You are on an individual archive page

Click here to return to the main page


Wikipedia does good things. Reward them.

The Daily Links Page
Got a link to submit?
  • Colbert Leads Huntsman in S.C.
  • Polish prosecutor 'shoots self after news conference'
  • Jim Rome leaving ESPN. Bonus: Footage of Jim Rome getting attacked by Jim Everett & crying like a baby
  • Broncos, Tim Tebow stun Steelers in OT, win 29-23 in NFL playoffs
       [ 2 comments ]
  • Video: Remember 2008
       [ 1 comment ]
  • Beezow Doo-Doo Zopittybop-Bop-Bop faces weapon and drug charges
  • Video: Green Bay anchorman loves lamp
  • Video: Rodgers & Raji in the new Discount Double Check ad
  • Jim Rome: out of The Jungle and onto the (horse) farm
  • New IL Law Requires Photo ID To Buy Drain Cleaner
  • Fawn Cuddles Kitten, Hearts Explode
  • The priest who changed the course of history for the worse... by rescuing four-year-old Hitler from drowning in icy river
  • Get Fit or Get Fined: Web Service Offers to Charge You for Skipping the Gym
  • Fine proposed for botching US national anthem
  • Why Best Buy is Going out of Business...Gradually
       [ 1 comment ]
  • Edina boutique takes heat for trashing $4,000-plus gowns
  • Law Student Goes 'Homeless by Choice' Touts Value of Gym Club Membership
  • VIDEO: Snoop Dogg on 'The Price Is Right'
  • Flynn and Out
       [ 3 comments ]
  • Don't put Bielema on the firing line
       [ 1 comment ]
  • Your end of the season Vikings comment thread
       [ 2 comments ]
  • Mass. budget motel fights forfeiture by feds
  • Vikings scrutinize downtown Mpls. stadium site near basilica
       [ 2 comments ]
  • Kelly Clarkson criticized on Twitter after singer endorses Ron Paul for President 
  • Political Predictions for 2012
  • We're All Doing The Best We Can
  • Video Of Little Girl Getting Pissed Off About Pink Toys Will Make Your Heart Swell
  • The 10 best sports-related Hitler Reactions of 2011
  • Happy Endings on the housing crisis
  • Why You Just Got New York Times Spam
  • There Will Be No Friday This Week In Samoa
  • The Most Hipster State In The US
  • Online Merchants Home in on Imbibing Consumers
       [ 1 comment ]
  • On islamic fashion
       [ 1 comment ]
  • Sears as Lampert's 'Mismanaged Asset' Loses Customers to Macy's
       [ 1 comment ]
  • 5 social network predictions for 2012
  • Cheetah, chimp star of classic Tarzan movies, dies at 80
  • The Hottest Things on TV in 2011
  • Beer in cans: It's not just for Bud anymore
  • Seven Packers earn Pro Bowl selections
  • The Worst Angry Christmas Tweets In the World
       [ 2 comments ]
  • Minnesota cities try to hold back on rented housing
  • Why Iowa Shouldn't Vote First Anymore
  • Some Falcons Players Upset Drew Brees Went For The Record Last Night
  • We've Identified Jilted Packergirl
  • With its 'W' initiative, ESPN tries to solve the equation of serving women sports fans
       [ 2 comments ]
  • Owner surprised to find cat regularly catches bus
  • Charles Barkley: Skip Bayless Has Surpassed Peter Vecsey As The Biggest Jackass In The History Of Journalism
  • Handicapping the 2011 NFL MVP Race, 2.0
  • Vikings are the anti-Packers
       [ 2 comments ]

     

  • Gimme just one reason

       June 10, 2010

    Sometimes when I'm searching for inspiration I like to go to Soul Pancake. Usually, I'll find a thought or question that'll provoke a response that'll end up being the spark for something.

    Today it's this question: Does there have to be a reason for everything?

    Is it necessary for everything within a belief system to fundamentally trace back to a creator or a genesis or even a big bang, a huge raison d'etre for everything? Or can we handle the idea that some things might exist independently of an owner and a cause?

    I was thinking about this in tandem with this story about a woman who was killed by lightning just minutes before her boyfriend was going to propose to her on a beloved mountaintop.

    When something like that, or really nearly any other tragedy, happens, the overwhelming urge is to try to console the person with the thought that there's a reason behind it. That there's a greater good working behind the scenes of the terrible tragedy.

    I don't know about that. I mean, I really want to believe in fate and that things happen for a reason and there's a pattern, or at least karma, in the world, but all evidence points to the contrary.

    But there's comfort in those concepts, which must by why we keep coming back to them and why our belief systems are built around them. But really, shouldn't there be equal comfort in abandoning those ideas? How free would you feel if you weren't worried about karma biting you in the ass? If we were less concerned with fate would we live more in the moment? Heck, if we just stop analyzing everything for its fit in the patterns we created wouldn't that be liberating?

    Of course, it's probably all easier said than done. If you see an old friend it's more fun to think that there's a higher power directing your encounter than to realize that the only direction involved are the ones you both took to that particular destination. That's boring. Meaning is food for thought.

    Or maybe fate & karma are more like cliches? We use those concepts to tell a story and tie it up with a neat bow. Maybe without that it'd free us creatively to come up the conclusions we want, patterns be damned?


    Posted by kris at June 10, 2010 02:29 PM

        The trackback entry for this page is : http://www.inthehat.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1873

     

    Trackback Entries

     


    Comments

    There are no comments for this story.

     

    yet.

     

     


      page rendered in 0.311 seconds | ©2004, 2005 Dummocrats.com