Arraignment Seals Trump’s Fate as First Ex-US Pres. to Be Criminally Indicted

A 16-page indictment document read last April 04,2023 in a Manhattan Court in New York, sealed Donald Trump’s fate as the first ex-US Pres. to be indicted on multiple criminal charges. The charges partly stemmed from the “hush money” paid to and received by former porn star Stormy Daniels. However, the payment was linked to several felonious acts of document falsification and misrepresentations as they made use of election campaign funds.

The Manhattan legal district office with whom former Trump personal lawyer Michael Cohen cooperated, released an accompanying 13-page “Statement of Facts” detailing the circumstances supporting the indictment charges.

Brief Summary of the April 04, 2023 Indictment Charges

According to the “Statement of Facts” hush money was actually paid to three women with whom Trump had extra-marital affairs. The payout was allegedly part of a personwl clean-up act for Trump’s 2016 presidential candidacy campaign. Yet Stormy Daniels continued to make threats to divulge details of Trump’s extra-marital affairs with her. Not unless she received additional “hush money” to which Trump’s personal lawyer Michael Cohen was able to negotiate a $130K deal.

As the turn of events took place in 2018 during Trump’s tenure as president , Michael Cohen and other Trump cohorts served time in prison for charges of several crimes. The charges included the Trump Organization’s attempt to build a Trump Tower business in Russia. Although Trump’s other associates chose to remain loyal by not divulging information to reduce their prison terms, Michael Cohen chose to cooperate instead.

Cohen testified that documents were falsified to cover up the hush money he personally paid to Stormy Daniels. The latter, on the other hand, appeared before a grand jury and testified about her extra-marital affair with Trump at the time when Melania Trump was pregnant.

What Dogs (Can) Say About Politicians

With Brexit being a hot topic in the news, Boris Johnson has been put under fire by the British press. For a politician who is so in the crossfire of criticism, he’s also had to deal with a new roommate for Number 10. His new roommate is a 15-week-old Jack Russell Terrier that Boris Johnson and his girlfriend adopted from a shelter.

Just like humans, animals need a good start in life to be able to reach their full potential. The Prime Minister has always been a passionate supporter of animal welfare and has always believed that animals need a good start in life.

The Brexit drama is a very difficult topic to discuss. There are so many different factors to consider when taking a stance on this issue. It is hard to know how someone will react if you support or are against Brexit. However, many believe that if one adopts a dog with crooked teeth could be a good person. The focus here now is not on the dogs or the shelter where they came from. But it’s all about bringing out the human, compassionate side of everyone.

Read also: Are Images Important In Political Communication

Twitter account for Attila

If you first assume that politicians are normal people, there is of course a certain basic probability that one or the other also has a dog. The fact that there is sometimes more behind it can be deduced from the fact that politicians often very consciously make their love of animals public. For example, former US President George W. Bush’s dog, Terrier Barney, had its own page on the White House website. In Germany, Attila, the dog of the Thuringian Prime Minister Bodo Ramelow, has a Twitter account that is mainly maintained by his Italian wife.

“Of course, it’s an exciting idea to comment on the Prime Minister’s work from a dog’s point of view,” says Hamburg political advisor Martin Fuchs. “I found it extremely smart when he commented on political statements and activities. For example, when he complains that his master hasn’t been home for so long. Actually, a criticism of his master, which then shows: The guy works his ass off for Thuringia.”

Self-portrayal with a pet

The whole thing is in a larger context, explains Prof. Trebbe: We know from the development of social media that there is a tendency to disclose private information in order to convey social skills in addition to political skills. According to the motto: “Look here, I’m a person like you, I have a dog and I even get him from the animal shelter.” Of course, you score points with that.

This self-portrayal with a pet goes back centuries. Many kings and emperors had their portraits taken with their dogs. The four-legged darling of the Dutch national hero Prince William of Orange (1533-1584) was even carved in marble after his death: as part of a pompous funerary monument in the New Church in Delft, he rests forever at the feet of his master.

Pug Pompey is said to have even saved Orange’s life once: the prince slept while his enemies approached. Then the attentive “hondje” woke him up so that he could get to safety. Significantly, Oranien was considered an extremely successful propagandist in his own right, who knew how to use the new medium of printed pamphlets for his own purposes.

