Traditionally, politics and society were viewed as opposites. This separation is rooted in the origin of the word “politics”. In ancient Greece, “pólis” was used to describe the city, soon also the public coexistence in the city, in contrast to the domestic community. The distinction between politics vs. Society has been maintained at its core […]
Continue Reading
Art and politics have always been in a symbolic relationship. This ‘band’ is not static but is in constant change. Like art itself, this relationship changes depending on the socio-political context in which it is incorporated. Artists are inspired by political events and interpret them individually, design counter-worlds, visualize utopias, idealize and denounce. At the […]
Continue Reading
What do you assume of when someone say the words “office politics“? Is it all about “talking about people behind their backs,” giving negative or untrue rumors, and “sucking up” to the correct people? If so, you’ll probably prefer to stay as far away from it as you can! But, like it or not it, […]
Continue ReadingArt Business Governance Government Health Health and Wellness History News
Social, national, religious, and ethnic conflicts, have repeatedly been objects of direct reference and articulation for music and politics is not an exemption. Function and effect Politically instrumentalized music through its inclusion in politics is not yet political music. For example, jazz or twelve-tone technology is not “in themselves” political. Jazz and twelve-tone technique became […]
READ MOREThere is no generally valid, objective definition of politics, but one can deduce from all the different definitions of the term politics. Politics is something that is associated with power, rule, conflict, order, the community, or peace. In the broadest sense of the term, politics describes any negotiation process between people and groups. For instance, […]
READ MOREA motorbike is one of the forms of transportation in the society which is usually for personal use. Hitch carriers for motorcycles are, without question, a very safe method of bringing your motorbikes with you wherever you go as it also provides a hassle-free loading and unloading a motorbike. Regardless of the form of transportation, […]
READ MOREAs soon as tech advancements have rocketed, numerous and various forms of technologies have been developed and are continuously being improved. For instance, if you check out https://fanguider.com/the-best-smartwatches/, you would see how much watches have changed since the first appearance of mechanical pocket watches in the late 19th century. Today, smartwatches aren’t only used to […]
Read MoreWith almost everything happening online, a firm and planned out marketing plan will surely make the cut. Not only is the online worldwide with competitions, but it is also an easy market area but the hardest there is especially when gaining people to actually take a second to check out your space. Digital Marketing Execution […]
Read MoreEven a governmental strategy defines the method of earning official administration selections. It’s traditionally in contrast to this management platform , financial climate , cultural method , and also additional societal devices . This really can be really actually just a simplified opinion of the system of classes between those terms of the authorities sway […]
Know More
The sight of a deer crossing your path can be a magical moment. However, beyond the beauty of this moment, there is often a more profound spiritual significance that many people are unaware of. In various cultures and belief systems, the deer is revered as a powerful symbol of spiritual guidance, offering messages of strength, gentleness, grace, wisdom, and self-discovery.
In many cultures, animals are viewed as guides and messengers that offer insights into one’s path in life. Animal totems or spirit animals remind us of the qualities and attributes important for us to embody in our daily lives. Deer are often considered to be animal totems or spirit animals, representing a variety of qualities that are important for individuals seeking spiritual growth. Let’s learn more about the spiritual meaning of a deer in your path.
The deer is a symbol of strength and gentleness. Their ability to endure and survive in harsh environments is a testament to their strength. However, they also have a gentle nature that allows them to move through the world with grace and kindness. This balance of strength and gentleness is an important reminder to humans that we too can embody these qualities in our own lives.
Deer also represent grace and wisdom. They move through the forest with an unmatched fluidity and grace, reminding us to move through life with a sense of ease and grace. Additionally, their keen senses and ability to survive in the wild remind us of the importance of wisdom and intuition in our lives.
Finally, deer represent innocence and purity. Their delicate appearance and peaceful nature are a reminder of the importance of connecting with our innermost selves and living a life that is true to who we are. This reminder can be particularly powerful for those who are struggling to find their path in life, offering a sense of clarity and direction.
The spiritual significance of a deer crossing your path reminds us of the importance of embracing qualities such as strength, gentleness, grace, wisdom, innocence, and purity in our lives. By recognizing deer’s spiritual messages, we can gain insight into our own lives and find guidance on our journey to self-discovery. Next time you see a deer, appreciate its beauty of the moment and the spiritual message that it may hold for you.
A 16-page indictment document read last April 04,2023 in a Manhattan Court in New York, sealed Donald Trump’s fate as the first ex-US Pres. to be indicted on multiple criminal charges. The charges partly stemmed from the “hush money” paid to and received by former porn star Stormy Daniels. However, the payment was linked to several felonious acts of document falsification and misrepresentations as they made use of election campaign funds.
According to the “Statement of Facts” hush money was actually paid to three women with whom Trump had extra-marital affairs. The payout was allegedly part of a personwl clean-up act for Trump’s 2016 presidential candidacy campaign. Yet Stormy Daniels continued to make threats to divulge details of Trump’s extra-marital affairs with her. Not unless she received additional “hush money” to which Trump’s personal lawyer Michael Cohen was able to negotiate a $130K deal.
As the turn of events took place in 2018 during Trump’s tenure as president , Michael Cohen and other Trump cohorts served time in prison for charges of several crimes. The charges included the Trump Organization’s attempt to build a Trump Tower business in Russia. Although Trump’s other associates chose to remain loyal by not divulging information to reduce their prison terms, Michael Cohen chose to cooperate instead.
Cohen testified that documents were falsified to cover up the hush money he personally paid to Stormy Daniels. The latter, on the other hand, appeared before a grand jury and testified about her extra-marital affair with Trump at the time when Melania Trump was pregnant.
‘New leadership’ was going to be the whole thing this year. After the administrative failure that caused the surcharges affair and the riot around ‘Omtzigt, function elsewhere’, the governance culture had to change. Moreover, D66 used the term during the elections to portray their leader Sigrid Kaag as a serious alternative to VVD member Mark Rutte the people seeing what type of leader he is. Has anyone seen examples of that new leadership, or has it turned out to be an empty shell?
First, what exactly is new leadership? To answer that question, we can’t ignore a funny fact. The party that used the term the most, D66, does not know it either. That is why members last month during the D66 congress instructed the party top to find out what it means exactly. What should in any case be in the definition, the members thought, are ‘honesty’, ‘openness’, and ‘verifiability of decisions’.
In fact, you are already there. It does not take many words to understand what is meant by the three points mentioned. A well-functioning democracy cannot exist without honesty, openness, and accountability of decisions, and it is curious that these qualities are attributed to new leadership. That just goes to show how far the ‘old’ has drifted away from our core democratic values.
On the other hand, it is to be commended that the Administrative Netherlands is openly talking about a change in the administrative culture. It’s a start, just talking about it is of course not enough. Is the transition to a new model getting off the ground?
If we highlight two news items from this week, that does not appear to be the case. ‘The Amsterdam alderman, Rutger Groot Wassink (GL), wanted press questions about a report on anti-gay violence in the capital to be ‘withheld’. The document stated that, according to victims, the perpetrators often have a non-Western background.’ And: ‘Minister Hugo de Jonge (CDA) sent a critical report by the Council for the Judiciary on corona pass in the workplace that was already ready on 17 November, just before Christmas, to the House of Representatives. This makes a debate about this virtually impossible.’
ALSO READ: Safety Tips for Online Shopping
Two examples are the exact opposite of fairness, openness, and accountability of decisions. New leadership will be one of the most used word combinations in the Netherlands, let it be the most chosen form of government in the Netherlands in 2022.
Democrats are anxious about the minimal turnout of young voters among the millions of early voters who showed up, even if historically, they don’t vote early.
According to Tom Bonier, CEO of the Democratic Data company TargetSmart, the need for young voters to come out and grow the numbers before election day is important. What Democratic operatives want to avoid are the shifting of votes, which ex-president Trump and his Republican minions are repeatedly trying to influence by sowing doubts and falsehoods.
As of the moment, early voting data still does not present a clear outcome for the coming November midterm election. About 15 million voters or so have already shown up in the polls to cast their midterm votes. However, the United States Elections Project noted that compared to the early young voter turnout in the previous 2018 midterm elections, only a small fraction of young voters have cast early votes for the 2022 midterm.
There is still a possibility that many could drop out from the 2022 election population, feeling dissatisfied over the Biden administration’s not so sterling performance. Still, the analysts at Tufts University believe that the young voters who supported Biden in the 2020 elections will turn up. The likely motivations for doing so are the Supreme Court’s reversal of the Roe vs. Wade ruling and Biden’s cancellation of student loans.
A performance coach can help you achieve your goals by providing guidance and helping you reach your potential.
Not all coaches are the same. Before hiring one, some things to consider, such as their coaching style, educational background, and experience working with others in the field of business.
As a performance coach, it is essential to know their client’s strengths and weaknesses and find gaps that need improvement. They will also guide how to set goals and plan to achieve them.
Performance coaching can benefit those looking to improve their performance in the workplace or in their lives.
Performance coaching is done one-on-one and is usually customized to each person’s needs and goals. A performance coach works with people on whatever they need, whether learning to be more confident and expressive or overcoming a fear they have.
Performance coaches help athletes, executives, and anyone else who needs help with their performance. They work with their clients by mapping out their strengths and weaknesses to find the correct route to make progress.
The first step is finding an excellent coach for yourself or someone you care about. If you know someone who seems to have it all together, it could be worth asking if they are willing to share their coach with you from time to time.
Performance coaches are being seen as a necessity in our day and age. They are the ones that guide you to take the leap of faith you may be avoiding, they support you when things get tough, they motivate you when progress feels too slow, and they hold your hand when bravery stops being an option.
Using social media in government has many significant benefits, including crisis communication and awareness of campaigns. Social media and government go together like peanut butter and jelly. Why? Social media is a great place to communicate with voters, launch campaigns, and raise awareness of initiatives and is an essential tool for critical communication and also improves the numbers of people that follow via smm.
Whether focused on TikTok, Twitter, Facebook, or another platform, social media always informs the public about important issues and connects and kicks viewers deeper. It will be a solid place for you.
Communicating and interacting with voters will help you establish and build trust unless you use social media to spread the news or connect with the people who follow you.
If you’re serious about using social media to mobilize voters, check out Nextdoor, an app that local governments use to organize city halls, educate citizens on safety issues, and interact with community groups.
