Ron Paul's debate performances brought a lot of attention to a candidate that would have otherwise been ignored as a fringe player in the 2008 presidential election. Whether or not you like Paul, this is a good thing. This is the part of the election cycle when all points of view should be heard. We don't need the media or the party big wigs acting as idea gatekeepers.

What I think we do need are more and more debates between now and November 2008. Much like the internet, debates help level the playing field between candidates with deep pockets and those with more dreams than dollars. What I'd like to do is change our election laws so that presidential candidates have to participate in a series of frequent and regular debates. Participation in debates would be restricted to candidates who have obtained a certain number of signatures supporting their candidacy. Different states and organizations could figure out how exactly to run their debate. The point is to give voters a chance to see every candidate and hear what they have to say.

To be sure, this would be a significant burden on candidates. I'm thinking that there could be a debate a week for a year. But after all, they are running for President. It's an important job. I think they can show up once a week to talk about it.

What it comes down to is this: I'd rather have election reform that puts restrictions on candidates than "reform" that puts restrictions on voters. So what do you think about doing away with McCain/Feingold and embracing this plan? Crazy??