Unpleasant surprise at Putin

The image of the dog is not always the same. There’s the cute dog and the big, dangerous one. A few years ago, Russian President Vladimir Putin gave Angela Merkel an unpleasant surprise with his Labrador Koni. Allegedly, he knew nothing of the Chancellor’s fear of dogs. “Dogs also have a macho tradition,” says Trebbe. “You come from the hunt to the human being. The fact that politicians who pride themselves on their masculine qualities adorn themselves with big dogs is intended to underline their strength.”

Incidentally, in the case of Boris Johnson, Trebbe is not sure whether the purchase of Dilyn was really a clever move. “It could also be dangerous, because there’s been a cat called Larry in Downing Street for a long time, and he’s very popular.” He has 323,000 followers on Twitter. ‘Supposedly Larry has been showing up less since Boris Johnson took office. If that were to be confirmed, you could still say at the end: ‘Now he even scared away the nice cat.’

Conclusion: If Pets Can Talk

If pets can talk, they can be a living testimony of how their “humans” treat them. The way we nurture and treat our pets, what we provide even in the smallest things like dog beds, for example, shows how we naturally treat other people too. Our pets greatly reflect our personalities. And the same goes for politicians.

 

What Cars Should Politicians Drive?- Why It Matters!

The car that a politician chooses to drive can be a powerful tool in the campaign. It can provide an opportunity to show off their personality or reveal the way they want to be seen.

Politicians use cars as a way of showing who they are, how they see themselves, and what they want people to see. They are also used as a symbol of status and power.

Do you want to drive the same brand of cars that politicians drive? Yes, you can! With Nobull, this is possible. You can choose a wide range of car brands and models just like the brands that your many politicians drive.

The Best Car Brands for Politics

Politicians always need to be on their toes and ready to speak their minds. A car is a crucial part of a politician’s life. It is not just a means of transportation but also a symbol of status.

Politicians need cars that are reliable, easy to drive, and safe in case of emergencies. They also need cars that are able to handle heavy traffic and can get them from point A to B without any issues.

The best car brands for politics are Tesla, Mercedes-Benz, BMW, Porsche, Audi, and Jaguar Land Rover.

Politicians want to be seen as forward-thinking and environmentally conscious by the public. When they are spotted driving a Tesla, Mercedes-Benz, BMW, Porsche, Audi, or Jaguar Land Rover in their daily lives it tells people that they’re committed to the environment.

Read also: The lifestyle of a Politician

Automakers are recently joining the political stage

Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla, spoke with President Trump about a carbon tax and electric vehicles. In Germany, Mercedes-Benz has partnered with Chancellor Angela Merkel to promote her campaign for another term as chancellor. As a result, Mercedes-Benz’s stock has increased and they have seen an increase in sales in their car models. Audi is going to be a big player in the new US tax plan.

In the aftermath of the election, several automakers have become more activist in their politics to promote industry growth and security. In 2017, the President-elect’s position on American manufacturing has been a focal point of many industry groups and companies, some of which have joined together to form a coalition that would oppose Mr Trump’ s plans.

You Can’t Be a Politician Without an Awesome Ride- Here’s Why.

Politicians are all about their image. They want to be seen as a person of the people, someone who has their best interests at heart. And what better way to do so than by driving around in a luxury sports car?

The cars that politicians use say a lot about them. A Mercedes-Benz is for someone who wants to seem classy and sophisticated, whereas an Audi R8 is for someone who wants to seem more like an everyday person. Sometimes, the car that they drive also says something about their political party too.

In India, there are many luxury sports car brands available in the market such as BMW, Audi and Mercedes-Benz which can be used by politicians as well as celebrities.

Politicians Love Their Workboots…And Sneakers?

Politicians love their workboots. They are the embodiment of their public persona, the symbol of power and prestige. That is why they are often seen wearing them on social media, in interviews, and even during speeches.

People who know what it takes to make a good pair of work boots (delta plus work boots come with a 1 year warranty) will know that they should last long enough to be passed down from generation to generation.

Sneakers are entering the picture of Politics?