In recent years, there have been a sufficient number of crises worldwide. The COVID-19 pandemic and the Russian occupation of Ukraine are just a few examples of decisions beyond national control and legislative decisions that have affected the world.
When an event like the one above occurs, people use social media to search for and collect information, keep up with the latest news, laugh at some memes and calm their fears.
As people seek guidance from the government even in difficult times, legislatures, politicians, and governments are a platform for managing critical communications and regularly providing official updates to citizens worldwide. You should use social media as.
Social media isn’t just for businesses and companies to share their latest product announcements and grow their business in engagement and community. Politicians understand the power of virtual city halls to launch their initiatives and ideas.
In addition, social media is a great place to test your campaign messages. All strategies are low stakes, and you can get instant feedback from people worldwide. Social media is also an opportunity to spread by word of mouth, see trends, and assess relevance.
Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren lauds Pres. Biden for renewing the push for taxes on rich people worth $100 million or more to pay 20% as income tax. The Democratic Senator referred to the Biden administration’s latest proposal to introduce a new tax system that would change the way highly paid corporate executives to pay higher taxes.
Actually top Democratic lawmakers including Sen. Warren have introduced similar proposals before but have not received support before, in being recognized as an agenda; particularly when Kentucky Republican Senator Mitch McConnell was Senate Majority Leader. According to the Senator Warren, what they have been proposing all along is to raise taxes imposed on the country’s millionaires and billionaires, as they are not paying taxes based on the same rates imposed on everyone else.
When Senator Warren campaigned for nomination as the Democratic Party’s 2020 presidential candidate, she proposed an annual tax of two percent (2%) on millionnaires and billionnaires with net worth of at least $50 million and $1 billion, respectively; plus an additional annual four percent (4%) surtax on households with bet worth of over $1 billion.
Moreover, in line with President Biden’s renewed focus on wealthy company executives, the Masschusetts Senator reiterated her criticisms on how major corporations reward their CEOs and investors with stocks that came with buyback options. The compensation method comes with buyback option, which means a CEO or investor has the option to sell for a higher value and pay a lower Capital Gains Tax rate instead of paying higher tax based on the Income Tax Table.
President Biden’s proposal is for a legislation that will require corporate executives to hold ownership of company shares for a specific number of years before selling them as equity shares.
Sen, Joe Manchin recently announced via Fox News that he will not support President Biden’s Build Back Better Bill, which can significantly affect Biden’s plan. The Build Back Better Bills is part of the new US President’s signature domestic policy of helping low and middle income earners improve their economic conditions by broadening their social safety net. According to White House press secretary Jen Psaki, Manchin’s proclamation is a ‘breach of his commitments.
Since Manchin is backing out in his support of the bill, there is little chance for the legislation to become a law as it needs the vote of every Democrat Senator to pass the senate chamber.
The Build Back Better Bill that Democratic senator Joe Manchin refuses to support is built on the following framework:
Saving most American families of money spent on child care, preschool, whilst increasing access to high-quality home care for senior citizens and the disabled. It aims to provide a major tax cut to more than 35 million families by prolonging the Child Tax Credit;
Expanding Medicare coverage to help Americans in older age groups to have access to affordable hearing aid. It also aims to give health care coverage to 4 million uninsured people who have been locked out of Medicaid benefits, while the health premiums of more than 9 million citizens will be reduced.
Make housing and quality higher education affordable and at the same time reduce taxes collected from 17 million low-wage workers by increasing Earned Income Tax Credit. Advance opportunities for ownership through investments in various areas, to help low income citizens for any supply chain shortages and unexpected disruptions like the pandemic.
If you are a businessman, I would like to help you to stop the inevitable fate of the majority of small to medium businesses such as big truck towing san jose. We will now take a look at the top major reasons why you must not associate your business with politics. All of these reasons are interconnected and must occur in sequence.
The first thing that might happen if you openly flex your political party’s flag all over your store is a drastic loss of customers. The logic can be shown with basic mathematics using the official election as an example. For plainness, let’s think that half of your clients were Democrats that are fans of Joe Biden and the other half were Republicans that prefer Donald Trump. If you were to support either party’s campaign stuff in your store doors or windows, then there is a high chance that half of your customers that promote the opposing party might get insulted and never return.
The next major reason why entrepreneurs must not combine their businesses with politics is that it could fall. This reason is normally the last result of the first two points above. If companies lose a lot of customers, then they will lose interest. If they lose a large amount of interest, then they might have to stop the shop from operating.
The last major reason is that your money may suffer. When a business stops, the owner have to depend on some source of income to pay her money. If they do not have any other forms of income, then she will apparently have to get another job right away. Until that income is returned, she will have to use her present wealth to stay alive.
In conclusion, the three primary reasons why you must never think of linking politics with your business are: you will only have few customers; your business could compromise its income, and your money might go to waste.
The House Select Committee investigating the Jan 06 Capitol siege has advanced into asking telecom firms to save the phone records of some GOP House members. The request also includes the phone records of former President Donald Trump and his immediate family members. The purpose of which is to further determine their roles in the “Stop the Steal” rally that instigated the Jan. 06 Capitol insurrection.
It is still not clear how the committee will persuade the companies to cooperate as requesting information from members of the Congress can lead to a legal battle. To date, request letters have been sent to 35 different private-sector entities, including social media sites, email platforms and providers of telecommunication services.
Although the House Select Committee did not disclose which members of Congress are linked to the “Stop the Steal” rally, multiple sources have provided a partial list of names to CNN. Currently, the list includes Republican Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene and Jody Hice of Georgia, Andy Biggs and Paul Gosar of Arizona, Mo Brooks of Alabama, Lauren Boebert of Colorado, Jim Jordan of Ohio, Louie Gohmert of Texas, Scott Perry of Pennsylvania, and Madison Cawthorn of North Carolina.
Not only do they have a connection to the rally, they are also some of Trump’s most loyal advocate in the Congress. Most of them continue to spread the former president’s false claims of being cheated in the Nov. 2020 election, after they voted against the election results.
It is emphasized in the list that it can be updated any time soon as the committee has been stepping up their investigation, which denotes that additional names could pop up.
After CNN revealed the partial list, a number of Republicans have been reacting negatively to the committee’s latest investigation action. In a statement conveyed via CNN, Marjorie Taylor Greene claimed that the requests are attempts launched by Democrats to smear their reputations and remove them from office including sending to jail the strongest Democratic oppositions. Rep Jim Jordan warned the committee that they request could lead to political retributions.
We are now experiencing progress as a result of railways constructed by our forefathers. Trains and railway companies such as DB (db auskunft) have been providing us means of transportation and enabling economic growth since their beginnings. But despite the good things we are now experiencing, the construction of these important railways had gone through series of controversies.
Read also: The Pros and Cons of Social Media as Part of Social Development
In the 19th and 20th centuries, governments paid close attention to economic development. Fishing has not been shown to create enough wealth and employment to support the continuous growth of the population. The goal was therefore to provide jobs and a better standard of living for the people and to develop other land-based industries that could temporarily or permanently curb the flow of people migrating to the mainland.
Initially, the focus was on agriculture. By building roads and promoting clearing and development, the government thought that families could become economically self-sufficient. They would have plenty to eat and will be less dependent on poor relief, specifically if agriculture was mixed together with fishing and other economic activities. These pursuits were not politically debatable. Before and after the granting of the Responsible Government in the year 1855, all political parties backed the campaign of agriculture by using agricultural association support, seed potato supply, land reclamation insurance premiums, and others.
The 1860 government was specifically excited about agriculture, but also showed interest in developing other sectors of the economy. Therefore, Geological Survey, for example, began operation in 1864 and received great enthusiasm with the discovery of copper deposits in Notre Dame Bay. This involvement in land resources and the anticipation that valuable resources will be found inland has sparked debate over the feasibility of building a railroad throughout the island.
The primary argument for rail construction was related to economic advancement. The construction will not only generate jobs but will also encourage logging, agriculture, and mining by providing access to inland areas and other hard-to-reach areas (where there are no roads). Railroad enthusiasts were also very convinced of the economic opportunity land, considered rich in agricultural land, minerals and forests. Railroad construction became an important part of the platform. Construction began in 1881.
The primary argument for rail construction was related to economic advancement. The construction will not only generate jobs but will also encourage logging, agriculture, and mining by providing access to inland areas and other hard-to-reach areas (where there are no roads). Railroad enthusiasts were also very convinced of the economic opportunity land, considered rich in agricultural land, minerals, and forests. Railroad construction became an important part of the platform. Construction began in 1881.
The controversial railroad issue created new political partitions. Railroad supporters, liberals, and conservatives supported progressive policies. People with different visions of the colony’s future were improbable and overstated. They want the government to focus on fishing and agriculture. Spending huge amounts of money on railroads was a waste of money and that the country could not afford.
This argument was the center of discussion in the political arena in the late 19th century. Regardless of the heated debate on the railroad and progress matter, people took the risk and used common sense at that time, they hoped that the railway would lead to economic diversification and prosperity. It was a risky gamble with mixed economic and political consequences.
Let’s admit it, the mainstream media has been giving politicians who were tall, gorgeous, and fit to many advantages against competitors. In the present times, we have social media, which is apparently the most effective communication platform to ever have. Politicians can post information that has the chance to touch billions of citizens. The approach of social media in the political industry has significantly affected the legislators as well as the voters. At the same time, technology is not perfect. Below are some disadvantages of technology to politicians or politics in general.
Democratic Sen.Joe Manchin of W.Va. is opposing key points of his party’s agenda as he faces pressure from billionaire Charles Koch’s political advocacy group. While Republicans oppose the Democrat’s legislation about voting rights known as “For the People Act,” and the proposed filibuster reform, branding the bills as ambitious and unpopular partisan ploys, Joe Manchin despite being a Democratic Senator plans to side with the Republican Senators.
The political network Koch has is only one of many other groups that has arranged outside efforts just for the sake of countering bills put forward by the Democratic Party. Apparently, the lobbying effort of the Koch’s advocacy group is hitting the nail on the head for the GOP, since Manchin’s decision is not to vote in favor of the two important bills.
In exasperation, President Biden has described the Republicans’ proposed voting restrictions as “un-American” and even “sick. The POTUS on the other hand, praised the “For the People Act, while verbally agreeing that the filibuster must indeed be modified.
