Daily Page | Zebrality | NCAA Pool | General Chat | Latest Comments

You are on an individual archive page

Click here to return to the main page


Wikipedia does good things. Reward them.

The Daily Links Page
Got a link to submit?
  • Love in a cold climate lethal for couple
  • Obama's Bracket
  • A 16-hour flightmare
  • The 10 Greatest Anti-Heroes: #5 Malcolm Reynolds
  • Green Bay's most stolen sign: 'Mullet Place'
       [ 1 comment ]
  • American Idol Rolling Stones Night Winners and Losers
  • St. Patrick's Day: Why do we wear green?
  • Man marries pillow
  • Chocolate-powered racecar makes sustainability sexy
  • Residents flee Angolan village invaded by elephants
  • New York Considers Legislation to Ban Salt in Restaurants
  • Dear Howard Stern, Stop Pretending Like You Care About Gabourey Sidibe's Health
  • CNN Sees Facebook As Major Competitor
  • Report: NFL Draft Prospect Once Put His Tremendous Upside In His Sister
  • 10 critical pieces of information in the trailer for the Twilight trailer
  • 2010 NFL Wonderlic test scores
       [ 1 comment ]
  • White Sorority Wins Step Competition, Then Told 'Not Quite'
  • 119 words and phrases WGN staff can't say on the air
       [ 5 comments ]
  • The 90 Types of Bitches
       [ 1 comment ]
  • Actor Corey Haim dies at age 38
  • Google Maps Adds Bike Directions
  • List Of Subscriber Fees Shows What You Pay For Channels You Hate
       [ 3 comments ]
  • Rick Rolling: 2010 Style
  • Lindsay Lohan Sues E-Trade for $100M Over Milkaholic Boyfriend-Stealing Baby Ad
  • Robert De Niro to portray Vince Lombardi in future ESPN movie
  • McDonald's Investors Lovin' It
  • Hamas bans men from women's hair salons in Gaza
  • Curling or quidditch? Test your broom sport knowledge
  • Is Stumptown the New Starbucks - Or Better?
       [ 3 comments ]
  • Magnitude 5.9 Quake Hits Turkey. Doomsday Upon Us???
  • What If Everybody in Canada Flushed At Once?
  • Vikings players will take on NFL's drug policy in trial set to begin on Monday in Minnesota
  • Catholic School Rejects Child Because Of Lesbian Parents
  • The beer belly of America
       [ 3 comments ]
  • How the Constitution, filtered by the high court, affects guns
  • The Old Mistress
  • Defectors Say Church of Scientology Hides Abuse
  • Consent of the governed - and the lack thereof
  • Patriot Games (or how some Canadian liberals are just as self-loathing as their American counterparts)
       [ 1 comment ]
  • 1928 Scientific Breakthroughs For The Home: Teakettle With Lid, Serrated Knife, Salad Spinner
  • Ben Roethlisberger Accused of another Sexual Assault
  • Google Responds To Privacy Concerns With Unsettlingly Specific Apology
  • American Idol: The Color Wars?
  • Wisconsin Vision signs deal with Danny Gokey
  • Police arrest man suspected of stalking Dr. Drew
  • Favre slings same BS on Leno
  • Why the internet will fail (from 1995)
  • Zito hits Fielder in retaliation for last year's bowling pin celebration
       [ 4 comments ]
  • Johnny Weir Talks About Skating Politics, Lady Gaga and Life After the Olympics
  • GRAND JURY TO INDICT JOHN EDWARDS

     

  • The GOP is dead. Long live the GOP (or not)

       May 12, 2009

    Time Magazine's cover story this week breathlessly wonders if the GOP is an endangered species.

    I doubt it. The political fortunes of each of our only slightly different major parties shift from election to election. The GOP is no more dead than the Democrats were in 1994 or 2002. Sometimes I think our view of history is so limited. Sweeping changes don't happen overnight. In fact, sweeping changes rarely even happen in the course of 6 or 7 years, unless we're talking about the plague.

    Anyway, speaking of plagues, since our two major parties basically offer voters small variations on the overall theme of "Yay! Government!" it's hard to imagine that just one of them could be radically out of step with the voting public. Sadly, they're not. McCain got 46% of the vote. That's not a dead party, that's a losing party, and those are two different things.

    The Time article takes the position that the Republican party stands for "strong defense, traditional values and economic conservatism". Really? If that's the case, then good riddance. I mean, sadly, that really is the case. So, the problem isn't that the American public has suddenly shifted from the right to the left, it's that the Republican party shifted from the right to the further right.

    What I mean to say is that I debate what Time claims the essential Republican values are. Maybe some people think that being a conservative means that, but I don't. I don't think Barry Goldwater or Ronald Reagan thought so either. "Economic conservatism" is not the same as small government.

    To put it simply, I don't think the American public suddenly fell out of love with conservatism. I think, rather, that the Republican party bastardized the idea of conservatism and turned into something that was big government and "values" driven.

    I truly believe that the traditional definition of conservatism, a la Barry Goldwater and Ronald Reagan, is still something that's extremely appealing to the American electorate. The problem is that the GOP has strayed so far away from that that they're now nothing more than liberals in preacher's clothing.

    The GOP might be dead (for now), but don't go throwing out conservatism with the Bush bathwater.


    Posted by kris at May 12, 2009 10:38 PM

        The trackback entry for this page is : http://www.inthehat.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1724

     

    Trackback Entries

     


    Comments

    There are no comments for this story.

     

    yet.

     

     


    To leave a comment you must be logged in.
    Log in here
    or Get an Account here.


      page rendered in 0.2637 seconds | ©2004, 2005 Dummocrats.com