Sen. Warren Lauds Pres. Biden’s Pushing for Higher Taxes on Super Rich

Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren lauds Pres. Biden for renewing the push for taxes on rich people worth $100 million or more to pay 20% as income tax. The Democratic Senator referred to the Biden administration’s latest proposal to introduce a new tax system that would change the way highly paid corporate executives to pay higher taxes.

Actually top Democratic lawmakers including Sen. Warren have introduced similar proposals before but have not received support before, in being recognized as an agenda; particularly when Kentucky Republican Senator Mitch McConnell was Senate Majority Leader. According to the Senator Warren, what they have been proposing all along is to raise taxes imposed on the country’s millionaires and billionaires, as they are not paying taxes based on the same rates imposed on everyone else.

Pres. Biden’s Renewed Call Supports Previous Democratic Tax Reform Proposals

 

When Senator Warren campaigned for nomination as the Democratic Party’s 2020 presidential candidate, she proposed an annual tax of two percent (2%) on millionnaires and billionnaires with net worth of at least $50 million and $1 billion, respectively; plus an additional annual four percent (4%) surtax on households with bet worth of over $1 billion.

Moreover, in line with President Biden’s renewed focus on wealthy company executives, the Masschusetts Senator reiterated her criticisms on how major corporations reward their CEOs and investors with stocks that came with buyback options. The compensation method comes with buyback option, which means a CEO or investor has the option to sell for a higher value and pay a lower Capital Gains Tax rate instead of paying higher tax based on the Income Tax Table.

President Biden’s proposal is for a legislation that will require corporate executives to hold ownership of company shares for a specific number of years before selling them as equity shares.

Different Types of Government

Things start to become complex from the time when political structures, philosophical ideologies and economic policies have been developed. If you are confused or need help to further understand how the government works, don’t worry, we got you! In the next paragraphs, you are going to find the most common forms of government followed by several nations today.

Democracy

This is a type of government that lets people pick their leaders. The main goal of democracy is to practice governance via fair representation and to prevent the abuse of power. The outcome, it creates a system that demands debate, compromise and discourse to be able to satisfy the widest possible public interests.

Democracy is advocating fair and free elections, human rights protection, law and order and civic participation. This is the same reason why many businesses, hotels, restaurants and so forth prefer a democratic form of government than something else as they get a voice as well in the community.

Communism

With communism, it is a centralized form of government that is led by one party that is typically authoritarian. This is inspired by a German philosopher, Karl Marx. Nations that follow communism replace profit-based economy and private properties with public ownership as well as communal control of the economic production similar to:

  • Natural resources
  • Capital goods and;
  • Labor

With communism, it makes citizens part of a classless society that is distributing services and goods as needed.

Socialism

This is a system that is promoting cooperation instead of competition among its citizens.

The citizens then own a mean of production as well as distribution of services and goods while there is a centralized government that oversee the process. Every person is benefiting and contributing to the system as per their abilities and needs.

Oligarchy

Say for example that the government is following oligarchy leadership, they normally follow a specific set of qualities similar to heredity, race or even wealth. These are then used in giving power to a small group of people. In most cases, oligarchies have authoritative rulers and the absence of individual rights or democratic practices.

The Battle for Power in Government and Business

Politics and power within an organization or business just as those hotel bei Schloss Neuschwanstein are somewhat comparable to the traditional government’s political structure. In which we know that the authority is distributed across the different areas of the system in which that power is executed.

Politics in the Government and in the Business

Oftentimes, there are other sources of power that is competing for control, which is not actually a bad thing. Unless someone decided to take it the dirty way. The organization’s internal politics on the other hand could be polarized as well since everyone can relate to one side of the story over the other. Sadly, this is regardless of how neutral they try to react. In a nutshell, organizational politics and power in the business can also be a fascinating thing and at the same time, unique, which can bring a huge impact on organizational behavior.

The Thirst for Power

Struggles for power are pretty common in society, not just in the government and business. One individual is shooting something from someone and yet, that person is not willing to give in. As a result, that person might exert their own authority and power to persuade the other party to concede instead.

It is actually a tactic that could work on any given occasion. However, it might make the situation become more of a toxic and combative environment than peaceful and democratic when it fails. In most cases, this happens between employees, coworkers as well as their supervisor and even on management, other departments as well as in boardrooms.

Control of Power

Being able to stay out of the thirst for power is truly a skill that gives you a lot in the business, so long as it is used in protecting yourself. Being able to survive the power struggle is usually the end goal no matter what industry your business is operating.

Still, there is the aftermath that needs to be dealt with when everything settles down and its impact could hit anyone who is too close to it. According to experts, they say that if you like to be involved in a power challenge, then it is imperative to not acknowledge the position of the person in the given argument, rather their feelings.

Why Businessman Must Not Mix Politics with Business

If you are a businessman, I would like to help you to stop the inevitable fate of the majority of small to medium businesses such as big truck towing san jose. We will now take a look at the top major reasons why you must not associate your business with politics. All of these reasons are interconnected and must occur in sequence.

