Daily Page | Zebrality | 2010 Football Pool | General Chat | Latest Comments

You are on an individual archive page

Click here to return to the main page


Wikipedia does good things. Reward them.

The Daily Links Page
Got a link to submit?
  • Double Rainbow Guy in Windows Live Ad
  • Skeptoid.com on the Myers-Briggs Personality Test
  • New Glarus Brewing invites fans to weigh in on its 2011 beer schedule
  • UW the big loser in Big Ten realignment
       [ 14 comments ]
  • Glee, Flight of the Conchords featured on 9/26 Simpsons premiere
       [ 1 comment ]
  • Zenyatta Stakes reverting to old name meaning Zenyatta will not be able to win the Zenyatta stakes
  • Target to sell Facebook Credits gift cards
  • Officials: Suspect holding hostages at Discovery Channel
       [ 1 comment ]
  • New Big Ten divisions to be announced 7 pm ET tonight
       [ 77 comments ]
  • UEFA enacts vuvuzela ban
  • Blair: Bush world view had 'immense simplicity'
  • Best. Horserace Call. Ever.
       [ 1 comment ]
  • The Media Loses Readers and Viewers to its Own Radicalism
  • Great Debate: Can Rodgers overtake Favre?
       [ 20 comments ]
  • Homeowne's Fight Involves Flag Tied to Tea Party
  • Why Do Heavy Drinkers Outlive Nondrinkers?
       [ 1 comment ]
  • Authorities Were on High Alert for Possible Hijack Attempt
  • Behind the hurricane hype
  • UW-Madison: 17th-best damn university in the whole damn world
  • Social media votes on Aaron Rodgers' beard
       [ 2 comments ]
  • Not so cuddly now: It's claws the psycho squirrel
  • Top 5 Floating Sheep Maps
  • Texas Rep. violated rules, steered scholarships to relatives
  • The smell of freshly-cut grass is actually a plant distress call
  • Why can't Barack Obama tell the world about American tolerance?
  • Anyone Who Wants to Cut Entitlements Clearly Has No Place on a Commission Devoted to Fiscal Responsibility
  • The great Obama-Axelrod-etc. mystery
  • Is the Trade Gap to Blame for Slowing GDP Growth?
  • The six wives of Henry VIII in the movies
       [ 1 comment ]
  • Who's Stupid?
  • Brewers' Gallardo robbed at gunpoint
  • Want to be class president? Not if you're black, in one Miss. school
  • Lance Armstrong Wants To Tell Nation Something But Nation Has To Promise Not To Get Mad
  • Most humble and most arrogant Presidents
       [ 3 comments ]
  • Singles: best soundtrack of the 90's
       [ 1 comment ]
  • Observation Deck: Packers-Colts
  • David Hasselhoff to Compete on ABC's Dancing With the Stars!
  • Solution to the Ground Zero Mosque Dilemma
  • Trapped miners in Chile assuming different roles
  • 'Sportwriters on TV' back on the air ... in Chicago
       [ 2 comments ]
  • Polish man, shot in head, notices five years later
  • Inside the secret world of Trader Joe's
  • Report: Wisconsin & Iowa will be in separate Big Ten divisions
       [ 10 comments ]
  • That buzz you hear? Must be mosquitoes, not interest in Gophers
       [ 2 comments ]
  • Death of a Hero: Brett Favre's Tragic Fall from Grace
  • Rand vs. Ron? Cordoba House Drives Wedge Through The Paul Family
  • Former RNC chairman Ken Mehlman: I'm gay
  • Greeks 'discover Odysseus' palace in Ithaca, proving Homer's hero was real
       [ 3 comments ]
  • Angry Birds eyes a movie/TV deal
  • Coffee shops to customers: get the hell out
       [ 3 comments ]

     

  • The Silly Dramas of High School

       June 13, 2005

    A friend of mine emailed me this passage from the Student Conduct Guidelines at North Canyon High School in Phoenix:

    Try not to engage in all the silly drama that comes with the high school experience. You'll find that in most cases this drama has no meaning or relevance once you're out of school. Pay attention in class and do your homework. You're preparing for your future.

    While the second half of that guideline makes sense, take a look at those first two sentences again. As my friend pointed out: a)That's really vague. Some smart ass high schooler is bound to argue that his/her bit of drama is completely serious and not at all silly and b) Isn't the drama part of high school? Why not start to encourage kids NOT to go to prom... or talk at lunch... or go to football games?

    Public educators talk about wanting to give children the tools they need to succeed in life. For example, here in Madison they proclaim that:

    Every child has...
    • an inexhaustible capacity to learn
    • unique meaning and purpose
    • the capacity to make responsible decisions
    • freedom of thought and expression
    • an obligation for the stewardship of resources
    • potential to create their own future and the future of society
    • the right to realize his / her full potential
    • the right to be safe and to live free from violence and harassment

    That's great. That's what schools should do. But too often I think educators want to teach kids what to think. And North Canyon's guideline takes that a step further. We'll do the thinking and the living for you. Don't bother with all that "drama" of living your life. Your silly, little high school lives and loves are all going to amount to nothing. We're teachers. We know better than you.

    Of course, I realize that no high school kid is going to obey this particular guideline. But this still irritates me to no end. Not only is it far beyond the scope of what schools should advise (whatever happened to parents?), it's also stupid advice in the first place. As my friend said, this guideline is just a waste of ink.


    Posted by at June 13, 2005 07:46 PM

        The trackback entry for this page is : http://www.inthehat.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/954

     

    Trackback Entries

     


    Comments

    #  June 13th, 2005 10:43 PM      Laura
    Geez, don't let my daughter hear that nonsense about freedom of expression. She can think as much as she likes, but the policy around here is that if she wants to express herself, she better write an essay.

    Okay, slightly sarcastic, but not completely... we actually have said that and were only partly joking. In all seriousness, I didn't send her to school to express herself or to output information. I sent her to school to take information in. Sure, some output is necessary to complete the cycle; output shows understanding or lack of. But schools have gotten way too involved with "socialization" as all of those policies show, and education has declined probably at the same rate.

    Kids need an education to succeed. My mother got one in high school, I got one post-high school, and my daughter got practically none at all until I pulled her out and started home-schooling her. All of the drama of goths, preps and jocks, who's screwing whom, I got my nipples pierced, want to see? That 8th grader over there had an abortion, got any weed? We're having an, um, party and we need some more girls, want to come help? (This from a girl who had invited half the baseball team over to be serviced in an effort to be more popular.) Don't those jelly bracelets you wear mean you ___ (fill in the blank with a variety of sex acts)? I heard you said x about y, now her girlfriend is going to kick your ass.

    That crap used to be background noise when I was in school but now it's a dull roar and some kids have a hard time working around it. And this was at a small private school - I have friends with kids in public schools who have more to manage. I suspect that's the kind of drama that they were thinking of when they wrote the conduct guideline, not proms and football games.
    Added: I do agree the guideline is a waste of ink, though.  
     
    #  June 14th, 2005 7:59 AM      JohnTant
    I agree that if anyone ought to be in the position of dismissing a student's concerns as "silly drama," it ought to be the parents and not the school. And think back to when you were in school...finding your niche was anything but a "silly drama." In retrospect I think it was just as important as learning trig. It was a trial run for finding your niche in adult society.  
     

     

     


    To leave a comment you must be logged in.
    Log in here
    or Get an Account here.


      page rendered in 0.2716 seconds | ©2004, 2005 Dummocrats.com