Daily Page | Zebrality | 2010 Football Pool | General Chat | Latest Comments

You are on an individual archive page

Click here to return to the main page


Wikipedia does good things. Reward them.

The Daily Links Page
Got a link to submit?
  • Double Rainbow Guy in Windows Live Ad
  • Skeptoid.com on the Myers-Briggs Personality Test
  • New Glarus Brewing invites fans to weigh in on its 2011 beer schedule
  • UW the big loser in Big Ten realignment
       [ 14 comments ]
  • Glee, Flight of the Conchords featured on 9/26 Simpsons premiere
       [ 1 comment ]
  • Zenyatta Stakes reverting to old name meaning Zenyatta will not be able to win the Zenyatta stakes
  • Target to sell Facebook Credits gift cards
  • Officials: Suspect holding hostages at Discovery Channel
       [ 1 comment ]
  • New Big Ten divisions to be announced 7 pm ET tonight
       [ 77 comments ]
  • UEFA enacts vuvuzela ban
  • Blair: Bush world view had 'immense simplicity'
  • Best. Horserace Call. Ever.
       [ 1 comment ]
  • The Media Loses Readers and Viewers to its Own Radicalism
  • Great Debate: Can Rodgers overtake Favre?
       [ 20 comments ]
  • Homeowne's Fight Involves Flag Tied to Tea Party
  • Why Do Heavy Drinkers Outlive Nondrinkers?
       [ 1 comment ]
  • Authorities Were on High Alert for Possible Hijack Attempt
  • Behind the hurricane hype
  • UW-Madison: 17th-best damn university in the whole damn world
  • Social media votes on Aaron Rodgers' beard
       [ 2 comments ]
  • Not so cuddly now: It's claws the psycho squirrel
  • Top 5 Floating Sheep Maps
  • Texas Rep. violated rules, steered scholarships to relatives
  • The smell of freshly-cut grass is actually a plant distress call
  • Why can't Barack Obama tell the world about American tolerance?
  • Anyone Who Wants to Cut Entitlements Clearly Has No Place on a Commission Devoted to Fiscal Responsibility
  • The great Obama-Axelrod-etc. mystery
  • Is the Trade Gap to Blame for Slowing GDP Growth?
  • The six wives of Henry VIII in the movies
       [ 1 comment ]
  • Who's Stupid?
  • Brewers' Gallardo robbed at gunpoint
  • Want to be class president? Not if you're black, in one Miss. school
  • Lance Armstrong Wants To Tell Nation Something But Nation Has To Promise Not To Get Mad
  • Most humble and most arrogant Presidents
       [ 3 comments ]
  • Singles: best soundtrack of the 90's
       [ 1 comment ]
  • Observation Deck: Packers-Colts
  • David Hasselhoff to Compete on ABC's Dancing With the Stars!
  • Solution to the Ground Zero Mosque Dilemma
  • Trapped miners in Chile assuming different roles
  • 'Sportwriters on TV' back on the air ... in Chicago
       [ 2 comments ]
  • Polish man, shot in head, notices five years later
  • Inside the secret world of Trader Joe's
  • Report: Wisconsin & Iowa will be in separate Big Ten divisions
       [ 10 comments ]
  • That buzz you hear? Must be mosquitoes, not interest in Gophers
       [ 2 comments ]
  • Death of a Hero: Brett Favre's Tragic Fall from Grace
  • Rand vs. Ron? Cordoba House Drives Wedge Through The Paul Family
  • Former RNC chairman Ken Mehlman: I'm gay
  • Greeks 'discover Odysseus' palace in Ithaca, proving Homer's hero was real
       [ 3 comments ]
  • Angry Birds eyes a movie/TV deal
  • Coffee shops to customers: get the hell out
       [ 3 comments ]

     

  • Can Oregon destroy the BCS?

       October 22, 2009

    Bitching about the BCS has become a rite of fall, right up there with pumpkin carving, apple picking & Oktoberfest. While there are so many things that are unfair, stupid and just plain wrong about the BCS, for this bitch session, I want to focus on Boise State and Iowa. Now, Boise State and/or Iowa might very well lose a game or two this season. I don't necessarily think that either is the best team in the country. But that's not the point. The point is that these teams, along with countless others, are being cheated out of a chance to prove themselves because they either weren't supposed to be that good or because of how good sportswriters think they are.