Politicians are now wearing sneakers with fashion

Fashion has always been a big part of politics. For example, the first president to wear an overcoat was Rutherford B. Hayes in 1877, and Ronald Reagan was the first politician to start wearing sneakers with his fashion. Boots are still in. Recently, however, more and more politicians are sporting their sneakers in a fashionably casual manner.

Let’s take a look…

Joschka Fischer and his white sneakers

It is impossible to talk about the relationship between sneakers and politics without naming Joschka Fischer. When the German politician took his oath of office as the first Green Minister in the state government of Hesse in 1985, he wore white high-top sneakers from Nike. This was not only a statement against any (dress) rules that had existed in politics for decades but also a symbol of the Greens as a lifestyle party for young, cool, urban people. And at the same time, his choice of shoes was no less controversial for Green voters, since Nike stood for American capitalism, which the Greens actually rejected. But even then, politics and lifestyle were not mutually exclusive.

But it wasn’t always just young, progressive politicians who staged themselves in sneakers. When the Bavarian Minister of the Interior, Günther Beckstein, from the conservative CSU, campaigned in 2007, he was given white and blue Adidas running shoes by his parliamentary group. More than ten years ago, this caused such a stir that it was reported nationwide. However, his attempt to appeal to a younger electorate failed miserably – too intentionally, not authentically enough, especially since the textile symbol of the sneaker was not otherwise associated with any political change.

Kamala Harris in her Chucks

In the USA, politicians make things smarter with their sneakers: the sneakers on them always carry a political message. Now, in what is probably the most important election campaign in American history, we can observe this very concretely with Kamala Harris, the Democratic vice-presidential candidate. They wear one specific shoe more often than average: classic Chucks.

It may be that she just likes to wear Chucks – like millions of other people. For personal reasons, perhaps because they remind her of her youth. But deeper these shoes also have a message. Chucks are originally basketball shoes, and basketball is a sport traditionally dominated by black athletes. In addition, the brand belongs to the Nike Group, and the latter supports politically committed athletes who oppose conservative tendencies, police violence or systemic racism.

In addition, the shoes that Kamala Harris so often wears are the embodiment of democratic thought. There is hardly anyone who does not like them, they have been picked up and worn by a wide variety of cultures and subcultures, such as the grunge or skate punk scene.

Read also: Manchin the Democratic Senator Who Will Block the Build Back Better Bill Benefiting Ordinary Americans

Barack Obama in his Adidas Stan Smith sneakers

Other Democratic politicians have also repeatedly staged themselves with sneakers. While Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton, and Al Gore were concerned with presenting themselves as agile, sporty, and vital as possible, the former president, Barack Obama also stood for change in this regard. When he appeared in his Adidas Stan Smith sneakers, he was demonstrating to young, urban intellectuals: I’m one of you.

Senator Ed Markey recently did the same (although at 74 he is anything but young): he often posts himself in his Nike sneakers, which have meanwhile been completely worn out – and reaped enthusiastic comments from young sneakerheads.

Cool sneakers are something of a matter of course for democratic politicians today. Senator Elizabeth Warren likes to wear athletic models, and fellow Texan Wendy Davis drew attention when she paired sneakers with a formal suit.

Those sneakers – Surely it’s more than just sneakers!

The thin-soled, completely worn-out sneakers that Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez wore constantly during one of her election campaigns even made it into the museum in 2018 as part of the exhibition “Women Empowered: Fashions from the Frontline” at Cornell University in the US state of New York. Sneakers are the new work shoes – and in the USA they also demonstrate a closeness to the people that opponents of the Democrats are happy to deny.

The Battle for Power in Government and Business

Politics and power within an organization or business just as those hotel bei Schloss Neuschwanstein are somewhat comparable to the traditional government’s political structure. In which we know that the authority is distributed across the different areas of the system in which that power is executed.

Politics in the Government and in the Business

Oftentimes, there are other sources of power that is competing for control, which is not actually a bad thing. Unless someone decided to take it the dirty way. The organization’s internal politics on the other hand could be polarized as well since everyone can relate to one side of the story over the other. Sadly, this is regardless of how neutral they try to react. In a nutshell, organizational politics and power in the business can also be a fascinating thing and at the same time, unique, which can bring a huge impact on organizational behavior.