1. Your business may lose loyal clients

The first thing that might happen if you openly flex your political party’s flag all over your store is a drastic loss of customers. The logic can be shown with basic mathematics using the official election as an example. For plainness, let’s think that half of your clients were Democrats that are fans of Joe Biden and the other half were Republicans that prefer Donald Trump. If you were to support either party’s campaign stuff in your store doors or windows, then there is a high chance that half of your customers that promote the opposing party might get insulted and never return.

2. Your business may eventually die

The next major reason why entrepreneurs must not combine their businesses with politics is that it could fall. This reason is normally the last result of the first two points above. If companies lose a lot of customers, then they will lose interest. If they lose a large amount of interest, then they might have to stop the shop from operating.

3. Your money may go to waste

The last major reason is that your money may suffer. When a business stops, the owner have to depend on some source of income to pay her money. If they do not have any other forms of income, then she will apparently have to get another job right away. Until that income is returned, she will have to use her present wealth to stay alive.

In conclusion, the three primary reasons why you must never think of linking politics with your business are: you will only have few customers; your business could compromise its income, and your money might go to waste.

Personal Life of Public Officials

A lot of factors in our lives are not made available to public. However, if one enters into a public life, like deciding to rule and govern a country, a state, or even just a small place, the private life and each factor of it will be made publicly available. It is not as easy as hiring the best painters colorado to cover what should be covered. Your life will be an open book to public and this is already given when entering politics.

First factor can be the public official’s or politician’s health. A public servant whether he like it or not must be transparent when it comes to his or her well-being. It is because people will always love to see their leader in good shape. This will also give the public the assurance that the leader will be able to serve the people all the time and perform his duties in a great manner.

Another factor is the finances. It is essential, ever since, for a public official to be open about his assets and everything. This is to show the public that there is no corruption happening under their leader’s administration. This is one of the biggest issue in the world of politics. Leaders of a state are like treasurers as well. The money or funds allocated for a particular project and those that should be given away to people must go to the said path.

Lastly, even if it is really too personal, a leader’s family life will also be shown to the public. That is why a leader’s principle, dignity, and integrity not just in serving the people will be monitored by the people who trust them. His or her family life matters to many because how a leader handles a family will always be a reflection of how he govern the people.

 

From Trump To Biden Presidency, Have Things Already Changed For The Better In The United States?

Many Americans considered the last US presidential elections to be a historic one for their country. For one obvious reason, the elections held last year was the only one in modern history to take place in the middle of a global crisis: the COVID-19 pandemic. Prior to the commencement of the campaign period for the candidates in 2020 elections, former US president Donald Trump attempted to postpone the polls as the coronavirus pandemic rages on across the United States. Sure, this appeared to be an acceptable reason to postpone the election, but the American people voiced out their willingness to push through with it, claiming that the nation needs to elect a new leader to fix everything that has been destroyed in the last four years of the Trump presidency.

Then, it came the election day, and after the long hours of waiting, the current president of the United States, Joe Biden, was officially proclaimed as the winner. The people has high hopes that President Biden will be everything that former President Trump was not. This includes the number of measures that Trump made as president towards immigrants, as well as addressing the growing number of joblessness and criminality in the country.

American Flag

Three Months Into Biden Administration, Changes Are Not Felt, Maybe Yet

The importance of the election day was stressed out last year by the American people, as they were simply not impressed by how their former leaders were solving the crises plaguing the country. Now, with Joe Biden as the new president, we will see if the Americans clamoring for positive change will happen, as what they have hoped for in the last year’s elections.

It is not really fair to be giving our a grade to the performance of the Biden administration, when the current POTUS has only been sitting in office for three months.

Nonetheless, we can see his real agendas with the very first actions that he has done as the most powerful person in the United States. The first remarkable thing that he did was to deploy public health experts and medical professionals in the COVID-19 task force, which is great because this would make sure that the country is going towards the right path in fighting the pandemic.

Although, some people have noticed that President Biden has yet to fulfill his promises during the last campaign period, which are mostly about undoing the damaging measures that former President Trump had implemented. For starters, the inhumane treatment of the illegal immigrants in detention camps in www.cocafish.com is said to be continuing as of this moment, particularly the caging of little migrant kids who were separated from their parents at such a young and helpless age.

Healthy Ways to Use Politics in the Office

What do you assume of when someone say the words “office politics“? Is it all about “talking about people behind their backs,” giving negative or untrue rumors, and “sucking up” to the correct people? If so, you’ll probably prefer to stay as far away from it as you can!

But, like it or not it, office politics are a matter of life in any business. And it is probable to enhance yourself and your cause without jeopardizing your values or those of your company, regardless of its nature like construction factoring rates.

Making “good” politics lets you to promote your team’s concerns sincerely and properly. And, being aware of the “bad” politics around you allows you to bypass needless struggles while others take benefit from them.

In this article, we will see why workplace politics are still rampant, and look at seven ways to “win” at office politics without sinking to the lowest standards of behavior.

1. Examine the Organization Chart

Office politics often surround the regular organizational construction. So, sit back and witness for a while, and then outline the executive power and authority in your business, aside from people’s rank or job title.

