You are on an individual archive page

Click here to return to the main page


Wikipedia does good things. Reward them.

The Daily Links Page
Got a link to submit?
  • New Evidence Proves First Flag Made By Betsy Ross Actually Shirt For Gay Friend
  • Colbert Leads Huntsman in S.C.
  • Polish prosecutor 'shoots self after news conference'
  • Jim Rome leaving ESPN. Bonus: Footage of Jim Rome getting attacked by Jim Everett & crying like a baby
  • Broncos, Tim Tebow stun Steelers in OT, win 29-23 in NFL playoffs
       [ 2 comments ]
  • Video: Remember 2008
       [ 1 comment ]
  • Beezow Doo-Doo Zopittybop-Bop-Bop faces weapon and drug charges
  • Video: Green Bay anchorman loves lamp
  • Video: Rodgers & Raji in the new Discount Double Check ad
  • Jim Rome: out of The Jungle and onto the (horse) farm
  • New IL Law Requires Photo ID To Buy Drain Cleaner
  • Fawn Cuddles Kitten, Hearts Explode
  • The priest who changed the course of history for the worse... by rescuing four-year-old Hitler from drowning in icy river
  • Get Fit or Get Fined: Web Service Offers to Charge You for Skipping the Gym
  • Fine proposed for botching US national anthem
  • Why Best Buy is Going out of Business...Gradually
       [ 1 comment ]
  • Edina boutique takes heat for trashing $4,000-plus gowns
  • Law Student Goes 'Homeless by Choice' Touts Value of Gym Club Membership
  • VIDEO: Snoop Dogg on 'The Price Is Right'
  • Flynn and Out
       [ 3 comments ]
  • Don't put Bielema on the firing line
       [ 1 comment ]
  • Your end of the season Vikings comment thread
       [ 2 comments ]
  • Mass. budget motel fights forfeiture by feds
  • Vikings scrutinize downtown Mpls. stadium site near basilica
       [ 2 comments ]
  • Kelly Clarkson criticized on Twitter after singer endorses Ron Paul for President 
  • Political Predictions for 2012
  • We're All Doing The Best We Can
  • Video Of Little Girl Getting Pissed Off About Pink Toys Will Make Your Heart Swell
  • The 10 best sports-related Hitler Reactions of 2011
  • Happy Endings on the housing crisis
  • Why You Just Got New York Times Spam
  • There Will Be No Friday This Week In Samoa
  • The Most Hipster State In The US
  • Online Merchants Home in on Imbibing Consumers
       [ 1 comment ]
  • On islamic fashion
       [ 1 comment ]
  • Sears as Lampert's 'Mismanaged Asset' Loses Customers to Macy's
       [ 1 comment ]
  • 5 social network predictions for 2012
  • Cheetah, chimp star of classic Tarzan movies, dies at 80
  • The Hottest Things on TV in 2011
  • Beer in cans: It's not just for Bud anymore
  • Seven Packers earn Pro Bowl selections
  • The Worst Angry Christmas Tweets In the World
       [ 2 comments ]
  • Minnesota cities try to hold back on rented housing
  • Why Iowa Shouldn't Vote First Anymore
  • Some Falcons Players Upset Drew Brees Went For The Record Last Night
  • We've Identified Jilted Packergirl
  • With its 'W' initiative, ESPN tries to solve the equation of serving women sports fans
       [ 2 comments ]
  • Owner surprised to find cat regularly catches bus
  • Charles Barkley: Skip Bayless Has Surpassed Peter Vecsey As The Biggest Jackass In The History Of Journalism
  • Handicapping the 2011 NFL MVP Race, 2.0

     

  • Who's to Blame for 9/11?

       September 10, 2006

    With Dems in an uproar about ABC's "Path to 9/11" show tonight, I thought it'd be a good time to review who we should be pointing our fingers at with regards to 9/11. Bill Clinton, complete with a blue dress-clad Monica Lewinsky in his lap, didn't ram a plane into the World Trade Center. George W. Bush, Dick Cheney and Karl Rove didn't plan the whole thing one night in order to further their plans to steal all the world's oil. The people responsible for 9/11 are Osama bin Laden, the 19 hijackers, and the rest of AQ.