The Thirst for Power

Struggles for power are pretty common in society, not just in the government and business. One individual is shooting something from someone and yet, that person is not willing to give in. As a result, that person might exert their own authority and power to persuade the other party to concede instead.

It is actually a tactic that could work on any given occasion. However, it might make the situation become more of a toxic and combative environment than peaceful and democratic when it fails. In most cases, this happens between employees, coworkers as well as their supervisor and even on management, other departments as well as in boardrooms.

Control of Power

Being able to stay out of the thirst for power is truly a skill that gives you a lot in the business, so long as it is used in protecting yourself. Being able to survive the power struggle is usually the end goal no matter what industry your business is operating.

Still, there is the aftermath that needs to be dealt with when everything settles down and its impact could hit anyone who is too close to it. According to experts, they say that if you like to be involved in a power challenge, then it is imperative to not acknowledge the position of the person in the given argument, rather their feelings.

Personal Life of Public Officials

A lot of factors in our lives are not made available to public. However, if one enters into a public life, like deciding to rule and govern a country, a state, or even just a small place, the private life and each factor of it will be made publicly available. It is not as easy as hiring the best painters colorado to cover what should be covered. Your life will be an open book to public and this is already given when entering politics.

First factor can be the public official’s or politician’s health. A public servant whether he like it or not must be transparent when it comes to his or her well-being. It is because people will always love to see their leader in good shape. This will also give the public the assurance that the leader will be able to serve the people all the time and perform his duties in a great manner.

Another factor is the finances. It is essential, ever since, for a public official to be open about his assets and everything. This is to show the public that there is no corruption happening under their leader’s administration. This is one of the biggest issue in the world of politics. Leaders of a state are like treasurers as well. The money or funds allocated for a particular project and those that should be given away to people must go to the said path.

Lastly, even if it is really too personal, a leader’s family life will also be shown to the public. That is why a leader’s principle, dignity, and integrity not just in serving the people will be monitored by the people who trust them. His or her family life matters to many because how a leader handles a family will always be a reflection of how he govern the people.

 

Koch’s Political Advocacy Group Shows Manchin as Traitor to Democratic Causes

Democratic Sen.Joe Manchin of W.Va. is opposing key points of his party’s agenda as he faces pressure from billionaire Charles Koch’s political advocacy group. While Republicans oppose the Democrat’s legislation about voting rights known as “For the People Act,” and the proposed filibuster reform, branding the bills as ambitious and unpopular partisan ploys, Joe Manchin despite being a Democratic Senator plans to side with the Republican Senators.

The political network Koch has is only one of many other groups that has arranged outside efforts just for the sake of countering bills put forward by the Democratic Party. Apparently, the lobbying effort of the Koch’s advocacy group is hitting the nail on the head for the GOP, since Manchin’s decision is not to vote in favor of the two important bills.

In exasperation, President Biden has described the Republicans’ proposed voting restrictions as “un-American” and even “sick. The POTUS on the other hand, praised the “For the People Act, while verbally agreeing that the filibuster must indeed be modified.

Americans for Prosperity Foundation Advocacy Group

The Koch brothers’ main political advocacy group is the Americans for Prosperity Foundation, which even introduced a website called West Virginia Values. The group has been encouraging the people of West Virginia to email Joe Manchin to reject Washington’s partisan agenda and to be “The Voice West Virginia Needs In DC”

The website carries the same list of items that the W.VA senator has vowed to oppose his party; among them includes packing the Supreme Court, the For the People Act, the filibuster’s elimination, the POTUS’ infrastructure plan and the union-friendly PRO Act.

What is There to Like About Biden? or Trump?

Biden builds his campaign by hosting small and socially distanced campaign events, whilst sending populist economic messages in courting all types of voters. Trump’s campaign on the other hand, are built on waging personal attacks and making fun of Biden to amuse his supporters; claiming without any evidence that his Democratic rival would delay the vaccine and “prolong the pandemic.”

Yet even as different polls tell us that Biden is leading, the memories of the 2016 elections still hang in the political air. That is why Democrats cannot rest until after the outcome of the November election; or should they, if ever Trump gets re-elected?