To achieve this, ask yourself questions like, “Who are the real influencers?,” “Who has power but does not to apply it?,” “Who is respected?,” “Who champions or guides others?,” and “Who is the brains at the back the business?”

2. Read the Informal Network

Once you know where the strength and authority lie, it’s time to check people’s communications and connections to know the natural or social networks.

Listen closely (but discreetly and politely) to obtain out who gets along with who, and who sees it more hard to interact with others.

3. Establish Connections

Now that you know how current relationships work, you can begin to create your personal social network.

Look above your instant team, and intersect the social hierarchy in all directions – co-workers, managers and administrators. Don’t be worried of politically influential people. Rather, get to know them, and build high-quality connections that bypass hollow praise.

This is How Rich Politicians Take Advantage of Politics and Government

Income inequality has captured America’s economic debate.

Indeed, the huge gap between the rich and everyone else has kindled pressure throughout the world, from Europe’s continuing Brexit crisis to this year’s elections. An excellent rebate in particular difficulty globally has not diminished the sense of loss among middle- and engaged-class residents of countries with great economies.

Here are five reasons identified by scholars of the subject:

Technology has developed the kind of work

The digital epoch produces enormous wealth for those with the abilities and training to take advantage, but it diminishes what statisticians call “middle-skill” tasks. Computer software and automated machines now fill roles — from administrative tasks to conventional construction— that once given middle-class wages for workers without even finishing college degrees.

Globalization

Competition from rising economies like China’s, combined with reduced trade barriers, have further reduced prospects for American workers without advanced skills. That has produced disastrous impacts for workers in sectors such as textiles, furniture and leather goods.

The rise of superstars

Finding firms such as Apple and Amazon can draw income across the world on a scale far larger than in previous generations. That generates great jackpots for those businesses and the executives who lead them, transforming the pay gap among high executives and the workers they employ into a chasm.

The dissolution of established labor

The percentage of workers embodied by worker unions has fallen by half, to just over 10%, over the last 40 years. That has narrowed their authority to negotiate for greater wages and advantages. That said, expect that they live in luxury – huge house, high-quality mattress Australia, to name a few.

Switching, and violating, the rules

Increasing capital gives political power, and it has supported business winners to extra reward themselves through government policies. The 2017 GOP tax cut provides an unbalanced share of its advantages to the most wealthy citizens of America.

Similar thing goes for policies at private organizations. Admissions systems at high end universties support the kids of donors and past graduates. As the latest scandal ensnaring famous entertainers and athletic coaches demonstrate, those who are wealthy can also buy illicit advantages.

What is There to Like About Biden? or Trump?

Biden builds his campaign by hosting small and socially distanced campaign events, whilst sending populist economic messages in courting all types of voters. Trump’s campaign on the other hand, are built on waging personal attacks and making fun of Biden to amuse his supporters; claiming without any evidence that his Democratic rival would delay the vaccine and “prolong the pandemic.”

Yet even as different polls tell us that Biden is leading, the memories of the 2016 elections still hang in the political air. That is why Democrats cannot rest until after the outcome of the November election; or should they, if ever Trump gets re-elected?

Even if Trump does not have any policies or plans to discuss, nor has taken solid actions in addressing the pandemic other than make promises about a forthcoming vaccine, many of his supporters still come out in droves. While Trump is still making promises about healthcare plans and at the same time dismantling the existing Affordable Care Act that the less privileged found beneficial, we still cannot say for sure that Trump will not be re-elected.

Apparently, the outcome of the November 2020 election will define us as a nation. Either as a group of people with strong political will to change things for the good of all; or as a country where falsehoods, racism, social inequality, despotism and lack of concern for the environment is the prevailing political mandate.

What is there to like about Joe Biden that he will be able to unify a divided country to work together? What is there to like about Trump that will change my mind in voting for Biden? There’s a quick answer to the latter question: Nothing.

Citing Examples of What to Like About Biden

Although Biden appeared to be just a bungling old politician prone to committing gaffes and forgetting things during the race for nomination as presidential Democratic candidate, he still won over younger and seemingly wiser contenders. Even if Biden was not my personal choice, one thing I came to like about Joe Biden is that he was able to transform into a competent and formidable opponent in facing Trump.

Apparently, Biden possesses one of the important qualities that make a great leader. That of listening to reason and of heeding reasonable advice, which Trump obviously lacks.

Another thing I came to like about Biden is seeing him lay the ground for unification, starting with his rivals in the contest for Democratic nomination. He has been working with his closest rivals, Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren and Pete Buttigieg in formulating policies that he will present to the nation.

This Democratic presidential candidate carefully mulled over his choice of Vice Presidential candidate in choosing Senator Kamala Harris; despite the latter’s aggressive stance toward him in one of the Democratic debates. He checkmarked Sen. Harris’ qualities as a potential partner who will help him carry out plans for the good of the American people, and not for his personal enrichment.

During the disastrous debate between him and Trump, Biden showed temperament and ability to present himself as an unwavering target of a political bully. Qualities that will make him appear respectable when convening with other world leaders, instead of being the center of jokes like Trump was. Yes, aside from the policies Joe Biden presented, there are a lot of examples of things to like about him.