The Koch brothers’ main political advocacy group is the Americans for Prosperity Foundation, which even introduced a website called West Virginia Values. The group has been encouraging the people of West Virginia to email Joe Manchin to reject Washington’s partisan agenda and to be “The Voice West Virginia Needs In DC”
The website carries the same list of items that the W.VA senator has vowed to oppose his party; among them includes packing the Supreme Court, the For the People Act, the filibuster’s elimination, the POTUS’ infrastructure plan and the union-friendly PRO Act.
On Election Day, the electoral board has a lot to do. The polling station shall be opened and the ballot shall be held. Shortly before the end of the election, the votes of the postal voters must be placed in the ballot box. At the end of the ballot, the counting of votes begins. The result of the vote count is used to determine the election result. The type of determination depends on whether the election was conducted as a list election or as a person’s choice. Finally, the electoral board has to produce an election record.
As a rule, the electoral board will have to set up a polling station. The works council election is a secret and immediate election.
Where there are several polling stations, it must be ensured that workers are unable to cast their ballots several times. This can be done by associating the electorate to a specific polling station or by handing in ballot papers to be handed over by the electorate at the time of the vote. In the case of the issue of ballot papers, care must be made to ensure that the voter can obtain a replacement in the event of a loss of the polling card.
The electoral board must therefore ensure that the electorate is able to cast their votes unobserved and not comprehensible at a later date when setting up the polling station. It is therefore necessary to set up a polling booth and prepare ballot papers and envelopes in order to prevent a later inference on the person of the voter.
The polling booth must be so spacious that the voter is actually unobserved when voting. In the voting booth, a ballpoint pen (attached to a twine if necessary) is also provided. There are election boards that provide several pens in different colors, so that they cannot later be identified on the ballot papers which ballot paper has been filled by a postal voter. However, a pen provided in the polling booth is sufficient. The color of the pen must of course not be removed again. A pencil, for example, is out of the question.
Irrespective of whether the election is conducted according to the principles of proportional representation (list election) or majority voting (person election), each voter has to go to the polls only one ballot. In order to ensure this, the legislature provides for a certain course of voting at the polling station.
At the polling station there is a table at which the supervisors (members of the electoral board or election assistants) sit. On this table is the ballot box. The voter first collects his election documents, i.e. ballot papers and ballot envelopes. The supervisors first check the identity of the voter. If this is unknown, he must prove his identity by means of an official identity card (e.g. identity card, passport) or by the company card. It also checks whether the person is on the electoral roll. A person who is not on the electoral roll is not allowed to vote or receives any electoral documents. This is not the case even if the electoral list is manifestly flawed in this respect.
The votes shall be counted immediately after the vote. If there is nothing against it, the votes should be counted after the vote.
If the counting of the votes is not to take place until the next day, for example because the vote was also taken at another polling station and the ballot box has to be taken to the main establishment, this must in any case be indicated in the ballot box. The counting of votes may also not begin before the date indicated in the election call. It is necessary to ensure that all interested workers, employers and representatives of the trade union represented in the company can actually inhabit the counting.
If the counting of the votes is to take place at a later date, the ballot box must be sealed in the meantime. This is particularly true if the ballot box is taken from a polling station to the main establishment. The sealing of the ballot box is done by pasting a piece of paper over the insertion slot of the ballot box so that it is completely sealed. The paper must not be dissolved in one piece, but must be so procured or glued so tightly that it must tear when trying to remove it. On paper, the supervisors present at the time of the seal sign.
Final thoughts
A lot can happen on an election day, not to mention your car breaking down in the middle of the road. And thankfully that can easily be resolved with a towing service (http://sanjosetowing.org/). Setting all things aside, practice your right to vote because every vote counts. It’s our way of showing our nationalism and our concern for our country.
Last Feb.19, a resolution to expel Georgia Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene from Congress, was formally introduced by Democratic Rep. Jimmy Gomez (CA). Gomez cited as grounds for expulsion, Greene’s blatant encouragement of violence against the U.S. government, as well as her endorsement of the execution of Nancy Pelosi and other Congressional peers.
The California Representative stated that while the resolution does not benefit him any way, anyone who threatens lives and incites political violence should be expelled. Although only 72 Democratic Representatives have expressed their support to Gomez’s resolution, expulsion of a sitting member of the House, of Representatives, requires ⅔ majority votes.
As can be expected, no Republicans have voiced support for Representative Gomez’s resolution, which clearly shows the great divide between the two leading political parties in Congress. Nothing has changed despite the harrowing experience that all lawmakers went through during the Capitol siege in January 06, 2021.
The backlash against the congresswoman has heightened ever since CNN’s KFile showed that in 2018 to 2019, Greene actively called for the execution of prominent Democratic politicians.
Moreover, she also agrees with conspiracy theories that the occurrence of school shootings in the country was staged, after a video of her emerged, where she is seen harassing one of the students who survived the Parkland school shooting incident in 2018.
In February, the Democratic-led House of Representatives voted to remove the Georgia congresswoman from her membership in the House Education Committee.
Last Friday, Pres. Biden signed executive orders aimed at hastening distributions of food aid particularly to families whose children depend on school meals. Additionally, he also signed orders that wold see to the immediate distribution of pandemic stimulus checks to poor families.
The signing of the E.O.s were made ahead of the negotiations and approval of the $1.9 trillion economic stimulus package the President had previously submitted to Congress.
Biden emphasized that passing of the proposed economic stimulus package is an economic imperative and not merely for the purpose of meeting moral obligations. Brian Deese, the White House’s National Economic Council director mentioned that he would be talking to the legislators in Congress to speed up approval of the new stimulus package.
Among the fresh batch of executive orders signed by the newly elected President is a directive for the Treasury Department to widen the reach for economic assistance; as well as improve existing systems in the delivery of stimulus checks by making online tools available for receiving payments.
Another EO is directed to the Agriculture Department, which aims to raise the aid to families who rely on school meals as provisions for their children’s needs. Moreover, the President wants the Agriculture Department to give a bi-monthly allowance of a hundred dollars to needy families with more than three children.
In stark contrast to how Trump ignored the health crisis posed by the pandemic, Pres.Biden immediately rolled out actions in addressing the threats of COVID-19 with a sense of urgency. That is considering how Trump’s downplay of the health crisis had resulted in the deaths of 400,000 Americans.
In line with the President’s plans to have at least 100 million people vaccinated during his first 100 days in office, the CDC reported last Friday, that so far, the CDC agencies throughout the country have already vaccinated 19.1 million Americans.
Biden builds his campaign by hosting small and socially distanced campaign events, whilst sending populist economic messages in courting all types of voters. Trump’s campaign on the other hand, are built on waging personal attacks and making fun of Biden to amuse his supporters; claiming without any evidence that his Democratic rival would delay the vaccine and “prolong the pandemic.”
Yet even as different polls tell us that Biden is leading, the memories of the 2016 elections still hang in the political air. That is why Democrats cannot rest until after the outcome of the November election; or should they, if ever Trump gets re-elected?
Even if Trump does not have any policies or plans to discuss, nor has taken solid actions in addressing the pandemic other than make promises about a forthcoming vaccine, many of his supporters still come out in droves. While Trump is still making promises about healthcare plans and at the same time dismantling the existing Affordable Care Act that the less privileged found beneficial, we still cannot say for sure that Trump will not be re-elected.
Apparently, the outcome of the November 2020 election will define us as a nation. Either as a group of people with strong political will to change things for the good of all; or as a country where falsehoods, racism, social inequality, despotism and lack of concern for the environment is the prevailing political mandate.
What is there to like about Joe Biden that he will be able to unify a divided country to work together? What is there to like about Trump that will change my mind in voting for Biden? There’s a quick answer to the latter question: Nothing.
Although Biden appeared to be just a bungling old politician prone to committing gaffes and forgetting things during the race for nomination as presidential Democratic candidate, he still won over younger and seemingly wiser contenders. Even if Biden was not my personal choice, one thing I came to like about Joe Biden is that he was able to transform into a competent and formidable opponent in facing Trump.
Apparently, Biden possesses one of the important qualities that make a great leader. That of listening to reason and of heeding reasonable advice, which Trump obviously lacks.
Another thing I came to like about Biden is seeing him lay the ground for unification, starting with his rivals in the contest for Democratic nomination. He has been working with his closest rivals, Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren and Pete Buttigieg in formulating policies that he will present to the nation.
This Democratic presidential candidate carefully mulled over his choice of Vice Presidential candidate in choosing Senator Kamala Harris; despite the latter’s aggressive stance toward him in one of the Democratic debates. He checkmarked Sen. Harris’ qualities as a potential partner who will help him carry out plans for the good of the American people, and not for his personal enrichment.
During the disastrous debate between him and Trump, Biden showed temperament and ability to present himself as an unwavering target of a political bully. Qualities that will make him appear respectable when convening with other world leaders, instead of being the center of jokes like Trump was. Yes, aside from the policies Joe Biden presented, there are a lot of examples of things to like about him.
Last Thursday, Joe Biden unveiled his economic plans if voted as the new U.S. president, giving voters in swing states more reasons to support his election bid. Most of Biden’s agenda were similar to those put forward by other contenders to the Democratic presidential nomination. Rather than be criticized for the similarities, the former Vice President drew praises from his critics.
The similarities should not come as a surprise at all because Biden has been collaborating with former nomination rival Sen. Bernie Sanders. Together, the two formed on appointing members of 6 joint taks forces, which they collectively call as “unity task forces” and has been on the roll since May.
On his part, Sen. Bernie Sanders selflessly supplied a 110-page policy enumerating a wish list of what he hopes that Biden will include in his economic agenda. Ths Vermont senator’s policies Included plans for all American families, such as the universal pre-K and 12-week paid family leave.
A week after Biden revealed his plans, a growing number of survey respondents polled by CNN in the states of Arizona, North Carolina, Florida, Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin indicated favoring Biden. The general consensus today is that many Americans would rather pin their hopes on Biden’s declarations over Trump’s scatterbrained speeches; aimed mostly at discrediting people who oppose his twisted views and thoughtless decisions
Biden delivered his speech in a clear and concise manner, announcing to his safely-distanced audience his plans to “Bring Back America”; not by closing border walls but by harnessing research and development (R&D) and promoting economic nationalism of buying only American-made products.