Even if Trump does not have any policies or plans to discuss, nor has taken solid actions in addressing the pandemic other than make promises about a forthcoming vaccine, many of his supporters still come out in droves. While Trump is still making promises about healthcare plans and at the same time dismantling the existing Affordable Care Act that the less privileged found beneficial, we still cannot say for sure that Trump will not be re-elected.

Apparently, the outcome of the November 2020 election will define us as a nation. Either as a group of people with strong political will to change things for the good of all; or as a country where falsehoods, racism, social inequality, despotism and lack of concern for the environment is the prevailing political mandate.

What is there to like about Joe Biden that he will be able to unify a divided country to work together? What is there to like about Trump that will change my mind in voting for Biden? There’s a quick answer to the latter question: Nothing.

Citing Examples of What to Like About Biden

Although Biden appeared to be just a bungling old politician prone to committing gaffes and forgetting things during the race for nomination as presidential Democratic candidate, he still won over younger and seemingly wiser contenders. Even if Biden was not my personal choice, one thing I came to like about Joe Biden is that he was able to transform into a competent and formidable opponent in facing Trump.

Apparently, Biden possesses one of the important qualities that make a great leader. That of listening to reason and of heeding reasonable advice, which Trump obviously lacks.

Another thing I came to like about Biden is seeing him lay the ground for unification, starting with his rivals in the contest for Democratic nomination. He has been working with his closest rivals, Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren and Pete Buttigieg in formulating policies that he will present to the nation.

This Democratic presidential candidate carefully mulled over his choice of Vice Presidential candidate in choosing Senator Kamala Harris; despite the latter’s aggressive stance toward him in one of the Democratic debates. He checkmarked Sen. Harris’ qualities as a potential partner who will help him carry out plans for the good of the American people, and not for his personal enrichment.

During the disastrous debate between him and Trump, Biden showed temperament and ability to present himself as an unwavering target of a political bully. Qualities that will make him appear respectable when convening with other world leaders, instead of being the center of jokes like Trump was. Yes, aside from the policies Joe Biden presented, there are a lot of examples of things to like about him.

Attractiveness of A Politician: An Advantage

Politics is a very complicated topic. Not everyone is interested, and not everyone has the same opinions and perceptions. From determining who should be elected, to electing who you think will serve the public better, to knowing the result of the votes of the state.

People, especially the young ones, are not that conscious when it comes to selecting who should be in the position. If you are going to ask them, answers will surely be full of pretensions. They will give you technical answers and talk about the platforms the politicians mentioned during the campaign. They might also mention how nice they think the politician will be if he or she will be elected. But they will never ever mention that they voted for this particular person because of the physical appearance.

Some studies have shown that unconsciously, people really vote for a candidate with a nicer physical appearance. They are attracted with the overall charisma of a candidate and not totally disregard, but forget the actual things to be taken into account in determining who to vote or elect.

With this, politicians should not just focus on taking care of the people, but also consider what their people think of them, how they look at them, and what kind of physical image they see. If there are two politicians who are competent for the position, but the other one’s physical appearance is not as good as his or her competitor, chances are, the competent politician with a glowing skin will win the election. So if one is planning to run and be a candidate for a certain public position, skin care like acne scar removal will really be a big help. This is not a requirement, however if you are really into serving the public, and you believe you have the cleanest and clearest intentions, might as well do everything and enhance your physical image for a total package.

 

Are Houses of Politicians Always Big

Politicians are never our of the picture when it comes to news and current political events. This is because their job is very crucial in achieving a better world. We often think that since politicians include job wherein they are to handle to country’s money, it involves dirty work especially in third world countries where corruption is very rampant. Regardless of how they work, one thing is certain, they have plenty of money and make sure that their belongings reflect their social status. This had been my assumption until recently when I bumped in to a documentary on the internet about the lifestyle of a politician. For the sake of the politician’s privacy, I will not drop the name because what  is important is something that proved me wrong upon watching the documentary.