Sheltering-in-Place : Life Over Livelihood

Governors in 5 U.S. States have ordered the millions of people in their jurisdiction to shelter-in-place; choosing life over livelihood on their behalf.

The first to implement the drastic measure in waging the war against the Covid-19 infectious disease was the San Francisco Bay Area, as the number of community-transmitted cases quickly rose to about 350. Apparently alarmed by the projection that as many as 25 million individuals could be hit with the Covid-19 disease In California, Governor Gavin Newsom eventually gave the order to make shelter-in-place restriction mandatory in the entire state.

In less than a day thereafter, Governor Andrew Cuomo of New York, Governor Jay Robert “J. B.” Pritzker of Illinois, Governor Philip Murphy of New Jersey, and Edward “Ned” Lamont Jr, gave the same order in separate announcements. All five governors agree that at the end of the day, the health and well-being of their respective constituents can be best protected, if people are forced by law to stay home. The only time they will be allowed to go out is if they need to buy food or medicine, but will be subject to vetting by local law enforcers.

The World Health Organization (WHO) reported Saturday (March 21, 2020) that the confirmed cases of Covid-19 infection across 168 countries around the globe has reached 234,000, to which 9,840 resulted in fatalities. As of this writing the numbers have once again risen to 284,566 confirmed cases with at least 11,868 deaths.

Shelter-in-Place Restrictions can Slow Down the Rapid Rise

The U.S. is fast becoming one of the worst-hit countries, as the numbers have quickly climbed to 19,624 confirmed cases and 260 deaths. Mainly because many ignored warnings coming from the WHO, the CDC and later from the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) that the contagion has reached a stage where it can be transmitted by way of close person-to-person encounters and interactions, whether in public or private places.

As many of the American population took light of advisories about distancing from each other by at least 3 meters apart , the numbers of confirmed cases rose rapidly. Not a few of the people with whom the infected had socialized and/or came in close contact with, also tested positive with the novel coronavirus. Cases of infection rose exponentially because for every person that gets infected, it is quite likely that he or she had transmitted the disease to several others in recent physical social interactions.

Death tolls also increase, presumably because health care facilities are swamped, while patients needing medical attention far outnumber the medical staff and crew.

The NIAID Warned Things Will Get Worse if People Will Not Strictly Adhere to Social Distancing Measures

In seeing how the American public still went about their ordinary lives without observing social distancing measures, the head of NIAID, Dr. Anthony Fauci, kept imploring all Americans to limit having contact with others in order to slow the rapid rate with which new cases of Covid-19 infections transpire.

Dr. Fauci warned that

“The worst is yet to happen as the Covid-19 crisis could very well continue into the summer.” “It is how people respond to that challenge, will determine what the ultimate endpoint will be.”

Based on a report released by researchers at the Imperial College London, a computer modeling used in analyzing the current state of the Covid-19 crisis in the U.S., predicted that an estimated 2 million Americans could die if strict social distancing measures will not be enacted.

Why Hunting Must be Legal?

Hunting must be prohibited. First executing a creature, for instance a deer, isn’t about slaughtering a human. People have far a larger number of feelings than wild creatures and we are more brilliant than the normal bear. Not one creature is more astute than us. Likewise, creatures simply follow their nature. In contrast to people, they don’t have a clue about any superior to discovering nourishment, recreating, and running from predators. Blamelessness is only a word made to incite feelings of delicacy and “they don’t have the foggiest idea about any better.”

Hunting is legitimate, and ought to stay that way. Numerous contentions on the no side say we reserve no privilege to take a creatures life. I oppose this idea. One of the significant contentions individuals have against chasing is that we reserve no option to mediate with nature. Since we are a piece of this planet, we are a piece of the biological system we live in. You might want to click here if you want to know more. We are predators and predators chase different creatures. The Mountain Lion chases the deer. Is the Mountain Lion underhanded on the grounds that it is attempting to endure? No. The Mountain Lion is simply satisfying its obligation as predator by getting the number of inhabitants in deer far from the environments conveying limit (The populace at which a biological system can bolster no more). We should do the equivalent since we have been given the job of the predator. In different contentions individuals state it is unscrupulous to chase, and trackers simply prefer to murder creatures and take lives. On the off chance that this were valid, at that point trackers would go to a nearby steers ranch, approach a dairy animals, and blow its head off (Please pardon the realistic depiction). The truth of the matter is the satisfaction in the chase doesn’t originate from the execute, it originates from the test of following the deer, staying inconspicuous, and utilizing each outside aptitude required for a fruitful chase. A well known explanation against chasing is the creatures perspective. Consider it if our circumstances were switched. The creature that you chase, given the opportunity, would kill you without the slightest hesitation to endure and live.

The Fairness to Contact Lens Consumers Act

Contact lenses are more popular and versatile nowadays, which is why a lot of people purchase kontaktlinser på nett since it is a more convenient way of obtaining contact lenses. However, although it is easier and more convenient to purchase contact lenses via the internet, it is still best to be cautious especially when obtaining contact lenses from other people aside from an eye care professional. Hence, the FDA and FTC regulates the sales of contact lenses since they want you to be a careful and be a smart consumer.