This comes to a head of creating badly needed jobs aimed at bringing down the highest unemployment rate of 11% wrought by the COVID-19 pandemic. The highlights of Biden’s economic recovery is centered on investments for artificial intelligence and new technologies that can provide not onle solutions to solve the economic crisis; but also in harnessing clean energy to address climate change.
Biden gave a promise that he will work closely with the working class to ensure that
“Every American gets a chance to earn a fair return for work put in, as well as have an equal chance to move and get ahead.”
In order to raise ths $700 billion peojected cost of investments in R&D and advanced technologies, Biden’s sconomic plans include rolling back the corporate tax rate to the previohs 28% before Trump’s administration lowered it down to 21% in 2017.
Moreover, he vowed that the likes of Amazon who dot not pay any taxes will come to an end. As additional measure, he intends to introduce policies that will require the federal government to spend taxpayer money only on American products, since doing so would ensure support for American jobs.
While computer games such as Warcraft, mobile legends, red alert, valorant (valorant rank boosting), and others are trending in the gaming world, many politicians are not happy about it after many mass shootings have surfaced recently.
You can’t just stand by and watch when teenagers and young adults commit serious acts of violence after consuming killer games, said long-forgotten CSU politician Günther Beckstein. That was twelve years ago and seems to come from another world. But for a brief moment, the past few days as though you were back in 2007.
Once again, a politician had made a direct connection between a heinous act and the consumption of video games. “Many of the perpetrators or the potential perpetrators come from the gaming scene,” said Interior Minister Horst Seehofer.
Yes, the perpetrator in Halle deliberately chose a video game aesthetic, spoke in gamer slang, and created abnormal achievement lists, so “achievements”, as they also exist in games. It said, for example, that he wanted to kill people of different religions in the act. However, the medium of play in itself did not drive him to act. It is hideous, right-wing extremist ideology and it’s long-ignored soundboards on the internet do.
The fact that video games are not triggers – or even the reason – for such serious crimes as in Halle has been proven many times. There are numerous studies, particularly in the USA: There is little evidence of a connection between playing violent video games and the actual execution of violent acts, wrote about twelve researchers from the American Psychological Association in 2017 in a joint statement.
And yet in our society, we have to talk more about video games. Not enough is discussed about their content, but enough about certain game communities, the shadow areas around them. Platforms such as Steam have remained unobserved for far too long, and in some areas now offer a breeding ground for hatred, agitation, and right-wing radical ideas. The contributions are often only moderated – on a platform with more than 90 million active users per month. The vast majority of contributions, it cannot be emphasized enough, are harmless.
In addition, there are so-called imageboards such as “4chan” and the now “8chan”, simple forums in which everyone can create posts anonymously. In most cases, harmless images are exchanged here or all sorts of topics are discussed. However, these forums have increasingly deteriorated into a pool for dissatisfied, mostly white, young men, who spread their abstruse worldview undisturbed here – and are receptive to radical-right ideologies, anti-Semitism and hatred of women.
Governors in 5 U.S. States have ordered the millions of people in their jurisdiction to shelter-in-place; choosing life over livelihood on their behalf.
The first to implement the drastic measure in waging the war against the Covid-19 infectious disease was the San Francisco Bay Area, as the number of community-transmitted cases quickly rose to about 350. Apparently alarmed by the projection that as many as 25 million individuals could be hit with the Covid-19 disease In California, Governor Gavin Newsom eventually gave the order to make shelter-in-place restriction mandatory in the entire state.
In less than a day thereafter, Governor Andrew Cuomo of New York, Governor Jay Robert “J. B.” Pritzker of Illinois, Governor Philip Murphy of New Jersey, and Edward “Ned” Lamont Jr, gave the same order in separate announcements. All five governors agree that at the end of the day, the health and well-being of their respective constituents can be best protected, if people are forced by law to stay home. The only time they will be allowed to go out is if they need to buy food or medicine, but will be subject to vetting by local law enforcers.
The World Health Organization (WHO) reported Saturday (March 21, 2020) that the confirmed cases of Covid-19 infection across 168 countries around the globe has reached 234,000, to which 9,840 resulted in fatalities. As of this writing the numbers have once again risen to 284,566 confirmed cases with at least 11,868 deaths.
The U.S. is fast becoming one of the worst-hit countries, as the numbers have quickly climbed to 19,624 confirmed cases and 260 deaths. Mainly because many ignored warnings coming from the WHO, the CDC and later from the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) that the contagion has reached a stage where it can be transmitted by way of close person-to-person encounters and interactions, whether in public or private places.
As many of the American population took light of advisories about distancing from each other by at least 3 meters apart , the numbers of confirmed cases rose rapidly. Not a few of the people with whom the infected had socialized and/or came in close contact with, also tested positive with the novel coronavirus. Cases of infection rose exponentially because for every person that gets infected, it is quite likely that he or she had transmitted the disease to several others in recent physical social interactions.
Death tolls also increase, presumably because health care facilities are swamped, while patients needing medical attention far outnumber the medical staff and crew.
In seeing how the American public still went about their ordinary lives without observing social distancing measures, the head of NIAID, Dr. Anthony Fauci, kept imploring all Americans to limit having contact with others in order to slow the rapid rate with which new cases of Covid-19 infections transpire.
Dr. Fauci warned that
“The worst is yet to happen as the Covid-19 crisis could very well continue into the summer.” “It is how people respond to that challenge, will determine what the ultimate endpoint will be.”
Based on a report released by researchers at the Imperial College London, a computer modeling used in analyzing the current state of the Covid-19 crisis in the U.S., predicted that an estimated 2 million Americans could die if strict social distancing measures will not be enacted.
Political institutions encompass not only parties of political candidates seeking for government positions. They also include advocacy organizations pushing for reforms and activists seeking for equality and justice. Now more than ever, social media can provide the most effective channel in which political institutions can deliver their political communication.
There is no shortage of social media platforms in which to communicate ideas, but if for purposes of delivering political messages, Facebook, Twitter and YouTube have become the frontrunners in the array of choices. Yet Twitter is out of the picture as far as political ads are concerned, as Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey prefers promoting political endorsements that garner organic support.
Facebook, albeit leading as a social media platform, suffers from trust issues; given the data breach scandals particularly the Cambridge Analytica case that revealed how Trump’s digital campaign team manipulated FB user accounts in advancing Trump’s political campaign.
Google’s YouTube therefore has become an important Internet marketing space where political institutions can put forward their political communication. Given YouTube’s current ranking as the next largest search engine on a global scale, and its present count of 2 billion active users, the largest video-sharing social media platform has evolved into becoming a major source of political and social information.
It does not come as a surprise at all, why there was a mad scramble among political campaign teams when Google announced the activation of a new advertising app called “Instant Reserve.” The software gives political institutions, tools that enable them to buy and reserve advertising slots in advance. At the same time, they can customize their political advertisement according to their budget, as well as program them to appear in geolocations where the ads will be most timely and relevant.
In addition, Google and its YouTube platform made certain policy changes that aim to avoid committing Facebook’s political advertising errors in the 2016 presidential elections.
Political adverts appearing in Google and YouTube will have to tailor-fit their advertisement around the age, gender and postcode of their target audience. This denotes that publishers of advertising campaigns can not target voters based on the issues they either support or do not support (e.g. abortion, LGBTQ marriage, marijuana legalization.)
That being the case, uploading personal info data other than the aforementioned demographic factors to target specific sets of audience, is not allowed
Nonetheless, the Google and YouTube platforms will direct political advertisements to users who read and watch content related to specific issues occurring as published content.
The policy updates also address ads and content that aim to mislead voters by insinuating there is voter suppression, or by making unfounded claims that there is a breach in the integrity of the elections. Apparently, this update took into consideration the the slew of fake political news the discouraged millions of voters from going out and exercise their right to vote in the 2016 presidential election.
Last week, the news media stream was full of reports about an alleged intelligence officer blowing the whistle on U.S. president Trump. The complaint contained allegations about Trump’s disturbing conduct in connection with several phone conversations held with a foreign leader.
The Washington Post was the first to carry the whistle-blowing incident, but which to date, still has vague details. As it turned out, the National Intelligence Director to whom the complaint was submitted chose to bring the matter to Trump, instead of bringing it to Congress as required by legal whistle-blowing procedures.
The different major news outlets have pieced together bits and pieces of information on events that led to the whistle-blowing complaint filed by the intelligence officer.
On all points of view, the alleged misconduct is in connection with Trump’s widely publicized action of pressuring the newly-elected president of Ukraine to gather evidence aimed at smearing Joe Biden. That is because former vice-president Biden has been leading polls that suggest he will be the Democratic candidate most likely to face Trump in the 2020 presidential elections.
Who is the whistleblower?
Some are looking to either former Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats, who resigned last July 2019, or to Susan Gordon, the former Principal Deputy Director of National Intelligence, who also resigned a month after.
According to The Times, Coats resigned not only because the Trump administration continued to water down his warnings about Russian activities that pose threats to U.S. national security. The former intelligence director’s greater grievance is that the White House altered certain sections in Coats’ dossier about Russia’s interference in the 2018 midterm elections. The purpose of which was to make certain information stated therein, appear less critical.
Susan Gordon, on the other hand, submitted her handwritten resignation to Trump, on August 2019, which read
“I offer this letter as an act of respect and patriotism, not preference. You should have your team,”
Thereafter, Trump replaced the two intelligence officers with known Trump loyalists, including the new intelligence director who did not submit the whistleblower’s complaint to Congress.
In continuing with the speculations, the question of to whom Trump’s “promise” was made remains a mystery. Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky, a former comedian before he was elected president by majority of the Ukrainians, seems a likely candidate. He is known to have tread cautiously to avoid provoking Trump, lest the latter makes good on his threat to suspend the $250 million military aid that Congress appropriated for Ukraine. The financial aid is meant to help the country ward off Russia’s military might.
Zelensky’s first show of cooperation was when it halted any participation or involvement in Special Counsel Mueller’s investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential elections. This denotes that even before Congress approved the $250 million military aid, the Ukrainian president was already in direct communication with the White House
In August, 2019 it was reported that Trump was delaying the release of the Ukraine military aid. After questions about the slow delivery were raised by both Congressional Republicans and Democrats, Trump finally approved the release in mid-September, a week before the news of the intelligence whistleblower’s complaint blew up.
However, the latest Washington Post update said that according to the whistleblower, there was no mention of military aid during the conversation.
