Monday
November 27th, 2006


84 users online


Tools
  Search
  Customizer
  Login
  FAQ
  Get Profile
  Gitmo Cookbook
  inthehat news
  Logout
  Lost Password
  New Account
  Search
  Submit a Link
  Zebrality

Daily Page | Zebrality | 2010 Football Pool | General Chat | Latest Comments


Flying imam alertMonday, November 27th, 2006 Wal-Mart expands drug program to 11 states

The GOP's Demographic Drop Of Doom In 2006
     The New York Times has a fascinating breakdown of exit polling data that goes from 1982 all the way to the present. Here's how the GOP did this time around with some of the key demographic groups, compared to last mid-terms in 2002 (The first number is the percentage of that group's vote that the GOP received. The 2nd number in parenthesis, is the percentage change from 2002). go to story
...
(read story)[Posted at 9:01 AM by kris]

 

#  November 27th, 2006 3:29 PM      REV
- PHTbltttht! "New York Slimes"!!! They are as accurate and PRO-American as "Al Jazerah"!!!  
 
#  November 28th, 2006 9:40 PM      REV
When a candidate with backbone and guts steps up and proudly embraces Conservatism and boldly proclaims Conservatism that candidate WILL WIN.  
 
#  December 5th, 2006 9:45 AM      mbrlr
In regards to Rev's 1st post: That's nonsense. And how exactly does one pronounce "PHTbltttht"?

In regards to Rev's 2nd post: No. I think we're at one of those cultural and political shifts.  
 
#  December 5th, 2006 4:39 PM      mbrlr
Regarding point 1: Maybe John Adams would have done it, but the Alien and Sedition Acts are generally viewed as blots on his record, and a free press with precisely the ability to keep tabs on government is what was intended. Read the Federalist Papers.

Regarding point 2: Reagan won as a conservative, but actually governed as a moderate, as hard as that is for me to say. Certainly when it came to foreign affairs, he did precisely what all Presidents since Truman had done concerning the Soviets. It took 40 years, but the Soviets finally folded both from our persistence on both sides of the aisle and all the internal problems. Nixon was probably quite conservative, but he governed as an interventionist, from detente to internal policy. He wasn't a Goldwater...who lost really, really big...conservative. The conservative movement didn't pick up until Johnson managed to get the Civil Rights Act and the Voting Rights Act passed. My fellow white Southerners acted like jackasses, ironically, and moved over to the carpetbagger party in droves. Hello, Nixon. Hello, Reagan. With their ability to appoint justices to the Supreme Court, we have hello, George W.

3. Okay. My 3 year old is giving me a bronx cheer and I didn't even know it. I'll try to think of an upper South equivalent.

Bonus: "Liberalis=Big-Government=Socialism=Leftism=Communism=Slavery=Tax-HIKES=OPPRESSIVE Regulations=EVIL=Liberalism." Wow. I would suggest that it should be:

Liberals =
1) Necessary and constitutional roles for government requiring responsible growth
2) Nothing near socialism if you've ever read anything about it or been to Scandinavia
3) Left rather than right and that's very good
4) Nothing near communism, for heaven's sake
5) We fought a war over that and then reneged on the promises made for another 100 years and are still dealing with that particular sin and its aftermath
6) Taxes that government uses for quite necessary and constitutional purposes and functions. Deal with the fact that it takes money to run the government
7) Necessary regulations because industry won't police itself and history bears that out
8) I'd say good and you say evil and that's a perfect illustration of a democratic society, so long as we keep it civil
9. Yep, liberalism

Out of curiousity, what is your take on the Civil Rights Act, Brown v Board of Education, and our history of segregation and prejudice?  
 

 

 

Leave a comment
username you need an account to post comments
password get one here
comment
Use quick format (?)

 

 

Copyright © 2004, 2005 dummocrats.com.



  page rendered in 0.0809 seconds