    As much as I despised Clinton's foreign policy team, I find it hard to get too upset at them over 9/11. The American people didn't give a crap about fighting terrorism in the 1990s either. We didn't think that the first World Trade Center bombing was a big deal. The African embassy bombings didn't really concern us. Oh sure, it would have been nice to catch the guys who did it, but it wasn't a national priority. We didn't really care. At the time, our government was doing exactly what we wanted them to: not much.

    If the CIA had snatched OBL from Afghanistan, the Left would have been up in arms about Clinton's "irresponsible unilateral action" while the Right would have sneered about how this was just a distraction from the real issue: whether or not Clinton lied about getting it on with everyone's favorite trashy intern.

    Why is it so difficult to understand that 9/11 changed everything. I don't think we should judge either the Clinton or Bush administration's actions through post-9/11 lens. That's not to say we should ignore their inaction, but rather that we should remember that our world was forever divided five years ago into "before" and "after".


    Posted by at September 10, 2006 11:15 AM

        The trackback entry for this page is : http://www.inthehat.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1380

     

    Trackback Entries

     


    Comments

    #  September 10th, 2006 4:02 PM      themandownthehall
    That's fair Kris. No problem with that. What's not fair is the Democrats refusing to even acknowledge that things were different before 9/11. That they were so serious when we know they were not. When OBL nails the US several times in the 90's and they do nothing, then try to blame Bush for not being able to shut down a plot in less than 8 months, that's unreasonable. When the Democrats stack the 9/11 commission with the very administration officials that should have been on the hot seat testifying, it's time to call shenanigans. The path to 9/11 may not be completely accurate. And I have no problem having the incorrect scenes removed, but let's face reality. The only reason they are screaming is they don't like the potiential impact on the November elections. The 9/11 commission, their reaction to fahrenheit 911, their recently released reports on Iraq show that the truth is farthest from what they care about.
     
     
    #  September 11th, 2006 8:23 AM      BVBigBro
    The fact that things were different before 911 is the biggest problem I have with the 911 commission. Prior to 911 what would someone have had to do to make you call the FBI? They're the ones who get a free ride in the commission report.

    I haven't heard Clinton saying Terrorism was a priority during his administration themandownthehall. If he did he should be called on it.

    As president I agree that his actions were in line with public desires with the exception that he certainly could have acted against Bin Laden personally without suffering any domestic consequences. Bin Laden was a nobody to most people on 910, but there would have been no call from the left about unilateral action.  
     
    #  September 11th, 2006 9:12 AM      Laura
    I think the thing to focus on is what's been happening *since* 9/11. Which candidates - which parties - which ideologies - have done more to acknowledge the problem (radical Islam, Islamofascism, whatever you want to call it) and implement realistic ways to combat it?  
     
    #  October 23rd, 2006 11:12 AM      mbrlr
    The radicals who crashed the planes are to blame.

    Did Clinton fail to get bin Laden? Yes, although attempts were made.

    Was Bush warned about the possibility of a strike against the US? Yes.

    Did our President-by-uncitable-SC-opinion-who-believes-god-picked-him pay attention? No.

    Have we gotten bin Laden yet? No.

    Are we trying? Not really.

    Did Iraq, which we then invaded on false pretenses, have anything to do with 9/11? No.

    Should, in a perfect world, there be impeachments to bring some clarity to this mess and also lower a bit of extremely unChristian hubris? Yes, but that won't happen.

    Will Democrats take both the Senate & the House? We'll see.  
     
    #  November 9th, 2006 1:17 PM      mbrlr
    Re the last point made in my last response here:

    We saw, and at least from some of our perspectives, it was good.  
     
    #  November 9th, 2006 3:14 PM      REV
    It is precisely those kind of LIBERAL LIES that went UN-REFUTED by Conservative Candidates that cost the G.O.P. this elecation. It was NOT "issues" because the DNC LIED about where they stand on the issues AND the Left's "Big-Guns" Nazi Pelosi, Ted "Chappaquidick" Kennedy, Barney 'NAMBLA" Frank and Jack "Cut-n-Run" Murtha were SILENT and INVISIBLE for 2-3 weeks before the election! IF Liberalism-Leftism is so "good" then why didn't the DNC with ONE voice trumpet their REAL agenda?!! Hmmmm?!!!  
     

     

     


      page rendered in 0.0616 seconds | ©2004, 2005 Dummocrats.com