    From the beginning of the season, the pundits have told us that the five best teams in the country are Florida, Alabama, Texas, Oklahoma and USC. Coincidentally, four of those teams still occupy the top four spots in the polls. Aren't you amazed at how right the pundits are? I mean, you'd think that their initial perceptions might be wrong, but nope, except for Oklahoma (and really, it's not their fault - they couldn't have known Sam Bradford would get injured), the season has gone down exactly like the pundits expected. Amazing.

    The problem with this fairy tale is that major college football rankings are just self-fulfilling prophecies. If a team is supposed to be good (i.e. USC) then they're forgiven for a loss they weren't supposed to have. If a team isn't supposed to be good, they have to somehow prove to the pundits that they were wrong. Think about that. Teams like Iowa, Boise State, TCU, Cincinnati, etc. don't just have to beat teams on the field, they actually have to somehow make a bunch of self important voters admit that they were wrong. That's at least 3 to 4 times harder than beating Northwestern. Really.

    Sometimes, however, reality delightfully gets in the way of college football's predetermined path to glory. Oklahoma is a good example this year and Oregon might be another. Ah, Oregon. BCS haters should root root root for the Ducks to beat beat Washington this weekend and then defeat USC on Halloween. If that happens - it'll scare the BCS more than Sarah Palin scares liberals. You see, the better Oregon does, the harder it gets for the BCS to denigrate Boise State.

    The college football powers that be would like you to kindly forget that Boise State defeated Oregon the first week of the season. Part of their strategy to help you forget was to bury Oregon in the rankings. Don't believe me? Look at this spreadsheet. Poor Oregon lost on the road to a ranked team and was completely dropped from the rankings. That's unheard of. Hell, Oklahoma is still in the AP poll. Then, Oregon beat a ranked Utah team and still didn't get ranked. They had to crush the then #6 team in the country to get back into the poll. By comparison, Wisconsin got ranked for, uh, beating Wofford and Michigan State and having really cool fans. Were the voters trying to hold Oregon down so as to make Boise State's best win less impressive? Well, it's certainly in the BCS's best interests to do so, isn't it? It'll be awfully hard to jump a one loss team over Boise State if a team like Oregon is sitting at number 5 or 6 and playing in the Rose Bowl. I'm sure that's exactly what would happen in such a scenario, so I'm rooting for maximum outrage. Go Ducks!


    Posted by at October 22, 2009 09:12 AM

        The trackback entry for this page is : http://www.inthehat.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1746

     

    Trackback Entries

     


    Comments

    #  October 22nd, 2009 8:12 PM      themandownthehall
    Great analysis Kris. Well done. As a BCS hater, I say GO DUCKS!!  
     
    #  October 23rd, 2009 9:24 AM      kris
    You know, the very fact that I wrote this actually dooms the following teams to a loss:

    Boise State
    Iowa
    Oregon
    Wisconsin (Wisconsin just as my own personal punishment for whining and because they kind of stink)  
     
    #  October 23rd, 2009 7:02 PM      themandownthehall
    Well, depending on the coach, they may cite this for why they lost! Who knows, I seen coaches blame stranger things than an article!

    Another reason I'm cheering Oregon is that dude who was suspended for that punch. Can't recall the name. He deserved a suspension, yes, but a whole season? That seemed a bit reactionary and harsh to me. They have since allowed him to start after a 6 game suspension and that seems about right. Maybe still a bit high, but about right nevertheless. I would have tossed him for 2-3 games. Maybe 4, but 11? That's too much. So, for coming to their senses, I'll give them a cheer against USC!  
     
    #  October 29th, 2009 3:09 PM      kris
    What will be interesting to look at is how far Oregon drops if they lose to USC. A good example will be to compare that to Ohio State. Ohio State is still in the top 25 with a loss to USC at home and a loss to an unranked Purdue. How would a two-loss Oregon compare when their two losses would be against teams in top 5?  
     

     

     


    To leave a comment you must be logged in.
    Log in here
    or Get an Account here.


      page rendered in 0.2525 seconds | ©2004, 2005 Dummocrats.com