The Fairness to Contact Lens Consumers Act

The Fairness to Contact Lens Consumers Act raises the capability of consumers to shop here and there when purchasing contact lenses. The said Act gives certain rights to consumers, enforces obligations on both prescribers and vendors of contact lenses, as well as requires the FTC to create and impose implementing guidelines and rules. In July 2004, the FTC issued the Contact Lens Rule to explain and make clear the requirements of the Act. The said Act was presented as H.R. 3140 in the House of Representatives of the 108th Congress.

The Contact Lens Rule necessitates that prescribers of contact lenses, anyone authorized by the state law to issue contact lenses prescriptions including optometrists, ophthalmologists as well as licensed opticians (dispensing opticians) who are allowed to fit contact lenses, to provide patients, even though they don’t request for it, a duplicate of their prescriptions of contact lens after they have fitted them. Hence, when a patient would want to purchase contact lenses from others, they may provide sellers of their prescription. It is also the obligation of the seller to ask for and verify the prescription of the consumer prior to selling them contact lenses.

How does the process of verification work? The consumer gives to the seller the information of the prescription. For request for verification, the seller then forwards the information it to the prescriber who has eight-business-hours to reply. If there is no respond from the prescriber in that given time, the prescription is automatically verified. The seller then may provide the consumer contact lenses.

Whistleblower’s Complaint vs Trump : Current Speculations Point to Trump’s Bullying of Ukrainian President

Last week, the news media stream was full of reports about an alleged intelligence officer blowing the whistle on U.S. president Trump. The complaint contained allegations about Trump’s disturbing conduct in connection with several phone conversations held with a foreign leader.

The Washington Post was the first to carry the whistle-blowing incident, but which to date, still has vague details. As it turned out, the National Intelligence Director to whom the complaint was submitted chose to bring the matter to Trump, instead of bringing it to Congress as required by legal whistle-blowing procedures.

Speculations about the Details of the Whistleblower’s Complaint

The different major news outlets have pieced together bits and pieces of information on events that led to the whistle-blowing complaint filed by the intelligence officer.

On all points of view, the alleged misconduct is in connection with Trump’s widely publicized action of pressuring the newly-elected president of Ukraine to gather evidence aimed at smearing Joe Biden. That is because former vice-president Biden has been leading polls that suggest he will be the Democratic candidate most likely to face Trump in the 2020 presidential elections.

Who is the whistleblower?

Some are looking to either former Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats, who resigned last July 2019, or to Susan Gordon, the former Principal Deputy Director of National Intelligence, who also resigned a month after.

According to The Times, Coats resigned not only because the Trump administration continued to water down his warnings about Russian activities that pose threats to U.S. national security. The former intelligence director’s greater grievance is that the White House altered certain sections in Coats’ dossier about Russia’s interference in the 2018 midterm elections. The purpose of which was to make certain information stated therein, appear less critical.

Susan Gordon, on the other hand, submitted her handwritten resignation to Trump, on August 2019, which read

“I offer this letter as an act of respect and patriotism, not preference. You should have your team,”

Thereafter, Trump replaced the two intelligence officers with known Trump loyalists, including the new intelligence director who did not submit the whistleblower’s complaint to Congress.

What “Promise” Could be Disturbing Enough to Move an Intelligence Officer to Blow the Whistle?

In continuing with the speculations, the question of to whom Trump’s “promise” was made remains a mystery. Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky, a former comedian before he was elected president by majority of the Ukrainians, seems a likely candidate. He is known to have tread cautiously to avoid provoking Trump, lest the latter makes good on his threat to suspend the $250 million military aid that Congress appropriated for Ukraine. The financial aid is meant to help the country ward off Russia’s military might.

Zelensky’s first show of cooperation was when it halted any participation or involvement in Special Counsel Mueller’s investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential elections. This denotes that even before Congress approved the $250 million military aid, the Ukrainian president was already in direct communication with the White House

In August, 2019 it was reported that Trump was delaying the release of the Ukraine military aid. After questions about the slow delivery were raised by both Congressional Republicans and Democrats, Trump finally approved the release in mid-September, a week before the news of the intelligence whistleblower’s complaint blew up.

However, the latest Washington Post update said that according to the whistleblower, there was no mention of military aid during the conversation.

Frankly, unless Congress sheds light to this by way of a hearing, no one knows the exact reasons that moved an intelligence officer to finally blow the whistle on Trump.

Trump’s Frequent Racist-Tweets are Endangering the Minority Population in the U.S.

Donald Trump, despite being the holder of the highest office in the U.S. has become more aggressive and dangerous in expressing his dislike for the non-white minority population of the country. As days and political activities advance toward the 2020 presidential elections; or toward Trump’s possible impeachment before the presidential elections, he has been unleashing double-edged racist slurs one after another.

