Daily Page | Zebrality | 2010 Football Pool | General Chat | Latest Comments

You are on an individual archive page

Click here to return to the main page


Wikipedia does good things. Reward them.

The Daily Links Page
Got a link to submit?
  • Double Rainbow Guy in Windows Live Ad
  • Skeptoid.com on the Myers-Briggs Personality Test
  • New Glarus Brewing invites fans to weigh in on its 2011 beer schedule
  • UW the big loser in Big Ten realignment
       [ 14 comments ]
  • Glee, Flight of the Conchords featured on 9/26 Simpsons premiere
       [ 1 comment ]
  • Zenyatta Stakes reverting to old name meaning Zenyatta will not be able to win the Zenyatta stakes
  • Target to sell Facebook Credits gift cards
  • Officials: Suspect holding hostages at Discovery Channel
       [ 1 comment ]
  • New Big Ten divisions to be announced 7 pm ET tonight
       [ 77 comments ]
  • UEFA enacts vuvuzela ban
  • Blair: Bush world view had 'immense simplicity'
  • Best. Horserace Call. Ever.
       [ 1 comment ]
  • The Media Loses Readers and Viewers to its Own Radicalism
  • Great Debate: Can Rodgers overtake Favre?
       [ 20 comments ]
  • Homeowne's Fight Involves Flag Tied to Tea Party
  • Why Do Heavy Drinkers Outlive Nondrinkers?
       [ 1 comment ]
  • Authorities Were on High Alert for Possible Hijack Attempt
  • Behind the hurricane hype
  • UW-Madison: 17th-best damn university in the whole damn world
  • Social media votes on Aaron Rodgers' beard
       [ 2 comments ]
  • Not so cuddly now: It's claws the psycho squirrel
  • Top 5 Floating Sheep Maps
  • Texas Rep. violated rules, steered scholarships to relatives
  • The smell of freshly-cut grass is actually a plant distress call
  • Why can't Barack Obama tell the world about American tolerance?
  • Anyone Who Wants to Cut Entitlements Clearly Has No Place on a Commission Devoted to Fiscal Responsibility
  • The great Obama-Axelrod-etc. mystery
  • Is the Trade Gap to Blame for Slowing GDP Growth?
  • The six wives of Henry VIII in the movies
       [ 1 comment ]
  • Who's Stupid?
  • Brewers' Gallardo robbed at gunpoint
  • Want to be class president? Not if you're black, in one Miss. school
  • Lance Armstrong Wants To Tell Nation Something But Nation Has To Promise Not To Get Mad
  • Most humble and most arrogant Presidents
       [ 3 comments ]
  • Singles: best soundtrack of the 90's
       [ 1 comment ]
  • Observation Deck: Packers-Colts
  • David Hasselhoff to Compete on ABC's Dancing With the Stars!
  • Solution to the Ground Zero Mosque Dilemma
  • Trapped miners in Chile assuming different roles
  • 'Sportwriters on TV' back on the air ... in Chicago
       [ 2 comments ]
  • Polish man, shot in head, notices five years later
  • Inside the secret world of Trader Joe's
  • Report: Wisconsin & Iowa will be in separate Big Ten divisions
       [ 10 comments ]
  • That buzz you hear? Must be mosquitoes, not interest in Gophers
       [ 2 comments ]
  • Death of a Hero: Brett Favre's Tragic Fall from Grace
  • Rand vs. Ron? Cordoba House Drives Wedge Through The Paul Family
  • Former RNC chairman Ken Mehlman: I'm gay
  • Greeks 'discover Odysseus' palace in Ithaca, proving Homer's hero was real
       [ 3 comments ]
  • Angry Birds eyes a movie/TV deal
  • Coffee shops to customers: get the hell out
       [ 3 comments ]

     

  • Twitter Ban: ESPN has it (partially) right

       August 10, 2009

    I've been quick to mock the mainstream media as being out of touch with the internet, but I think ESPN is almost dead on with its new Twitter ban.

    Two things separate ESPN from any other sports fan: access and journalistic standards.

    Before you roll your eyes at the words "journalistic standards", think about Michael Jackson's death. You may have read about it in some social media forum or at TMZ, but you didn't really believe it until CNN, the networks and the LA Times confirmed it, did you?

    It doesn't make sense for ESPN to allow its reporters to post juicy gossip and scoops on non-advertising supported non-ESPN sites. At best, it devalues ESPN's own content and makes the reporter, rather than the network, (whose access ESPN provides) the news source and at worst it makes the viewer or reader questions whether they're hearing facts or crazy rumors from ESPN. And if that's the case, why go to ESPN when you can get that level of information from a thousand other different sources.

    But here's where I think ESPN gets it wrong. By all means, they should allow on-air talent to express opinions galore on social media sites. If someone is interesting on Twitter, my thinking goes, then maybe they'll be interesting on ESPN, ESPN.com, ESPN radio, ESPN Deportes, or ESPN the whatever and maybe I'll follow them there.

    ESPN is right not to allow social media to be a substitute for the network, but they still have to use it, not ignore it.


    Posted by at August 10, 2009 12:40 PM

        The trackback entry for this page is : http://www.inthehat.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1730

     

    Trackback Entries

     


    Comments

    #  August 10th, 2009 10:56 PM      kris
    To be fair, I should point out that I posted something here about Michael Jackson once TMZ confirmed, but before major outlets did. It's not that I lack journalistic integrity myself, but rather that when it comes to useless & tawdry celebrity gossip, TMZ is almost never wrong.  
     
    #  August 14th, 2009 1:41 PM      USNFrank
    I was stationed at Fleet Training Group,
    GTMO in 1964. There was a cookbook published entitled "What's Really Cooking In GITMO". The recipes were provided by the listeners of 'Nita Lesney's Gitmo Party Line" radio show. I still have the book! It also contains black & white drawings of many areas around Gitmo such as Fleet Landing, E.M.Club,Teen Agers Club, etc.  
     

     

     


    To leave a comment you must be logged in.
    Log in here
    or Get an Account here.


      page rendered in 0.2636 seconds | ©2004, 2005 Dummocrats.com