking aside --- will go with everyone on the wonderful ride to perdition.

    Pride goeth before destruction and a haughty spirit goeth before a fall.  
     
    #  June 11th, 2005 11:46 PM      BVBigBro
    Flat tax here we come!  
     
    #  June 12th, 2005 12:17 AM      mbrlr
    God forbid.  
     
    #  June 12th, 2005 12:20 AM      BVBigBro
    The only thing better would be about a 50% reduction in the federal government.  
     
    #  June 12th, 2005 12:21 AM      mbrlr
    Would it surprise you to know I don't agree with that either?  
     
    #  June 12th, 2005 12:27 AM      BVBigBro
    I've seen too much of that outfit in action. It could be done in a heartbeat.

    All a flat tax would really do is eliminate the endless government knows best how you should spend your money (you can deduct this, but you can't that) mentality.  
     

     

     


      page rendered in 0.1127 seconds | ©2004, 2005 Dummocrats.com