Daily Page | Zebrality | NCAA Pool | General Chat | Latest Comments

You are on an individual archive page

Click here to return to the main page


Wikipedia does good things. Reward them.

The Daily Links Page
Got a link to submit?
  • Man marries pillow
  • Chocolate-powered racecar makes sustainability sexy
  • Residents flee Angolan village invaded by elephants
  • New York Considers Legislation to Ban Salt in Restaurants
  • Dear Howard Stern, Stop Pretending Like You Care About Gabourey Sidibe's Health
  • CNN Sees Facebook As Major Competitor
  • Report: NFL Draft Prospect Once Put His Tremendous Upside In His Sister
  • 10 critical pieces of information in the trailer for the Twilight trailer
  • 2010 NFL Wonderlic test scores
       [ 1 comment ]
  • White Sorority Wins Step Competition, Then Told 'Not Quite'
  • 119 words and phrases WGN staff can't say on the air
       [ 5 comments ]
  • The 90 Types of Bitches
       [ 1 comment ]
  • Actor Corey Haim dies at age 38
  • Google Maps Adds Bike Directions
  • List Of Subscriber Fees Shows What You Pay For Channels You Hate
       [ 3 comments ]
  • Rick Rolling: 2010 Style
  • Lindsay Lohan Sues E-Trade for $100M Over Milkaholic Boyfriend-Stealing Baby Ad
  • Robert De Niro to portray Vince Lombardi in future ESPN movie
  • McDonald's Investors Lovin' It
  • Hamas bans men from women's hair salons in Gaza
  • Curling or quidditch? Test your broom sport knowledge
  • Is Stumptown the New Starbucks - Or Better?
       [ 3 comments ]
  • Magnitude 5.9 Quake Hits Turkey. Doomsday Upon Us???
  • What If Everybody in Canada Flushed At Once?
  • Vikings players will take on NFL's drug policy in trial set to begin on Monday in Minnesota
  • Catholic School Rejects Child Because Of Lesbian Parents
  • The beer belly of America
       [ 3 comments ]
  • How the Constitution, filtered by the high court, affects guns
  • The Old Mistress
  • Defectors Say Church of Scientology Hides Abuse
  • Consent of the governed - and the lack thereof
  • Patriot Games (or how some Canadian liberals are just as self-loathing as their American counterparts)
       [ 1 comment ]
  • 1928 Scientific Breakthroughs For The Home: Teakettle With Lid, Serrated Knife, Salad Spinner
  • Ben Roethlisberger Accused of another Sexual Assault
  • Google Responds To Privacy Concerns With Unsettlingly Specific Apology
  • American Idol: The Color Wars?
  • Wisconsin Vision signs deal with Danny Gokey
  • Police arrest man suspected of stalking Dr. Drew
  • Favre slings same BS on Leno
  • Why the internet will fail (from 1995)
  • Zito hits Fielder in retaliation for last year's bowling pin celebration
       [ 4 comments ]
  • Johnny Weir Talks About Skating Politics, Lady Gaga and Life After the Olympics
  • GRAND JURY TO INDICT JOHN EDWARDS
  • Chile Quake Moved Earth's Axis
  • Football Team Doesn't Like The News, So They Steal The Newspaper
  • Inside the Foaling Barn: A Five-Day Diary
  • The Hard and the Soft of Norwegians
  • The Olympics: What London Can Learn from Vancouver
       [ 1 comment ]
  • Dallas-Fort Worth sports columnist compares Canadian patriotism to Nazi Germany
  • New Battle of Bosworth Field site revealed
       [ 9 comments ]

     

  • Are we dinosaurs?

       November 24, 2008

    In the midst of one of my mental rants against "60s liberals", I suddenly realized that the start of the Reagan era was nearly 28 years ago. The 1980s are just as relevant to college kids today as the 1960s were to me. In other words, they're completely irrelevant.

    In my political science classes (even at the liberal University of Wisconsin), the ideas of the 1960s were dead. They weren't even worth studying. They were swept aside in the giddy culmination of the Cold War.

    While people like Christine Todd Whitman are rightly bitching about the state of the GOP, that's all that they're doing. Bitching. The reasonable wing of the Republican party is resting on the wilted laurels of the Reagan years.

    Too many people have no idea what those ideas even are anymore. It took Reagan nearly 20 years to reap the benefits of the seeds of conservatism he sowed with his radio addresses in the 1960s and 1970s.

    I really don't think the GOP needs new ideas so much as it needs to rearticulate and reinterpret the Reagan revolution to meet the concerns of the next generation. If it fails to do that, it really will go the way of the dinosaur (or at least the Whigs).

    Are the 1980s just as irrelevant as the 1960s?
    Yes
    No
    What, what? The 60s are irrelevant? Blasphemy!
      
    pollcode.com free polls

    Posted by kris at November 24, 2008 09:36 PM

        The trackback entry for this page is : http://www.inthehat.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1691

     

    Trackback Entries

     


    Comments

    #  November 25th, 2008 5:20 PM      BVBigBro
    The GOP is now in exile. The image of Reagan may be far more compelling to a party in exile.  
     

     

     


    To leave a comment you must be logged in.
    Log in here
    or Get an Account here.


      page rendered in 0.7983 seconds | ©2004, 2005 Dummocrats.com