You are on an individual archive page

Click here to return to the main page

Wikipedia does good things. Reward them.

The Daily Links Page
Got a link to submit?
  • New Evidence Proves First Flag Made By Betsy Ross Actually Shirt For Gay Friend
  • Colbert Leads Huntsman in S.C.
  • Polish prosecutor 'shoots self after news conference'
  • Jim Rome leaving ESPN. Bonus: Footage of Jim Rome getting attacked by Jim Everett & crying like a baby
  • Broncos, Tim Tebow stun Steelers in OT, win 29-23 in NFL playoffs
  • Video: Remember 2008
       [ 1 comment ]
  • Beezow Doo-Doo Zopittybop-Bop-Bop faces weapon and drug charges
  • Video: Green Bay anchorman loves lamp
  • Video: Rodgers & Raji in the new Discount Double Check ad
  • Jim Rome: out of The Jungle and onto the (horse) farm
  • New IL Law Requires Photo ID To Buy Drain Cleaner
  • Fawn Cuddles Kitten, Hearts Explode
  • The priest who changed the course of history for the worse... by rescuing four-year-old Hitler from drowning in icy river
  • Get Fit or Get Fined: Web Service Offers to Charge You for Skipping the Gym
  • Fine proposed for botching US national anthem
  • Why Best Buy is Going out of Business...Gradually
       [ 1 comment ]
  • Edina boutique takes heat for trashing $4,000-plus gowns
  • Law Student Goes 'Homeless by Choice' Touts Value of Gym Club Membership
  • VIDEO: Snoop Dogg on 'The Price Is Right'
  • Flynn and Out
  • Don't put Bielema on the firing line
       [ 1 comment ]
  • Your end of the season Vikings comment thread
  • Mass. budget motel fights forfeiture by feds
  • Vikings scrutinize downtown Mpls. stadium site near basilica
  • Kelly Clarkson criticized on Twitter after singer endorses Ron Paul for President 
  • Political Predictions for 2012
  • We're All Doing The Best We Can
  • Video Of Little Girl Getting Pissed Off About Pink Toys Will Make Your Heart Swell
  • The 10 best sports-related Hitler Reactions of 2011
  • Happy Endings on the housing crisis
  • Why You Just Got New York Times Spam
  • There Will Be No Friday This Week In Samoa
  • The Most Hipster State In The US
  • Online Merchants Home in on Imbibing Consumers
       [ 1 comment ]
  • On islamic fashion
       [ 1 comment ]
  • Sears as Lampert's 'Mismanaged Asset' Loses Customers to Macy's
       [ 1 comment ]
  • 5 social network predictions for 2012
  • Cheetah, chimp star of classic Tarzan movies, dies at 80
  • The Hottest Things on TV in 2011
  • Beer in cans: It's not just for Bud anymore
  • Seven Packers earn Pro Bowl selections
  • The Worst Angry Christmas Tweets In the World
  • Minnesota cities try to hold back on rented housing
  • Why Iowa Shouldn't Vote First Anymore
  • Some Falcons Players Upset Drew Brees Went For The Record Last Night
  • We've Identified Jilted Packergirl
  • With its 'W' initiative, ESPN tries to solve the equation of serving women sports fans
  • Owner surprised to find cat regularly catches bus
  • Charles Barkley: Skip Bayless Has Surpassed Peter Vecsey As The Biggest Jackass In The History Of Journalism
  • Handicapping the 2011 NFL MVP Race, 2.0


  • Another Reason to Vote for Ron Paul

       December 07, 2007

    We had a new user register for the site yesterday who described her views as “Generally a fiscal conservative and a social moderate, closer to Libertarian, although firmly believes that the government does serve a purpose and that the US should be involved in the rest of the world, at least a little.” That’s pretty much how I feel. That last part is what keeps me from really being a gung ho Ron Paul supporter.

    However, there are times when a vote for Dr. Paul seems like it really would be a vote to “save America”. Yesterday the House passed the SAFE-Act, which says that:

    anyone offering an open Wi-Fi connection to the public must report illegal images including "obscene" cartoons and drawings--or face fines of up to $300,000.

    That broad definition would cover individuals, coffee shops, libraries, hotels, and even some government agencies that provide Wi-Fi. It also sweeps in social-networking sites, domain name registrars, Internet service providers, and e-mail service providers such as Hotmail and Gmail, and it may require that the complete contents of the user's account be retained for subsequent police inspection.

    By most accounts this bill is both redundant and unworkable. It also reinforces my opinion that a President or politician is better off understanding the internet than understanding Einstein’s general and special theory of relativity.

    So what does this have to do with Ron Paul? Well, the bill passed by a vote of 409-2. Do you even need to look to know that Paul was one of the 2? Throughout his career Paul has been the lone voice crying out in the wilderness. Maybe the NY Times will write another hit piece on him and use this vote to claim that Paul is “soft on pedophiles”, but when I’m standing in the voting booth I’ll remember that Ron Paul consistently votes against legislation that’s meaningless, unworkable and violates our rights in the guise of security. That may be enough to sway me – and I’m not alone.

    Posted by at December 7, 2007 09:49 AM

        The trackback entry for this page is :


    Trackback Entries



    #  December 7th, 2007 9:55 AM      BVBigBro
    Who was the other?  
    #  December 7th, 2007 9:57 AM      kris
    Paul Broun, a Republican from Georgia - I also fixed the link, so you can see the roll call now.  
    #  December 7th, 2007 8:07 PM      BVBigBro
    I like Ron Paul, but his isolationism is the big problem for me. I don't know that I can get past it. Fred Thompson has potential, but I need to to see and hear more. Beyond those two, there are no major candidates I have many positive feelings for.  
    #  December 9th, 2007 1:04 AM      james
    ron paul isn't an isolationist. he supports free trade and diplomacy with all nations.

    he is "non-interventionist," however, and believes that america should not be fighting in foreign wars that don't directly threaten the american state.

    what makes you think that he is an isolationist?  
    #  December 9th, 2007 7:46 AM      BVBigBro
    His own statements are isolationist. He does not support NAFTA and other multinational organizations. Foreign policy under himwould be isolationist, and that has consequences.  
    #  December 10th, 2007 8:23 PM      james
    I'm not going to pretend to know a lot about NAFTA, but I will point out that a lack of support for NAFTA doesn't necessarily equate to an isolationist agenda. Think of it like this: I am against "hate crime" enhancers, but I support laws prohibiting the murder of any person. Or: I support equal opportunities for all people, irrespective of race, but I'm decidedly against and & all affirmative action programs.

    Like Ron Paul, I'm not a big fan of the UN, because I believe that it infringes on American sovereignty. Each and every power that the US government holds was granted to it by the people. (This is a very different situation than present in other world governments, most of which trace their source of power to a king or other dictator. ) As such, the government must always be accountable to the people. An organization like the UN not only destroys that link to the people, but it seizes it as well.

    Ron Paul's opposition to NAFTA is based on his view that it takes power away from the American people. I'm inclined to think that he is right, as I've read that several state legislatures have passed unanimous resolutions opposing the agreement. If a trade agreement with another nation is preventing citizens and states from controlling their own government, then the trade agreement has to go.  



      page rendered in 0.0391 seconds | ©2004, 2005