Frankly, unless Congress sheds light to this by way of a hearing, no one knows the exact reasons that moved an intelligence officer to finally blow the whistle on Trump.
Customary of news coming from U.S. president Donald Trump, he is currently spreading information that his approval ratings went up after targeting Congress’ 4 women-of color. The statement is partly true, but that went without clarifying that the approval came mostly from Republican supporters and not from a larger number of voters representing the country.
A new poll by USA Today showed that 57% of Republican voters agree that Trump’s verbal tirade against the four Congresswomen collectively referred to as The Squad, was not racist. However, in the latest CBS poll on an overall scale, 59% of the American voters polled, do not approve of Trump’s racist remarks, leaving 40 % who signified approval.
On a party level, 93% percent of Democrats and 68% percent of those supporting independents, regard Trump’s racist tweets as offensive, while among Republicans, only 37% held the same stance.
The latest party-level polls clearly indicate that there exists a partisan divide. Yet in a country in which the number of non-white population can have a significant impact in the 2020 presidential elections, their force is fast becoming a factor to consider. Racist tweets and “send her back” chants against lawmakers-of -color can surely influence the votes of a large demographic of non-white Americans.
In fact, Republican members who are aware of this, are trying to distance themselves from Trump’s racial slurs. Most of them come from American states in which the majority already consists of the so-called minority groups.
West Texas Republican Representative Will Hurd, the only black Republican in the Lower House and one of four GOP members who sided with House Democrats in condemning Trump’s racist tweets said.
”The tweets were not only racist, but they are also bad politics.”
In stressing the impact of states with large numbers of minority voters, analysis of the July 2018 US census is currently showing projections that in less than a quarter century, white people will eventually make up the minority. The forecast is that around 70% of today’s population will see that happen during their lifetime.
In five American states, namely California, Hawaii, District of Columbia, New Mexico and Texas, the shift from minority-majority has already taken place. According to the projections, the tipping point of the shift to minority-majority across the country, could occur just in time for the 2020 presidential elections. That is because many among the minority groups will turn 18 years old on the said year. As an example, below is the:
The most recent Fox News Poll conducted between June 09 and 12, 2019 involving 1001 randomly selected registered voters, revealed results not favorable to the re-election bid of incumbent president, Donald Trump. Despite being the news agency favored by Trump because it does not publish “fake news,” Fox News published the poll results showing that most responders would choose a Democratic candidate over Donald Trump.
Actually, polls were conducted by Fox News in collaboration with Beacon Research (Democrat) and Shaw Company (Republican), in 3 different occasions: March 17 – 20, 2019; May 11 – 14, 2019 and June 09 -12, 2019. The 3 polls, albeit showing different figures in terms of percentages, produced consistent results that many among the polled voters will lean toward voting for former Vice President Joe Biden.
On the question of who among the 2020 Democratic presidential candidates, respondents would like to see as Trump’s opponent, Joe Biden is in the lead. Biden had a showing of 32% in the June poll, coming from a 35% and 31% results in the May and March polls, respectively.
However, to a question in the June poll that asked interviewees on how they would react if Trump is re-elected, thirty percent (30%) said they would be Scared, while twenty-one percent (21%) would be Enthusiastic . The same question was asked in previous polls conducted in connection with the 2016 presidential elections, in which as many as forty-nine percent (49%) were Scared and only thirteen percent (13%) were Enthusiastic.
On hypothetical 2020 presidential match-ups fielding other top Democratic candidate as Trump’s potential opponent, the June poll results showed the incumbent president losing.
The Senate Judiciary Committee hearing last Wednesday, May 01, 2019 in which US Attorney General William Barr wash harshly grilled by Democratic Senators, provided ample proof that partisan politics continues to prevail over matters that required unbiased judgment.
AG Barr was called on to discuss special counsel Mueller’s Report after he released a redacted copy last April 18, 2018. AG Barr though released a 448-page report in which 11% of the text had been redacted. Nearly 40% of the pages released by AG Barr had at least one redaction, comprising well over 900 redacted text blocks in all. The report was divided into 2 volumes:
VOLUME 1 – Mueller’s report on investigations to which a conclusion was reached that there was Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election won by Donald Trump. Such interference is deemed a violation of U.S. criminal law.
VOLUME 2 – Mueller’s report citing instances in which President Trump made attempts to obstruct justice by trying to control the ongoing investigations and by trying to wield his presidential influence on those who refused to abide with his instructions.
The overall impression that AG Barr gave is that he viewed Mueller’s report as a condensation of false accusations that Donald Trump was part of the group who were coordinating with the supposed Russian interference. A stance for which he received grilling questions coming mostly from Democratic Senators.
On several occasions, AG Barr asserted that Donald Trump was falsely accused,. It was his defense on why he concluded that the Mueller investigation did not provide enough evidence to support that Trump was in collusion with the alleged Russian interference. He believes that obstruction of justice was not present because Trump was merely acting on his constitutional àuthority to supervise groundless and unfounded proceedings.
Barr’s testimony also revealed that partisan politics was at work since several times during the hearing, and whenever AG Barr fumbled with his answers, Panel Chairman Lindsey Graham (Rep-S.C.) came to Barr’s rescue by saying the Attorney General is being slandered.
Democratic Senators Kamala Harris, Elizabeth Warren and Kirsten Gillibrand who are also in the running for president in the 2020 elections, joined other Democrats on calls for AG Barr to resign. The general consensus is that AG William Barr had lied to Congress and therefor not worthy of the trust placed on him as head of the Department of Justice.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (Dem-Ca.) prefers to reserve judgment until after their turn to question AG Barr on Thursday via the House’s Senate Judiciary Committee hearing. Still, Speaker Pelosi opined that after the Senate hearing, AG Barr’s responses and comments do not live up to the standards conforming to an attorney general.
Everyone who have weight issues aims and wishes to lose weight in the quickest most possible way. That’s when the concept of a 2 Week Diet came to the picture, but the real question is… is it really effective?
Basically, people lose weight for a lot of reasons— it could be because of medical issues like obesity or they just wanted to maintain a healthy and fit life. Either way, there is also no denying that losing weight and excess fat is hard— really hard.
However, when the 2 Week Diet concept came, it gave people the chance and hope in pursuing their weight loss program. Today, let us talk more about the 2 Week Diet concept and let’s see if it is really reliable in making one lose weight.
Brian Flatt who is a renowned personal trainer is the founder of the 2 Week Diet concept. He is also a nutritionist who have written several books on the subject of dieting, exercising and weight loss. He is basically the man who wants to reach out to those who have weight issues, he has the heart to help people to keep them in a healthy and active track.
To think, his clients even pay him up to $100 an hour of his service, which makes him really credible in what he does. So if people are still in doubt whether it is a scam or not then they are totally not seeing the whole picture a little bit brighter here.
This is one of the first parts of the whole 2 Week Diet program. It starts with the introduction phase for steroids and its uses. Basically, this is where Brian Flatt talked about the science of weight gain and weight loss, which makes this book more unique because not all weight loss book does that.
Moreover, the guide comes in with the fundamentals and basics of fat, calories and your body’s natural system for combating weight gain. If you are taking the 2 Week Diet program into a whole view, then you definitely need this launch book as your self-orientation to knowing what makes you gain weight and what helps you lose.
Next is you are going to proceed reading with the handbook. This is where things go personal, from the introduction book you then go to a massive call of action, this is where you prepare yourself for the actual process.
The handbook will definitely show you a lot of things related to the process of the 2 Week Diet program. It will show you what you should eat when you should eat it, how you should eat it and they are all conceptualized in a way that it will match your own personal need and circumstance.
Now, this is where the whole process starts. The activity book will consist of your workout routines, programs and how you should do it. It provides you to follow exercises that can be done at home and in the gym. The routines are fun, quick, simple and easy to begin and master with.
This is what makes the 2 Week Diet concept amazing, it makes you think that it makes you easily lose weight but it was actually yourself who is doing that to you. You were the one who helped yourself.
for more information on the same health concerns, you can go to https://grainandgram.com/ for more.
Apparently feeling high on the belief that he has been exonerated from special counsel Mueller’s report of a possible collusion with the Russian government, US president Donald Trump stirs up another controversy. At a rally held in Michigan on last Thursday (March 28, 2019),and in a brief press conference in Mar-a-Lago, in Florida last Friday, Trump reiterated his signature campaign promise of closing the US Border to prevent migrating asylum seekers from coming in.
Trump’s announcement actually came as a threat directed at the Mexican government. He accuses Mexico of not doing anything to stop the unending flow of refugees arriving at the border, coming from Guatemala, El Salvador and Honduras. Naturally, his threat drew negative reactions, more so when he followed up his threat with tweets that he will make good on that threat this week.
If Trump insists on imposing such action, he will do so at the risk of violating immigration laws that forbid anyone to deny protection to people seeking sanctuary in the country, regardless of the manner with which they gained entry. It can be recalled that Trump previously attempted to suppress the entry of a massive number of immigrants arriving at the border by invoking national security rules. However, Judge Jon S. Tigar of the San Francisco District Court placed a restraining order on Trump’s planned action.
Closing the border therefore, and specifically for that purpose is in defiance of immigration laws and of the judge’s order as well.
A senior Trump administration officer explained by way of telephone interview with Dara Lind of Vox, is that what the president had actually meant was to control the flow of people coming in by closing official ports of entry at the border. Although the senior administration officer added that closing of port entries is a last resort, border agents are currently being moved to the border areas to àttend to the refugees apprehended.
Acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney explicitly stated
”we need the people from the ports of entry to go out and patrol in the desert where we don’t have a wall”
As a result, reduced number of border agents manning the ports of entry has already slowed down flow of traffic. Business communities at El Paso are already apprehensive about the long- waits occurring at the ports. San Diego, does not want a repeat of the November 2018 temporary shutdown of the San Ysidro port of entry. Even if the border agents were deployed only for a few hours to respond with force against an organized group of asylum seekers, the temporary closure resulted to the loss of $5.3 million in business revenues.
What Trump wants to happen is to discourage American companies from moving operations to Mexico, using it as leverage for Mexico to act on the asylum seekers making their way to the US border. To Trump, he considers it as the price Mexico has to pay. Yet, he seems to disregard the fact that an estimated $1.5 billion worth of business transpires daily along the US Mexico border, as millions of people legally cross the border as part of their daily routine.
