Daily Page | Zebrality | 2010 Football Pool | General Chat | Latest Comments

You are on an individual archive page

Click here to return to the main page


Wikipedia does good things. Reward them.

The Daily Links Page
Got a link to submit?
  • Double Rainbow Guy in Windows Live Ad
  • Skeptoid.com on the Myers-Briggs Personality Test
  • New Glarus Brewing invites fans to weigh in on its 2011 beer schedule
  • UW the big loser in Big Ten realignment
       [ 14 comments ]
  • Glee, Flight of the Conchords featured on 9/26 Simpsons premiere
       [ 1 comment ]
  • Zenyatta Stakes reverting to old name meaning Zenyatta will not be able to win the Zenyatta stakes
  • Target to sell Facebook Credits gift cards
  • Officials: Suspect holding hostages at Discovery Channel
       [ 1 comment ]
  • New Big Ten divisions to be announced 7 pm ET tonight
       [ 77 comments ]
  • UEFA enacts vuvuzela ban
  • Blair: Bush world view had 'immense simplicity'
  • Best. Horserace Call. Ever.
       [ 1 comment ]
  • The Media Loses Readers and Viewers to its Own Radicalism
  • Great Debate: Can Rodgers overtake Favre?
       [ 20 comments ]
  • Homeowne's Fight Involves Flag Tied to Tea Party
  • Why Do Heavy Drinkers Outlive Nondrinkers?
       [ 1 comment ]
  • Authorities Were on High Alert for Possible Hijack Attempt
  • Behind the hurricane hype
  • UW-Madison: 17th-best damn university in the whole damn world
  • Social media votes on Aaron Rodgers' beard
       [ 2 comments ]
  • Not so cuddly now: It's claws the psycho squirrel
  • Top 5 Floating Sheep Maps
  • Texas Rep. violated rules, steered scholarships to relatives
  • The smell of freshly-cut grass is actually a plant distress call
  • Why can't Barack Obama tell the world about American tolerance?
  • Anyone Who Wants to Cut Entitlements Clearly Has No Place on a Commission Devoted to Fiscal Responsibility
  • The great Obama-Axelrod-etc. mystery
  • Is the Trade Gap to Blame for Slowing GDP Growth?
  • The six wives of Henry VIII in the movies
       [ 1 comment ]
  • Who's Stupid?
  • Brewers' Gallardo robbed at gunpoint
  • Want to be class president? Not if you're black, in one Miss. school
  • Lance Armstrong Wants To Tell Nation Something But Nation Has To Promise Not To Get Mad
  • Most humble and most arrogant Presidents
       [ 3 comments ]
  • Singles: best soundtrack of the 90's
       [ 1 comment ]
  • Observation Deck: Packers-Colts
  • David Hasselhoff to Compete on ABC's Dancing With the Stars!
  • Solution to the Ground Zero Mosque Dilemma
  • Trapped miners in Chile assuming different roles
  • 'Sportwriters on TV' back on the air ... in Chicago
       [ 2 comments ]
  • Polish man, shot in head, notices five years later
  • Inside the secret world of Trader Joe's
  • Report: Wisconsin & Iowa will be in separate Big Ten divisions
       [ 10 comments ]
  • That buzz you hear? Must be mosquitoes, not interest in Gophers
       [ 2 comments ]
  • Death of a Hero: Brett Favre's Tragic Fall from Grace
  • Rand vs. Ron? Cordoba House Drives Wedge Through The Paul Family
  • Former RNC chairman Ken Mehlman: I'm gay
  • Greeks 'discover Odysseus' palace in Ithaca, proving Homer's hero was real
       [ 3 comments ]
  • Angry Birds eyes a movie/TV deal
  • Coffee shops to customers: get the hell out
       [ 3 comments ]

     

  • Options in health care

       November 16, 2009

    While I appreciate the GOP's opposition to Obama Care, I do wish there was more specific talk about what health care reform should look like. Looking for alternatives, I found this review of McCain's health care plan. Basically, McCain's plan was to put health care choices in the hands of the consumer through tax rebates, elimination of employer-provided insurance and interstate insurance markets.

    What's ironic about the McCain plan is that the very plans the reviewer predicts that many Americans would flock to (high deductibles combined with health savings accounts) are the plans that wouldn't be available under Obama Care. Of course, what's also ironic about the McCain plan is that it assumes employers would give their employees the equivalent of their insurance as a salary increase. Fat chance with this kind of unemployment, but still, at least this kind of plan lets people pay for what they want and doesn't put all the decisions about what's covered, etc. in the government's hands and subject to various political winds and follies.

    Critics also bemoaned the fate of the old and those in poor health under McCain's plan, but wouldn't certain insurers start to specialize in offering care to these folks the way car insurers provide coverage to bad drivers? Sure, it'd be more expensive for them, but it is more expensive. Maybe health savings accounts could be treated more like health IRAs that people could save for a lifetime of health care or you could specifically buy some kind of catastrophic care insurance or infertility coverage or whatever.

    Or perhaps you have a choice of accepting the cash tax rebate for health care and shopping for the insurance you want, or not getting the rebate, accepting a higher tax rate and entering the public option.

    The point is we really don't know what won't work, but I'm pretty sure that an incredibly bloated government program isn't our only option.


    Posted by at November 16, 2009 10:12 AM

        The trackback entry for this page is : http://www.inthehat.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1755

     

    Trackback Entries

     


    Comments

    There are no comments for this story.

     

    yet.

     

     


    To leave a comment you must be logged in.
    Log in here
    or Get an Account here.


      page rendered in 0.2564 seconds | ©2004, 2005 Dummocrats.com