Daily Page | Zebrality | NCAA Pool | General Chat | Latest Comments

You are on an individual archive page

Click here to return to the main page


The Daily Links Page
Got a link to submit?
  • UW band suspended, won't play Saturday's Ohio State game
  • Upset fantasy football player arrested for allegedly threatening to kill roommate
  • Madison burglars say they owe it all to the Discovery Channel
  • Charged as kid in Young slaying, man, 19, now accused in robbery
  • Congress Clears Hotly Contested Bailout Bill
  • Former GOP Congressman's 1996 Prognostication a Tough Reminder
  • WI appeals court throws out drunk driving conviction for man with .259 blood-alcohol content
  • Before That Sex Change, Think About Your Next Paycheck
  • The Obama channel
       [ 1 comment ]
  • Flirting with Palin earns Pakistani president a fatwa
  • Walgreens pulls display of cups, pingpong balls
  • Audio: 'Going, Going, Braun'
  • McCain turns irritable, sarcastic in interview
       [ 3 comments ]
  • Who should throw out the first pitch in Saturday's Brewers game?
  • We Need to Recapitalize the Banks
       [ 3 comments ]
  • The spark that could ignite a revolution
  • Somali Pirates Tell All: They're in It for the Money
  • NFL bust Mandarich says he used steroids at Michigan State
  • Wisconsin man to stand trial for allegedly damaging girlfriend's vehicle
  • Community Organizers for Bad Mortgages
  • It's snowing on Mars
  • House rejects $700B bailout
  • Brewers fans cheer, drink, shop
       [ 3 comments ]
  • Report: 60 Million People You'd Never Talk To Voting For Other Guy
  • EU climate goals under pressure as recession looms
  • George Bush: The Comeback Kid
  • Brewers fans admit they've 'never felt this feeling'
       [ 1 comment ]
  • Video: What's Brewin'
       [ 8 comments ]
  • The week in baseball: Sept. 20-26, 1982
  • Presidential Children Don't Belong in Battle
  • Improving the inevitable big bailout
  • Gov. Blunt Statement on Obama Campaign's Abusive Use of Missouri Law Enforcement
  • Paul Newman Dies at 83
  • Video: Handing out some bailout blame
  • Ten Liberal Movies So Lame They Make Even Democrats Want to Vote Republican
  • Bailout sentiment running 50-50: '50% no and 50% hell no'
  • Obama seeks to take down NRA ad
  • Man Charged With Battery For Farting in Police Officer's General Direction
  • Somali Pirates, a Suspcious Hijacked Iranian Freighter, and a Cargo of Radioactive Death
  • More bailouts - Maryland fisheries
  • Longer Lines = Voter Suppression
  • Obama's 'Gardengate'
  • Could Clinton still come back? Internet buzzes with rumours Biden will be replaced by Hillary as Obama's running mate
  • Schoolhouse Rocks & The Politics of Personal Destruction
  • Lies (and the newspaper that abets a lying liar)
  • Glamour writer mocks Republican's rape claim
       [ 1 comment ]
  • On the Bailout...
  • Millen out as Lions president, GM
  • Presidential debate organizers say going ahead for Friday
  • The bailout blame game

     

  • The Political Totem Pole

       June 02, 2006

    The conventional wisdom in the blogosphere is that if a Republican candidate takes a strong stance against illegal immigration he or she will be on their way to a dominating Presidential victory in 2008. I'm going to challenge that wisdom. While a vast majority of Americans may want a crackdown on illegal immigrants it may not be the most important issue to them.

    You're never going to agree with any political candidate on every issue. There are always issues you have to compromise on when you hit the voting booth. Candidate A may be for lower taxes and small government, but wants to amend the constitution to ban gay marriage. Candidate B thinks amending the constitution for such a petty reason is ridiculous, but she's also for expanding government social services and is really upset with all those "tax cuts for the rich".I'm going to vote for Candidate A. I hate his stance on gay marriage, but we agree on issues that are higher up on my policy totem pole.

    80+% of the public may be all for building a bigass wall on our southern border. But is that more important to them than the War on Terror. Or taxes? Or government spending? Or social security? Or abortion? I don't know. Immigration may be the most important issue to some people, for other people it's further down on their checklist. It might be something they'll compromise on to support a candidate that they mostly agree with.

    It's like American Idol. I loved Elliott, but I didn't really, really love him. I wasn't willing to sacrifice two hours of my time to vote for him. If I took an opinion poll, I'd come out as supporting him 100%, but when the real moment of truth came, he couldn't count on my vote.

    That same scenario might play out with whatever Democrat or Republican finally comes out as the candidate of immigration reform. A lot can happen in two years. By then, many Americans may find that when they're in the privacy of the voting booth, immigration isn't such an important issue after all. Opinion polls don't accurately measure the public's passion on any issue. Elections, on the other hand...


    Posted by kris at June 2, 2006 12:57 PM

        The trackback entry for this page is : http://www.inthehat.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1333

     

    Trackback Entries

     


    Comments

    There are no comments for this story.

     

    yet.

     

     


    To leave a comment you must be logged in.
    Log in here
    or Get an Account here.