Michael Cohen, the ex Donald Trump personal attorney sentenced to serve three years in prison for pleading guilty to several charges, including lying to Congress, had once again testified in different Congressional Committee hearings.
As a backgrounder, Cohen’s guilty plea was said to be a result of a cooperation deal, entered into with a team of lawyer working with Special Counsel Robert Mueller. The latter, is the former Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigations (2001-2013). He has beeb tasked by Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein to oversee ongoing investigations into accusations about Russia’s pivotal interference in the 2016 presidential elections won by Donald Trump.
Recently, Cohen had spent three consecutive days giving testimonies in support of damning allegations raised by Special Counsel Mueller against Donald Trump.
The first and third were Intelligence Committee hearings held by the Senate and the House, on Tuesday and Wednesday, respectively. The two separate investigations are also delving deeper into Trump’s involvement in certain private dealings (Moscow Trump Tower) with certain Russian officials.
Inasmuch as it was a closed-door hearing, both Republican and Democratic committee members present in the hearings, refused to give specific details on the results of their investigations.
On Wednesday, Cohen testified at the hearing of the House Committee on Oversight and Reform. Unlike the Intelligence Committee hearings, the event last Wednesday was televised nationwide. Millions of Americans heard Cohen’s testimony and had glimpses of documents he presented as evidences against Donald Trump.
Among evidences presented included checks signed by Donald Trump, which the latter denied to have paid as hush-money, and after announcing that he no longer had control over the string of Trump businesses. Cohen also presented email related to a meeting called by Trump, as well as drafts of the statements Cohen was to falsely testify during the House Committee Investigation in 2017.
Other proofs submitted were the overstated financial statements submitted by Donald Trump to suit a business purpose, which were also understated for IRS taxation purposes.
Cohen’s testimonies are largely under scrutiny as violations of lawyer-client relationship, and for his own admissions that he had previously lied to evade payment of large taxes.
In all three Congressional committee hearings, Trump’s Republican allies capitalized on Cohen’s previous lies which he later admitted as such. Democrats on the other hand believe that this time, Cohen is telling the truth. Cohen’s testimonies are mostly a case of his words pitted against Donald Trump’s, whose capability for telling the truth is just as questionable. Yet, according to some Democratic committee members, Cohen is only one of key witnesses they will call on.
Trade rifts with other countries borne by the Trump Tariffs signed by Donald Trump in January 2018, is now taking its toll on U.S. farmers. Wall Street Journal (WSJ) recently reviewed federal data pertaining to the Chapter 12 Bankruptcy Protection extended by US courts to farmer or fisherman families. The results of WSJ’s review revealed that the rate by which US farmers have filed for Chapter 12 Bankruptcy Protection, has soared.
District Courts covering the states of Arkansas, Indiana, Illinois, and Kansas, among others are seeing sharp increases in petitions for bankruptcy protection. The Eight Circuit Court of Appeals shows a swelling of numbers by 96%; the Seventh Circuit garnered twice the number of petitions received when compared to the 2008 figures, while the Tenth Circuit saw a 59% increase from what they had a decade ago.
Initially, the sets of tariff imposed on importation of solar panels and washing machines, and later on steel and aluminum, seemed far from creating adverse impact on the agricultural sector. However, as the exports of foreign trading partners suffered a blow from Trump’s importation tariffs, their nation retaliated by also imposing import tariffs on US products entering their respective territories. Retaliatory actions came not only from China, but from EU member countries, Canada, and Mexico.
Exportation of US homegrown agricultural products like soybeans, coffee, oranges and other produce such as pork, dairy and whiskey, just to name a few, has become less competitive. Retaliatory import tariffs had weakened the trading positions of US agricultural exporters.
The trade rift with China turned into a full-blown Trade War, when Trump announced in July 2018 that all Chinese products and goods purchased by U.S. businesses from China will be meted with 25% importation duties. The value estimated at $50 billion worth, all the more created an impasse. Trump’s move only increased the cost of materials and components used by US manufacturers in assembling or in producing their goods.
Although negotiations are currently underway, US farmers and other affected businesses are not seeing enough income that will allow them to recover from ballooning debts; or even in continuing their operations.
Industrial tank vessel and water tank cleaning has evolved as a means to wash vessels and tanks in a secure and effective method. The old classic means to do those jobs was with man ability. This involved employees entering container distances and performing the cleanup operations. It has significant potential risks for the workforce in addition to taking up a great deal of person hours to finish.
These days, the preferred alternative for cleansing container distances is to get an automatic system that doesn’t involve individuals straight. A variety of methods employing a variety of technologies are developed that today figure out how to maintain the cleaning by employees to a minimal, thus improving security.
The industrial tank cleanup technology which have evolved contain vacuum transport methods, tank cleaning heads and several of pumping options. Vacuum transport methods demand the distant suction of substances via a filtration system to some elimination skip. It’s similar to a giant vacuum cleaner, and really functions on a similar principle, but it might deal with hard materials like sludge, sand, stone, powder and fluids.
Compact, closely manicured water heaters can effectively remove deposits and supply cleanup in enclosed spaces in which it might be hard or dangerous for a person to go into.
They’re also liberally controlled and may be made as expert heads capable to deal with hard tank entrance points.
Pumping options are possibly the easiest and most simple kind of machines involved with industrial tank cleanup. Pumps can be input into a container area along with the liquid or water from the container can then be hauled out. This can be employed before cleaning, or perhaps after cleansing along with tank cleaning heads.
It hasn’t been possible to fully remove the need for immediate human intervention in limited distance cleaning. While automated methods are used as much as you are able, there often comes a stage where deposits will need to be eliminated. In these situations it will become necessary for a trained specialist to put in the restricted space so as to execute the cleanup operation.
Tattoos which we usually find on the majority of folks indicate various meanings. It might mean adore pledges, hatred, bravery, religious dedication, political rhetoric, sorority identification and a number of different meanings which any individual would like to express.
In early times, tattoos turned into a sign of social status in the society, although in many recent times they’re believed to be a artistic penile enhancement. Most tattoo fanatics especially guys like to display their tattoo that’s the reason why they chosen armband tattoos.
The increase of tattoo sector is noticeable. Tattoos are getting increasingly more acceptable to folks of all ages. First timers usually decide to have their very first tattoo in their arms.
Your tattoo, if you want it or not always mention something about you and represent you, which means you’ve got to be somewhat careful in making the best option.
There are tons of tattoo designs which will look good for armband tattoos. It is also possible to attempt to be quite creative by blending different layouts or blending old school tattoo designs together with all the new school designs like naruto tattoos. Possessing a fantastic mix and perfect mixing of those designs will surely look good in your arm.
Your tattoo artist may also be a major help. So ensure you are familiar with your own tattoo artist so you can discuss freely the facts of the style you selected. Their experience and previous experiences are also a large donation to what tattoo style, size and colour will absolutely matches you. Normally the colors which are great would be the colours that contrasted skin.
Home-ownership is something that majority of people all over the world would want to have, where one can make embellish the interior and exterior with their own sense of taste and style. From window treatments, for cheap cellular shades click this site, to the furnishings. Nonetheless, owning a home means more than that. Home proprietors are more involved in both local and national politics than non-owners. This unbalanced involvement can possibly restrain the economy and divide politics further.
Many studies display that home-ownership in high levels can limit mobility, lock people in place, and repress the overall economy. Home proprietors are a crucial factor in the “New Urban Luddism” that constrains the production of housing and the compactness that lies at the foundation of urban innovation and growth of the economy. However, the political influence of property holders or homeowners goes further than local “New Urban Luddism” and politics zoning, spreading national level politics.
Andrew Hall and Jesse Yoder, political scientists at Standford University conducted a study that reveals how home-ownership is a weighty factor in local and national political involvements. Possessing a home changes an individual’s political viewpoint as they strive to look after and safeguard value of their investments as well as their assets. Homeowners are more energetically engaged in politics, and their self-absorbed political posture does not merely keep a tight rein on the capability of cities to construct more and attain greater density, it plays a part to broader political and economic disparity.
Andrew Hall and Jesse Yoder’s study formed and evaluated comprehensive election data both local and national for over 18 million voters in North Carolina and Ohio. These states were chosen since they have remarkably good data for these reasons. The creators of the study cross-referenced this information with statistics on assessment values of homes, home prices and other vital characteristics with regards to housing. They gave emphasis on how becoming a homeowner alters their participation, connection with, and predilection for a political party as well as their standpoints in local and national election concerns or issues.
Online political and social interactions gained notable growth ever since politically charged websites put out “Write for Us General Guest Post” invitations. Technically, political blogs are considered valuable sources of demographic, social and cultural information that brand marketers can use to reach target consumers.
Apparently, market analysts have studied blogs about politics in terms of content and link structure and other technological aspects determined as effective in reaching a broad range of Internet readers.
While political blogs generally cover political news and controversial political issues, market analysts hypothesized that the queries launched are valuable sources of both consumer and political data. The hypothetical premise works by grouping the search queries launched by readers according to political leanings. Such groupings will then indicate the political party influencing the buying behaviors and preferences of the political blog readers.
In U.S. politics, politically-charged blogs are popular vehicles for political commentaries among netizens. While they have been found useful in increasing political deliberation, the related search queries used to reach the blog posts, also reveal the zip codes of the readers submitting such queries. Political blogs albeit controversial in nature, enable marketers to know where to increase or intensify marketing promotions. In order to broaden their reach, they submit political blogs that readers are likely to correlate with as their brand of products.
Traditionally, collecting information is carried out by way of consumer or user panels, interviews of focus groups and survey questionnaires similar to those used for wide-ranging US surveys. The more modern method of collecting valuable consumer information, is now based on search queries, which has been found effective by analysts. That is why guest blogging across websites is now an important SEO vehicle for reaching target audiences.
Political blogs as guest posts are basically content contributions covering political news and deliberations on current political developments; albeit expressed as personal opinions. Studies found US political blogs to be highly polarized between the conservative and liberal partisan groups.
Guest blogs or guest postings therefore are content provided by politically inclined people. The main purpose of which is to increase the visibility of their websites to the search engines of browser platforms. Content submitted as contributions are allowed to include a URL serving as a live backlink. The link can virtually transport guest blog readers to the website of the guest blogger.