Although many perceive it as Trump’s way of rousing support from his white-supremacist supporters, minority groups are also concerned that his racist attacks are endangering their safety as citizens of the U.S. Attacks that even lawmakers are not spared, since 4 women Democratic House Representatives and Democratic House Committee Chairman Representative Elijah Cummings, all of color, were not spared.

If no less than the president of the U.S. is tweeting and mouthing hate remarks directed at respected and prominent elected officials, then his supporters will likely feel justified to follow their leader.

Trump denies being a racist, which drew affirmation from websites frequented by his white supremacist supportes, including the openly neo-Nazis. He also elicited chants of “send her back” during his speech in his rally in Greenville, North Carolina, in support of his verbal attacks against Congresswoman Ilhan Omar, one of the House Representatives making up The Squad. In fact, after his attention-calling racist tweets in July, Trump enjoyed an increased approval rating coming from Republican voters.

Will Increased Approval Rating also Mean More White Supremacist Violence?

Ordinary non-white citizens feel they are no longer safe, as some are already looking into installing CCTV cameras in their homes as added protection. They are well aware of the importance of elections, and what some candidates are capable of doing just to get the vote they need to get elected or at worst, be re-elected in their current government positions.

There is no telling what deplorable acts of terrorism white supremacist fanatics will do, in order to prevent members of the minority groups from casting votes that could unseat Trump. They have been emboldened by Trump’s statement of “I don’t know if I can stop them (Trump supporters).” After all, the statement suggests that when it comes to imposing anti-racist laws, Trump becomes less aggressive.

Remember the Charlottesville incident in 2017? It involved a neo-Nazi rallyist who drove his car right into the group of counterprotesters voicing disapproval over white supremacists taking to the streets to promote Nazi ideology. The incident resulted to the deaths of a counterprotester named Heather Heyer and two police officers, and the life imprisonment of the neo-Nazi attacker, James Alex Fields, Jr.

The sad part about this incident is that Donald Trump still called the white supremacist rallyists as a bunch of “fine people”.

Installing surveillance cameras not only in homes but all over a community is one good way of monitoring people who may have intentions of doing harm. It is not uncommon for acts of aggression to happen especially when an election period draws near. In Texas and Chicago, surveillance cameras are installed in polling places to ensure, not only the integrity of the voting process that transpires, but also to heighten the security.

As a note, those interested to heed the advice of security service providers will find bargain deals for surveillance cameras at the Amazon Great Indian Sale on Electronics.

Legality Behind Astronomy

The physical law becomes the formal training of future scientists in the field of astronomy. In the coming years, astronomers must have to anticipate the kind of law that determines the way of human beings in dealing with each other. However, there are few who consider that the best place to exercise and practice the said law is the outer space. In fact, at the moment anybody or anything move into the outer space, it is our ability to go beyond the higher ground.

These laws will generally affect the human kind. However, it is essential to remember that we must still bend to higher power.

Historical Legislation of Astronomy

The Committee on Peaceful Uses of Outer Space or COPUOS of the United Nations established the legal instrument that inhibits the execution of astronomy. This was the first legal instrument ever used. The birth of this law was dated ten years after the Soviet Union stationed the first artificial satellite in revolution around the planet.

Twelve years after, there are four additional laws that arrived. These were all simplifications or explanations of the substance from the first law. Moreover, all of the five laws are conducted at regulating astronomy on the space in an organized manner like the activities performing by Seeplutonow. Additionally, they were all created with satellites while exploring the solar system.

The Laws of Outer Space

The major objective of all the laws is to perform space activity with the incorporation of global cooperation. This is to give benefit for the general public and to utilize the outer space for peaceful intentions. Below are the titles of the laws that are intended for the outer space.

  1. The Treaty of the Outer Space of 1967
  2. Agreement on the Rescue and Return of 1968
  3. The Convention Liability of 1972
  4. The Convention Registration of 1975
  5. The Agreement of the Moon of 1979

Final Thought

Numerous space laws are created by COPUOS. They are generally associated with satellites specifically designed for use by the civilians, shuttles, and stations within the space. Basically, these laws have a major effect on the performance of space astronomy most of the time. And this may call for on campaign speeches.

Closing Of US Mexico Border: Trump’s Real Intent is to Close Ports of Entry

Apparently feeling high on the belief that he has been exonerated from special counsel Mueller’s report of a possible collusion with the Russian government, US president Donald Trump stirs up another controversy. At a rally held in Michigan on last Thursday (March 28, 2019),and in a brief press conference in Mar-a-Lago, in Florida last Friday, Trump reiterated his signature campaign promise of closing the US Border to prevent migrating asylum seekers from coming in.

Trump’s announcement actually came as a threat directed at the Mexican government. He accuses Mexico of not doing anything to stop the unending flow of refugees arriving at the border, coming from Guatemala, El Salvador and Honduras. Naturally, his threat drew negative reactions, more so when he followed up his threat with tweets that he will make good on that threat this week.

Does Trump Really Have the Power to Close the US Mexico Border?

