Daily Page | Zebrality | 2010 Football Pool | General Chat | Latest Comments

You are on an individual archive page

Click here to return to the main page


Wikipedia does good things. Reward them.

The Daily Links Page
Got a link to submit?
  • Double Rainbow Guy in Windows Live Ad
  • Skeptoid.com on the Myers-Briggs Personality Test
  • New Glarus Brewing invites fans to weigh in on its 2011 beer schedule
  • UW the big loser in Big Ten realignment
       [ 14 comments ]
  • Glee, Flight of the Conchords featured on 9/26 Simpsons premiere
       [ 1 comment ]
  • Zenyatta Stakes reverting to old name meaning Zenyatta will not be able to win the Zenyatta stakes
  • Target to sell Facebook Credits gift cards
  • Officials: Suspect holding hostages at Discovery Channel
       [ 1 comment ]
  • New Big Ten divisions to be announced 7 pm ET tonight
       [ 77 comments ]
  • UEFA enacts vuvuzela ban
  • Blair: Bush world view had 'immense simplicity'
  • Best. Horserace Call. Ever.
       [ 1 comment ]
  • The Media Loses Readers and Viewers to its Own Radicalism
  • Great Debate: Can Rodgers overtake Favre?
       [ 20 comments ]
  • Homeowne's Fight Involves Flag Tied to Tea Party
  • Why Do Heavy Drinkers Outlive Nondrinkers?
       [ 1 comment ]
  • Authorities Were on High Alert for Possible Hijack Attempt
  • Behind the hurricane hype
  • UW-Madison: 17th-best damn university in the whole damn world
  • Social media votes on Aaron Rodgers' beard
       [ 2 comments ]
  • Not so cuddly now: It's claws the psycho squirrel
  • Top 5 Floating Sheep Maps
  • Texas Rep. violated rules, steered scholarships to relatives
  • The smell of freshly-cut grass is actually a plant distress call
  • Why can't Barack Obama tell the world about American tolerance?
  • Anyone Who Wants to Cut Entitlements Clearly Has No Place on a Commission Devoted to Fiscal Responsibility
  • The great Obama-Axelrod-etc. mystery
  • Is the Trade Gap to Blame for Slowing GDP Growth?
  • The six wives of Henry VIII in the movies
       [ 1 comment ]
  • Who's Stupid?
  • Brewers' Gallardo robbed at gunpoint
  • Want to be class president? Not if you're black, in one Miss. school
  • Lance Armstrong Wants To Tell Nation Something But Nation Has To Promise Not To Get Mad
  • Most humble and most arrogant Presidents
       [ 3 comments ]
  • Singles: best soundtrack of the 90's
       [ 1 comment ]
  • Observation Deck: Packers-Colts
  • David Hasselhoff to Compete on ABC's Dancing With the Stars!
  • Solution to the Ground Zero Mosque Dilemma
  • Trapped miners in Chile assuming different roles
  • 'Sportwriters on TV' back on the air ... in Chicago
       [ 2 comments ]
  • Polish man, shot in head, notices five years later
  • Inside the secret world of Trader Joe's
  • Report: Wisconsin & Iowa will be in separate Big Ten divisions
       [ 10 comments ]
  • That buzz you hear? Must be mosquitoes, not interest in Gophers
       [ 2 comments ]
  • Death of a Hero: Brett Favre's Tragic Fall from Grace
  • Rand vs. Ron? Cordoba House Drives Wedge Through The Paul Family
  • Former RNC chairman Ken Mehlman: I'm gay
  • Greeks 'discover Odysseus' palace in Ithaca, proving Homer's hero was real
       [ 3 comments ]
  • Angry Birds eyes a movie/TV deal
  • Coffee shops to customers: get the hell out
       [ 3 comments ]

     

  • Hillary Clinton: Expired?

       December 16, 2007

    Eric from the Viking Pundit reminded me of the “Rule of 14”. To summarize, the Rule of 14 says:

    With only one exception since the presidency of Theodore Roosevelt, no one has been elected president who took more than 14 years to climb from his first major elective office to election as either president or vice president.

    A major elective office is defined as governorship, Congress, or the mayoralty of a big city. As soon as someone is elected to one of those offices, the clock starts ticking. I looked up the 2008 candidates (well, all of the ones who will be on the Wisconsin ballot) and found that the Rule of 14 disqualifies everyone except: Rudy Giuliani, Mike Huckabee, Mitt Romney, Tom Tancredo, Fred Thompson, Hillary Clinton, John Edwards and Barack Obama. Since all of the front runners are on that list, it’s hardly insightful this time around.

    The theory around the Rule of 14 is that Americans like “fresh” candidates. We want someone with some experience, but not a President that we know too well. They’re stale. Their flaws are all too evident.

    According to the Rule, Hillary Clinton is “fresh”, but is she? The Clintons boasted that they offered a unique “two for one” deal for America in 1992. I think Clinton’s clock starting ticking in 1992, not with her election to the Senate in 2000. By that measure, she’s expired. She feels stale. As the Viking Pundit says, we already know her all too well.


    Posted by at December 16, 2007 09:54 AM

        The trackback entry for this page is : http://www.inthehat.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1577

     

    Trackback Entries

     


    Comments

    #  December 16th, 2007 5:54 PM      themandownthehall
    The Clintons are like herpes. They NEVER go away and can never be counted out. Hillary will never be out of it. The Clinton machine is one of the most incredible political machines ever seen. Nothing negative sticks and everything spun posative stays. If Bush had half the ability to spin, control the news and speak like that machine, we would be talking about the next Reagan leaving. It blows me away.

    For all the talk of her falling, she still leads nationally over Obama and, more importantly, in each state over Obama. She will win the nomination easily. We'll be amazed yet again at how the Clinton machine rolled over everyone just when it seemed stuck.

    I don't know how they will make her likable to the general pop, but they will and she will win the general election.  
     

     

     


    To leave a comment you must be logged in.
    Log in here
    or Get an Account here.


      page rendered in 0.2486 seconds | ©2004, 2005 Dummocrats.com