The backlinks are important SEO elements as they can increase chances of being selected as the most relevant answers to search engine queries. Mainly because the crawlers or bots had used the backlinks in indexing a website content as potential answers for related queries. The greater the relevance of the information provided by the guest blog, the higher the chances of the website to appear on the top pages of Search Engines Results Pages (SERP).
Politics have always been a part of the automotive industry. In the past, automakers had to be cautious about what they say in order to avoid any political difficulties. Today, automakers are more vocal about their political stance and how it affects their business.
Automotive companies have a significant impact on the industry and the economy. They are responsible for providing the majority of jobs in the automotive industry and even more than that, they are responsible for generating revenue, which is essential for sustaining a healthy economy.
The automotive industry is one of the most important industries in society. It provides employment opportunities, generates revenue, and has an impact on the economy through taxation. The automotive industry also contributes to environmental issues by producing pollutants that affect air quality and climate change.
Automotive companies use their power to influence legislation through lobbying efforts which can have a negative effect on consumers, workers, and even their competitors.
The automotive industry is a huge part of the economy and society. It has been around for over 100 years and has seen many changes. However, one thing that has remained constant is the change in how the automotive industry works.
While politics have affected the automotive industry in a variety of ways, some changes have been more significant than others. For example, during the Second World War, car production was halted so that factories could be used to produce war materials instead. This was a significant change because it led to the rise of American cars and later on Japanese cars as well as changing the way you think about mobility in your society.
One of the most important factors that affect the automotive industry is politics. The automotive industry is highly dependent on government policies, which can make or break it. These policies can be good or bad for the industry. But either way, they are important to know about before making a decision about buying a car.
If you are thinking about buying one of the upcoming cars from Auto Decor Hyderabad and wondering what the future holds for your purchase, it’s important to know how politics will affect your decision.
Government offices lock doors with a locking mechanism that includes a deadlock, hasp, and padlock. This is for security purposes because the door must remain closed until it is unlocked.
An example of this locking mechanism found in government offices is locked doors from the inside. When a key is inserted into the lock on these doors, they require a third person or a Slotenmaker Voorschoten to open them from outside by inserting their key into the locks as well.
The two most common types of lock are the hasp and padlock. In the former case, the hasp is locked to the door; in the latter, it is locked to another fixture in the door or to a chain or rope, due to which it cannot be opened. Locks can be classified into “deadlocks,” “hasp,” or “padlocks,” depending on how they function from a mechanical point of view. A deadlock uses no springs. It relies on locking pins or levers that are forced down by turning handles underneath each other. They cannot move any further before being locked into position with a latch or bolt at either end of the lever or pin. Hasp locks use two bolts stacked vertically and horizontally to hold two handles together as well as keep them. This mechanism also protects thieves as it only opens from inside or outside.
A survey by the U.S.A. Today showed that only about a third were kicked out of all the people asked to leave an office building. The survey also revealed that 78% did so through the automatic lock system.
The U.S. government and other organizations around the world have been adopting various methods to use technology to increase security and productivity in their workplace. That includes implementing automated locking systems which help employees to ensure that their office is secure during working hours and reduce time lost due to leaving for lunch or going home early.
A system can be considered “automatic” when it does not require human intervention or effort to work, such as door locks that open automatically when a person approaches them or doors opening automatically when a person raises a hand to them. To make their devices more efficient, most companies use AI. The AI systems recognize when the door is being opened or if it has been held open after being locked by humans.
The global cleaning industry is massive and there are numerous cleaning companies in the different cleaning niche markets. Under the umbrella of commercial cleaning, there is a market for cleaning services specializing in the cleaning of different government offices and departments. Among the government sectors that these specialized cleaners offer their services to includes:
When it comes to cleaning government offices and departments, clients have different demands. Hence, it is best to hire experienced cleaners who provide these specialized cleaning services. With an experienced reliable cleaner specializing in government offices and departments cleaning, you can be certain that they are trained and that the proper background-checks are carried out for your security as well as peace of mind.
Residential Cleaning – House Cleaning in SydneyProper and regular upkeep of one’s surroundings both inside and outside is essential. But with regards to residential cleaning, not everyone has all the time or the energy to clean and maintain a spotless and organized home, especially if time and energy are consumed by the numerous responsibilities at work and at home. If this is the case, you don’t need to worry and stress about it since you can hire the services of a professional residential cleaner.
When looking for house cleaning in Sydney near your area, cleaning services websites guarantees to provide you with dependable and trusted house cleaners who will most definitely deliver professional and top quality cleaning services. They provide a range of house cleaning services and can even tailor them according to your housekeeping needs, including window cleaning, fridge cleaning, shower screen cleaning, skirting boards cleaning, spring cleaning, and many more.
Whether you require a one-off house cleaning job, an annual spring cleaning task, or a regular housekeeping service, all the expert house cleaners will surely solve and get your cleaning needs done with great competence.
It ensures to clean your home making use of the best and most effective cleaning supplies, equipment and methods. If you aren’t satisfied and happy with the cleaning job they have done, they will gladly clean your home again at no charge as long as you let them know about it within 24 hours.
So, if you are looking for a dependable expert house cleaning in Sydney, do check out Cleaning websites to learn more about them and their services, as well as read what their previous and existing clients have to say about the services they have received from them.
A pack leader tended to be dominant and domineering. Accordingly, dogs were trained and brought up with a hard hand and a loud voice. Today you know that dogs recognize a good pack leader by completely different criteria.
Anyone who can affirm this will not want to subordinate and control their dog with dominance, punishment or oppression. He will patiently guide his dog through his new environment from day one. Calm, relaxed and full of empathy, a good pack leader shows the new dog what life is all about. Yes, he shows it to him instead of ‘ordering’ him to do it. He simply demonstrates it so that the young dog can really understand and imitate it. The pack leader makes the decisions for the group. He always remains focused on the situation and on his own actions.
A dog is meticulous about keeping him close and protecting him from other creatures. To be on the safe side, he even checks other conspecifics himself before allowing the little one to interact with them. In the herd, young animals or weak animals run in the middle, in the protection of the herd, not in front. But hatchlings instinctively don’t stray far from the pack. They know that without the adults they would be lost. Yes, the pack leader is cautious and ready for emergencies. And it is precisely this feeling of belonging and being protected that allows the young dog to calm down and fall asleep contentedly every night.
Pay attention to yourself and the environment, not your dog. Look ahead as you walk, don’t stop because your dog wants to sniff. See dangers before your dog sees them.
Have ideas for your joint activities, act in a goal-oriented and self-confident manner, act with foresight, find positive solutions for your dog, become his role model. Be clear and set structures.
No matter what happens, keep calm. Always keep a clear head and make decisions that are good for your dog, never think about your own comfort.
Show your dog the human world and make life with humans as species-appropriate as possible. Then you are the best pack leader he could ask for. Dogaspet is the best dog blog site where you can find articles on how to train your dogs.
With Brexit being a hot topic in the news, Boris Johnson has been put under fire by the British press. For a politician who is so in the crossfire of criticism, he’s also had to deal with a new roommate for Number 10. His new roommate is a 15-week-old Jack Russell Terrier that Boris Johnson and his girlfriend adopted from a shelter.
Just like humans, animals need a good start in life to be able to reach their full potential. The Prime Minister has always been a passionate supporter of animal welfare and has always believed that animals need a good start in life.
The Brexit drama is a very difficult topic to discuss. There are so many different factors to consider when taking a stance on this issue. It is hard to know how someone will react if you support or are against Brexit. However, many believe that if one adopts a dog with crooked teeth could be a good person. The focus here now is not on the dogs or the shelter where they came from. But it’s all about bringing out the human, compassionate side of everyone.
Read also: Are Images Important In Political Communication
If you first assume that politicians are normal people, there is of course a certain basic probability that one or the other also has a dog. The fact that there is sometimes more behind it can be deduced from the fact that politicians often very consciously make their love of animals public. For example, former US President George W. Bush’s dog, Terrier Barney, had its own page on the White House website. In Germany, Attila, the dog of the Thuringian Prime Minister Bodo Ramelow, has a Twitter account that is mainly maintained by his Italian wife.
“Of course, it’s an exciting idea to comment on the Prime Minister’s work from a dog’s point of view,” says Hamburg political advisor Martin Fuchs. “I found it extremely smart when he commented on political statements and activities. For example, when he complains that his master hasn’t been home for so long. Actually, a criticism of his master, which then shows: The guy works his ass off for Thuringia.”
The whole thing is in a larger context, explains Prof. Trebbe: We know from the development of social media that there is a tendency to disclose private information in order to convey social skills in addition to political skills. According to the motto: “Look here, I’m a person like you, I have a dog and I even get him from the animal shelter.” Of course, you score points with that.
This self-portrayal with a pet goes back centuries. Many kings and emperors had their portraits taken with their dogs. The four-legged darling of the Dutch national hero Prince William of Orange (1533-1584) was even carved in marble after his death: as part of a pompous funerary monument in the New Church in Delft, he rests forever at the feet of his master.
Pug Pompey is said to have even saved Orange’s life once: the prince slept while his enemies approached. Then the attentive “hondje” woke him up so that he could get to safety. Significantly, Oranien was considered an extremely successful propagandist in his own right, who knew how to use the new medium of printed pamphlets for his own purposes.
The image of the dog is not always the same. There’s the cute dog and the big, dangerous one. A few years ago, Russian President Vladimir Putin gave Angela Merkel an unpleasant surprise with his Labrador Koni. Allegedly, he knew nothing of the Chancellor’s fear of dogs. “Dogs also have a macho tradition,” says Trebbe. “You come from the hunt to the human being. The fact that politicians who pride themselves on their masculine qualities adorn themselves with big dogs is intended to underline their strength.”
Incidentally, in the case of Boris Johnson, Trebbe is not sure whether the purchase of Dilyn was really a clever move. “It could also be dangerous, because there’s been a cat called Larry in Downing Street for a long time, and he’s very popular.” He has 323,000 followers on Twitter. ‘Supposedly Larry has been showing up less since Boris Johnson took office. If that were to be confirmed, you could still say at the end: ‘Now he even scared away the nice cat.’
If pets can talk, they can be a living testimony of how their “humans” treat them. The way we nurture and treat our pets, what we provide even in the smallest things like dog beds, for example, shows how we naturally treat other people too. Our pets greatly reflect our personalities. And the same goes for politicians.
Images are one of the essential elements to be able to win elections. Through the image that a candidate projects of himself, he can achieve important results when it comes to achieving the strategic objectives of the political campaign.