If Trump insists on imposing such action, he will do so at the risk of violating immigration laws that forbid anyone to deny protection to people seeking sanctuary in the country, regardless of the manner with which they gained entry. It can be recalled that Trump previously attempted to suppress the entry of a massive number of immigrants arriving at the border by invoking national security rules. However, Judge Jon S. Tigar of the San Francisco District Court placed a restraining order on Trump’s planned action.

Closing the border therefore, and specifically for that purpose is in defiance of immigration laws and of the judge’s order as well.

Trump is Using Border Wall Closing as Excuse to Carry Out Another Tactic

A senior Trump administration officer explained by way of telephone interview with Dara Lind of Vox, is that what the president had actually meant was to control the flow of people coming in by closing official ports of entry at the border. Although the senior administration officer added that closing of port entries is a last resort, border agents are currently being moved to the border areas to àttend to the refugees apprehended.

Acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney explicitly stated

”we need the people from the ports of entry to go out and patrol in the desert where we don’t have a wall”

As a result, reduced number of border agents manning the ports of entry has already slowed down flow of traffic. Business communities at El Paso are already apprehensive about the long- waits occurring at the ports. San Diego, does not want a repeat of the November 2018 temporary shutdown of the San Ysidro port of entry. Even if the border agents were deployed only for a few hours to respond with force against an organized group of asylum seekers, the temporary closure resulted to the loss of $5.3 million in business revenues.

What Trump wants to happen is to discourage American companies from moving operations to Mexico, using it as leverage for Mexico to act on the asylum seekers making their way to the US border. To Trump, he considers it as the price Mexico has to pay. Yet, he seems to disregard the fact that an estimated $1.5 billion worth of business transpires daily along the US Mexico border, as millions of people legally cross the border as part of their daily routine.

Politics Making Public Health Solutions Possible

For most health centers such as the Gastro Center NJ, researchers and medical practitioners, the nature of public health is a struggle to comprehend and recognize the reasons and repercussion of demise, ailments, and incapacities. Frequently an even bigger struggle arises when legislators try to put work out that understanding, to transform comprehension into deeds for our collective welfare and health.

Importance Of Politics In Public Health

Science can find answers to persistent problems regarding public health, however only politics could transform the majority of those solutions into actuality. Whether it is for the best or not, politics has a decisive role in affairs concerning health.

Politics is pivotal in identifying how the people and legislators distinguish and describe problems with the prevailing social environments as well as policies and regulations, in assisting specific types of interventions for public health, and in producing a variation of challenges in the execution of policies.

It is vital that public health experts and specialists comprehend the political aspects of problems and the recommended solutions, whether or not they have positions in the government, research and advocacy groups, or in the industry of health care. This awareness can aid leaders to better foresee possible temporary restrictions as well as opportunities for change.

When it comes to public health, actions from the government is usually involved to generate results, such as the prevention of injury, harm and diseases or promotion of wellness, that most people are improbable or incapable to yield on their own. To achieve public health, it should be perceived as something that needs collaboration and collective effort and not as an undertaking for a single person.

Collective And Voluntary Action

Even though this outlook is profoundly embedded in majority of students, researchers, and practitioners in public health, this perception counteracts to a basic stress on economic individualism, property rights, and competition in the political culture in America.

America lies in its anti-statist ideas, wherein Americans are not much troubled with the actions done by the administration to individuals to benefit than what the government could do to control or have power over them. As far as Americans favor collective and collaborative action in the quest of public health or anything that is for the social good, they display a solid preference for charitable or voluntary group and involvement.

Distinguishing Conservation And Efficiency To Better Deal With Global Energy Crisis

Strømavtaler or power agreements as well as resolving the sporadic energy crisis has to take a good deal of social responsibility and action merged with the support of the government. Because of the escalating energy outlays, global front-runners are compelled to conclusively begin to explore energy alternatives and make available the finance needed to make and implement these changes. Concerns such as global warming are a mainstream truth and triggers global alarms on pollution and energy consumption.

Before political leaders, whether local, national or international, as well as the people address these concern on energy crisis, it is paramount to understand the dissimilarity between conservation and efficiency.

Energy Conservation vs. Efficiency

Conservation of energy and energy efficiency are very critical matters discussed by global leaders especially in terms of our dependence on the natural resources of the planet. Presently, there is a universal call for sources of energy. Forecasts by the International Energy Agency states that by 2030, the globe will be exhausting 50% more oil, which produces the majority of our energy. Hence, it is imperative to first comprehend the how energy conservation and energy efficiency are different from each other to better tackle and deal with the energy crisis and renewable energy alternatives and tactics.

What Is Energy Conservation?

Energy conservation is the action taken to save energy by way of diminishing or decreasing a service. This means that to conserve energy, one must have to reduce on energy usage. Simple instances would include switching off the lighting fixtures when not in use, opting for public transport or walking instead of using your own car, or by obtaining a thermostat that you can program so as to control the temperature of the room.

What Is Energy Efficiency?

Energy efficiency is described as saving energy however retaining the similar degree of service. For instance, conservation is observed when lights are switched off when not utilized, on the other hand, energy efficiency is applied if you substitute wasteful incandescent light bulbs with a fluorescent bulb that are compact and more efficient.