As mentioned earlier, most of us probably have a thinking that politicians are making too much money, especially politicians who are in high position – the ones we see in television. One factor that probably affects that way of thinking is the way politicians present themselves – clothing, the way they speak, stand, walk, and a lot more. In addition to that, we often see them in a black SUV, assuming that it is their car  that serves as their service as well. More often that not, they have a driver because they are going to different places every day and driving should not add up as stress or hassle to them. With this, we then assume that they have luxurious lifestyle – grand house and expensive cars.

On the other hand, there may be a lot of politicians who want to live in a life of luxury but there are still some who choose to have simple life. In the documentary that I watched, the house of a certain politician is simple yet it looks very classy because of the interior design, specifically how the walls were painted – colors and details. When the politician was asked who made it. they said that they hired the painters calgary. They offer quality service in affordable rates.

The documentary also features the cars of the politician. Upon watching it, that is only the time when I realized that not all politicians are the same.

Architect-Politicians from the Modern History

The majority of the architect’s working hours have been spent coordinating people’s attempts to bring about a whole that is greater than the components they’re currently providing particularly when creating modern buildings or establishments. In building modern establishments, polished concrete in Gold Coast AU is one of the materials used.  Here is a rundown of architect-politicians from history that illustrate, as a reminder of this effect being an architect may have on public company. In the improvement of housing to war crimes’ perpetration, the profession’s participation in politics has had both negative and positive results on the entire world. For the fledgling architect-politicians of today, the challenge of the future will probably be building on the positive elements of this background.

James Goold Cutler

His own participation shows the impact architects could have on politics – although cutler’s time in office had been – he had been the mayor of Rochester, New York for three years. He was best known for inventing the mail chute. That the work of an architect-politician integrates both community business and an innovative solution to buildings speaks into the program the abilities of a designer may have in government.

Margarete Schütte-Lihotzky

By opting to engage in a career in any respect already a leader in her day, Margarete Lihotzky was the first girl in Austria. Her public service began in the 1920s when she had been hired by the town of Frankfurt to style a mission that resulted in her creation of this Frankfurt Kitchen – the precedent for version kitchens, employee home. Her participation lasted throughout the 1930s and 40s, as she aided the opposition to the movement by establishing exiled Europeans lines of communication, although she never held office.

Mir-Hossein Mousavi

A winner for democracy in his native Iran, Mousavi is best called that nation’s last Prime Minister prior to the office has been dissolved and also for operating from Mahmoud Ahmadinejad at an extremely contested presidential elections. However he’s been busy, his places have a tendency to catch more attention than his job as an architect. His job was proven to mingle styles with interpretations, although as a pupil, he specialized in traditional architecture.

Harvey Gantt

Prior to serving two terms and exemplifying a combination of an educational background in architecture and town planning Harvey Gantt served in the city council of Carolina. Despite two following attempts for the U.S. Senate, he managed to run a flourishing architecture practice. Reflective of a tendency toward public support, his design work has concentrated on educational and civic buildings, with a focus on consensus among the communities.

Political Communication – YouTube Responds to the Challenge of Becoming a Responsible Social Media Platform

Political institutions encompass not only parties of political candidates seeking for government positions. They also include advocacy organizations pushing for reforms and activists seeking for equality and justice. Now more than ever, social media can provide the most effective channel in which political institutions can deliver their political communication.

There is no shortage of social media platforms in which to communicate ideas, but if for purposes of delivering political messages, Facebook, Twitter and YouTube have become the frontrunners in the array of choices. Yet Twitter is out of the picture as far as political ads are concerned, as Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey prefers promoting political endorsements that garner organic support.

Facebook, albeit leading as a social media platform, suffers from trust issues; given the data breach scandals particularly the Cambridge Analytica case that revealed how Trump’s digital campaign team manipulated FB user accounts in advancing Trump’s political campaign.

Google’s YouTube therefore has become an important Internet marketing space where political institutions can put forward their political communication. Given YouTube’s current ranking as the next largest search engine on a global scale, and its present count of 2 billion active users, the largest video-sharing social media platform has evolved into becoming a major source of political and social information.