With that, the government and global leaders can appropriately act on the energy crisis as well as to urge the energy sector as well as the industry on technology and business to proactively involve themselves in resolving energy crisis which will ultimately deliver weighty benefits for the economy, ecosystem and communities.

Numbers of Bankruptcies in Agricultural Sector Soar After Trump Tariffs

Trade rifts with other countries borne by the Trump Tariffs signed by Donald Trump in January 2018, is now taking its toll on U.S. farmers. Wall Street Journal (WSJ) recently reviewed federal data pertaining to the Chapter 12 Bankruptcy Protection extended by US courts to farmer or fisherman families. The results of WSJ’s review revealed that the rate by which US farmers have filed for Chapter 12 Bankruptcy Protection, has soared.

District Courts covering the states of Arkansas, Indiana, Illinois, and Kansas, among others are seeing sharp increases in petitions for bankruptcy protection. The Eight Circuit Court of Appeals shows a swelling of numbers by 96%; the Seventh Circuit garnered twice the number of petitions received when compared to the 2008 figures, while the Tenth Circuit saw a 59% increase from what they had a decade ago.

The Bankruptcy Trend is Expected to Transpire in Other Business Sectors

Initially, the sets of tariff imposed on importation of solar panels and washing machines, and later on steel and aluminum, seemed far from creating adverse impact on the agricultural sector. However, as the exports of foreign trading partners suffered a blow from Trump’s importation tariffs, their nation retaliated by also imposing import tariffs on US products entering their respective territories. Retaliatory actions came not only from China, but from EU member countries, Canada, and Mexico.

Exportation of US homegrown agricultural products like soybeans, coffee, oranges and other produce such as pork, dairy and whiskey, just to name a few, has become less competitive. Retaliatory import tariffs had weakened the trading positions of US agricultural exporters.

The trade rift with China turned into a full-blown Trade War, when Trump announced in July 2018 that all Chinese products and goods purchased by U.S. businesses from China will be meted with 25% importation duties. The value estimated at $50 billion worth, all the more created an impasse. Trump’s move only increased the cost of materials and components used by US manufacturers in assembling or in producing their goods.

Although negotiations are currently underway, US farmers and other affected businesses are not seeing enough income that will allow them to recover from ballooning debts; or even in continuing their operations.

A Cursory Look into U.S. Laws Governing Possession, Transport, Transfer or Use of Airsoft Guns

In a recent public disturbance in Albuquerque, New Mexico, the man carrying two airsoft rifles in plain sight, was merely questioned and later released by the responding police officers. Had the incident happened in another state or country, the carrying of a replica gun in public would have been treated as a criminal offense.

As it is, U.S. laws governing the use and handling of non-powder replica firearms like airsoft guns, vary from state to state; making it important for airsoft gun proponents to know what a state considers as legal or illegal before transferring, selling, transporting or buying a realistic-looking replica firearm.

U.S.Federal Laws Governing Non-Powder Airsoft and BB Guns

Airsoft and BB guns are generally used for recreational combat competitions, as props in movies and for simulated military or police training. An airsoft rifle or handgun with the most realistic-looking appearance and features, are therefore the most attractive. On a nationwide level, there are no specific federal laws that restrict the use, ownership, or sale of replica firearms.

Federal statutory limitations are mostly concerned with “substantial product hazard/s,” particularly their potential risks of causing injury to children. That being the case, the federal government explicitly prohibits the sale of replica weapons to minors.

The government agency tasked to regulate and oversee the manufacture and sale of mock weapons is the Consumer Product Safety Commission. Specifically, federal product regulations require the following:

  • Replica or “look-alike firearms” must have a blaze orange plug-insert, permanently affixed in the barrel of the mock weapon.
  • A similar marking must appear on the external surface of the barrel.
  • Construction of a non-powder firearm must make use of transparent or translucent materials.
  • Additionally, federal regulations require covering the lookalike weapon using specific bright colors.

The aforementioned regulations override any state law that is inconsistent with the stated requirements.

Autonomous Power of State Governments to Impose Laws on Non-Powder Firearms

In the U.S., every state government has the autonomous power to impose statutes regulating the sale, ownership and use of non-powder, pellet-powered replica firearms. However, under federal regulations, such laws must not include prohibitions on the sale of conventional mock weapons.

The States of Delaware, Connecticut and North Dakota appear to have the most rigid laws pertaining to non-powder replica firearms, because they define such articles as “dangerous weapons.” That being the case, it is illegal in those states to carry or transport mock firearms without a duly approved permit.

In most U.S. regions, state governments define non-powder replica guns as Firearms and therefore subjecting the use, sale, ownership, transfer, and possession of non-powder guns to the state’s Firearms Law. Majority of state laws, regardless of their definition of a replica non-powder gun, strictly impose age restrictions, as well as explicitly prohibit the carrying of mock firearms in school grounds.

In some jurisdictions, low caliber, low velocity airsoft guns are excluded from the firearms definition. Click here to gather more information about airsoft rifles and handguns with low or high caliber and rate of velocity.

 

𐌢