It does not come as a surprise at all, why there was a mad scramble among political campaign teams when Google announced the activation of a new advertising app called “Instant Reserve.” The software gives political institutions, tools that enable them to buy and reserve advertising slots in advance. At the same time, they can customize their political advertisement according to their budget, as well as program them to appear in geolocations where the ads will be most timely and relevant.

In addition, Google and its YouTube platform made certain policy changes that aim to avoid committing Facebook’s political advertising errors in the 2016 presidential elections.

Google/YouTube’s New Ad-Targeting Policies

Political adverts appearing in Google and YouTube will have to tailor-fit their advertisement around the age, gender and postcode of their target audience. This denotes that publishers of advertising campaigns can not target voters based on the issues they either support or do not support (e.g. abortion, LGBTQ marriage, marijuana legalization.)

That being the case, uploading personal info data other than the aforementioned demographic factors to target specific sets of audience, is not allowed

Nonetheless, the Google and YouTube platforms will direct political advertisements to users who read and watch content related to specific issues occurring as published content.

The policy updates also address ads and content that aim to mislead voters by insinuating there is voter suppression, or by making unfounded claims that there is a breach in the integrity of the elections. Apparently, this update took into consideration the the slew of fake political news the discouraged millions of voters from going out and exercise their right to vote in the 2016 presidential election.

Understanding the Political and Election Advertising

The technology opens various opportunities to every individual, company, and businesses. Businesses, the marketing side,  benefit a lot from technology. More than three decades ago, a business’ product or service reach their target market through  television, radio, news paper advertisement and other printed advertisement. During that time, businesses find it really hard to reach a wider market the reach of platforms are limited.

On the other hand, marketing these days come in a lot of forms since digital advertising has become available. Since, a lot of people are spending most of their time on the internet, online advertising is the most preferred method of advertising. Google, the most powerful search engine for many years now, are being used by a lot of business to advertise their product or service. Moreover, in order to further utilize the technology, there are software that provides Adwords automation scripts. This will make use of automatic fixing of issues and bugs as well.

Truth in Political Advertising

Not only businesses benefit from this, but also individuals that need to promote their platforms. Politicians during elections make use of online advertising to reach the mass.

However, there are lots of problem and concerns from political advertising. The public’s concern on advertising in general is that not all advertisements tell the truth about a certain product/service. Almost all the time,  what they are telling are only the advantages of using the product. It does not tell for example, that the product will not work on people who have sensitive skin.

Similar in political advertising, it is not most of the time true and accurate.  Almost every one of us can attest to that through a politician that we voted because of his/her campaign but does nothing but to corrupt money from the government.

But if legally speaking, there is actually no law which states that all advertising content must be accurate and true to what it really offers. Hence, during elections, I personally think that politicians are showing false advertising just to manipulate that public on what they can do once they are elected on a certain position.

The lifestyle of a Politician

Why We Think that Majority of Politicians are Rich

In today’s society, we often think of politicians in high position as people who are very rich – has huge house, lots of high end cars, and luxurious lifestyle. While most of them live like that, there are still those who choose to live a simple yet meaningful life with their families. Basically, lifestyle varies from one politician to another. One of the reasons why we think like politicians are rich is because most of them really act like they are big time, even if that is not totally the case since most of them are only doing that for show and to intimidate people. Again, it is subjective.

For this article, we will explain the luxurious lifestyle of politicians, how their house looks like etc. However, we do not conclude that this is how most of them live. It still depends on them.

Politicians Home- every time we see a politician being interviewed on TV, we think “I bet he/she has a huge house”. Apparently yes. Of course politicians think that since they are public figure, their house should reflect their status.

From the curtains, sofa, pillow, and even mattresses from https://www.sleepywill.com/, they make sure that all are in very high quality because price does not matter to them, right? It is a matter of quality.

A politician’s house has at least two floors. Some have three or four. Their thinking is that they want a huge family in the future so it is better to be prepared early.

Cars and other vehicles– this is a very important property of politicians because they are busy people and they go everywhere for a meeting, conference, and many more. Aside from an SUV which they use for travel, they also have at least one personal sedan car which they use for personal appointments and travel.

Basically the main reason why they choose this lifestyle because it has already been part of their every lives, especially travelling around the world. And since they make easy money, they tend to buy most of the things they want.

𐌢