Whether in traditional communication or more technological political communication, images can be used to strengthen or give a bad image of the candidate or political party. Good images generate interaction or participation if they turn out to be sufficiently attractive and generate expectations among users and viewers.
Businesses like SupportiveKoala use the image templates library to produce advertising tools ideal for political activities. Through images that you can autogenerate, you can make customizable concert ticket templates perfect for your concert events.
The vast majority of information that is communicated today in politics is non-verbal. Words take a backseat when body language explains who you are. Non-verbal communication is much more visual, more direct, more powerful and immediate, hence images are important in politics.
Political parties and candidates make use of images very lightly. Political coaching and the use of image content must have a specific and prominent chapter within electoral political marketing. In this way, the consultancy or political strategy will be more effective. It will be able to achieve the objectives established in any electoral campaign more quickly.
That is why the selection of images in a political campaign must be very coherent and consistent with what you want to convey. In the institutional protocol, the portrait of a political candidate evidences many of his virtues, qualities or defects through facial expression.
Therefore, taking care of audiovisual communication is essential to offer what is intended to be nothing more than a good image in public opinion. Naturalness in politics finds in images is one of its best allies.
In well-prepared political communication plans, image content is the means that can summarize management and a completed project.
Therein lies its importance to teach how well and necessary to communicate with this political tool. A bad image can ruin great political management. In addition, you must keep in mind not to fall into image egocentrism, it does not benefit you at all.
There are no good or bad images. There are images that strengthen or weaken a person’s image, even more so in politics.
The car that a politician chooses to drive can be a powerful tool in the campaign. It can provide an opportunity to show off their personality or reveal the way they want to be seen.
Politicians use cars as a way of showing who they are, how they see themselves, and what they want people to see. They are also used as a symbol of status and power.
Do you want to drive the same brand of cars that politicians drive? Yes, you can! With Nobull, this is possible. You can choose a wide range of car brands and models just like the brands that your many politicians drive.
Politicians always need to be on their toes and ready to speak their minds. A car is a crucial part of a politician’s life. It is not just a means of transportation but also a symbol of status.
Politicians need cars that are reliable, easy to drive, and safe in case of emergencies. They also need cars that are able to handle heavy traffic and can get them from point A to B without any issues.
The best car brands for politics are Tesla, Mercedes-Benz, BMW, Porsche, Audi, and Jaguar Land Rover.
Politicians want to be seen as forward-thinking and environmentally conscious by the public. When they are spotted driving a Tesla, Mercedes-Benz, BMW, Porsche, Audi, or Jaguar Land Rover in their daily lives it tells people that they’re committed to the environment.
Read also: The lifestyle of a Politician
Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla, spoke with President Trump about a carbon tax and electric vehicles. In Germany, Mercedes-Benz has partnered with Chancellor Angela Merkel to promote her campaign for another term as chancellor. As a result, Mercedes-Benz’s stock has increased and they have seen an increase in sales in their car models. Audi is going to be a big player in the new US tax plan.
In the aftermath of the election, several automakers have become more activist in their politics to promote industry growth and security. In 2017, the President-elect’s position on American manufacturing has been a focal point of many industry groups and companies, some of which have joined together to form a coalition that would oppose Mr Trump’ s plans.
Politicians are all about their image. They want to be seen as a person of the people, someone who has their best interests at heart. And what better way to do so than by driving around in a luxury sports car?
The cars that politicians use say a lot about them. A Mercedes-Benz is for someone who wants to seem classy and sophisticated, whereas an Audi R8 is for someone who wants to seem more like an everyday person. Sometimes, the car that they drive also says something about their political party too.
In India, there are many luxury sports car brands available in the market such as BMW, Audi and Mercedes-Benz which can be used by politicians as well as celebrities.
Irrespective of what your political beliefs are or which spectrum in politics that you fall in, political uncertainty poses a challenge. For a large number of people in America, anxiety and stress in relation to the political environment and the nation’s future are brought about by the transition and changeover of power, and the quick, at times hurried, speed of change.
The Stress in America™ survey by the American Psychological Association (APA) has shown the 77% of individuals in the U.S. state that the future of the nation causes them great stress, and where 68% say the present political climate is a major stressor to them. Stress symptoms could vary from one individual to another, however frequently include an amalgamation of emotional stress like tension, worry and irritably, and physical stress like insomnia, headaches and digestive problems. Fortunately, there are numerous steps to take as well as different ways to reduce and manage anxiety and stress brought about by the political environment and change.
Among the many ways to reduce, relieve and manage stress and anxiety, while at the same time improve psychological health is the use of saunas. Today, infrared saunas are increasingly becoming a popular choice for a lot of good reasons.
The Thera 360 is a portable sauna offering a full spectrum infrared heating panels that comes with Tourmaline gemstones. This propriety technology generates a copious amount of negative ions without being exposed to harmful Electromagnetic Frequencies (EMFs). Negative ions are said to help raise the levels of serotonin in the body and increase oxygen flow towards the brain, boosting and bettering one’s mood and productivity. In addition, studies have found that negative ions play a vital role in alleviating depression as well as other mood disorders. A study at Columbia University in the U.S. discovered that therapy that makes use of negative ions is nearly as effective as taking antidepressants to treat Seasonal Affective Disorder (SAD), otherwise called “winter depression”, without any side effects.
The Thera 360 is completely easy and safe use, and provides similar benefits as a traditional sauna, all of which you can enjoy at home. Among the incredible benefits of this portable infrared sauna that you may experience apart from stress and anxiety relief includes:
Politicians love their workboots. They are the embodiment of their public persona, the symbol of power and prestige. That is why they are often seen wearing them on social media, in interviews, and even during speeches.
People who know what it takes to make a good pair of work boots (delta plus work boots come with a 1 year warranty) will know that they should last long enough to be passed down from generation to generation.
Politicians are now wearing sneakers with fashion
Fashion has always been a big part of politics. For example, the first president to wear an overcoat was Rutherford B. Hayes in 1877, and Ronald Reagan was the first politician to start wearing sneakers with his fashion. Boots are still in. Recently, however, more and more politicians are sporting their sneakers in a fashionably casual manner.
Let’s take a look…
It is impossible to talk about the relationship between sneakers and politics without naming Joschka Fischer. When the German politician took his oath of office as the first Green Minister in the state government of Hesse in 1985, he wore white high-top sneakers from Nike. This was not only a statement against any (dress) rules that had existed in politics for decades but also a symbol of the Greens as a lifestyle party for young, cool, urban people. And at the same time, his choice of shoes was no less controversial for Green voters, since Nike stood for American capitalism, which the Greens actually rejected. But even then, politics and lifestyle were not mutually exclusive.
But it wasn’t always just young, progressive politicians who staged themselves in sneakers. When the Bavarian Minister of the Interior, Günther Beckstein, from the conservative CSU, campaigned in 2007, he was given white and blue Adidas running shoes by his parliamentary group. More than ten years ago, this caused such a stir that it was reported nationwide. However, his attempt to appeal to a younger electorate failed miserably – too intentionally, not authentically enough, especially since the textile symbol of the sneaker was not otherwise associated with any political change.
In the USA, politicians make things smarter with their sneakers: the sneakers on them always carry a political message. Now, in what is probably the most important election campaign in American history, we can observe this very concretely with Kamala Harris, the Democratic vice-presidential candidate. They wear one specific shoe more often than average: classic Chucks.
It may be that she just likes to wear Chucks – like millions of other people. For personal reasons, perhaps because they remind her of her youth. But deeper these shoes also have a message. Chucks are originally basketball shoes, and basketball is a sport traditionally dominated by black athletes. In addition, the brand belongs to the Nike Group, and the latter supports politically committed athletes who oppose conservative tendencies, police violence or systemic racism.
In addition, the shoes that Kamala Harris so often wears are the embodiment of democratic thought. There is hardly anyone who does not like them, they have been picked up and worn by a wide variety of cultures and subcultures, such as the grunge or skate punk scene.
Other Democratic politicians have also repeatedly staged themselves with sneakers. While Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton, and Al Gore were concerned with presenting themselves as agile, sporty, and vital as possible, the former president, Barack Obama also stood for change in this regard. When he appeared in his Adidas Stan Smith sneakers, he was demonstrating to young, urban intellectuals: I’m one of you.
Senator Ed Markey recently did the same (although at 74 he is anything but young): he often posts himself in his Nike sneakers, which have meanwhile been completely worn out – and reaped enthusiastic comments from young sneakerheads.
Cool sneakers are something of a matter of course for democratic politicians today. Senator Elizabeth Warren likes to wear athletic models, and fellow Texan Wendy Davis drew attention when she paired sneakers with a formal suit.
The thin-soled, completely worn-out sneakers that Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez wore constantly during one of her election campaigns even made it into the museum in 2018 as part of the exhibition “Women Empowered: Fashions from the Frontline” at Cornell University in the US state of New York. Sneakers are the new work shoes – and in the USA they also demonstrate a closeness to the people that opponents of the Democrats are happy to deny.
A central promise of the traffic light parties is climate protection: FDP, Greens, and SPD therefore not only want to get out of coal earlier than planned, but also herald the end of combustion engines.
For classification: According to the Federal Motor Transport Authority, only 516,518 pure electric cars are currently registered in Germany, which can be refueled at a total of 49,207 charging stations (November, Federal Network Agency).
This means that in order to achieve the traffic light targets, the number of charging stations would have to increase twentyfold in a good eight years, and the number of registered e-cars would have to increase almost thirtyfold!
The reason: the demand for electric cars is increasing unabated. In November, one-third of the newly registered cars were electric cars. This is a record. From January to October, the number of new e-car registrations doubled from 253,000 in the same period last year to 532,000.
At the same time, the expansion of the charging station is slowly progressing, but for your car needs visit gotu roadside recovery for car services. There were still 40,392 public charging stations at the beginning of the year, but by the beginning of November, it had increased to 49,207, less than 22%.
If the expansion does not proceed quickly, there is a risk of overload and traffic congestion at the charging station during peak hours such as holidays and weekends.
His conclusion: “Without charging infrastructure, Mercedes, Tesla, Co. can make a nice e-car. There is a problem.”
Bratzel will have 1 million units in Germany by 2030. We believe that the goals, not only by the construction of the railways or roads but also by the traffic lights to build a charging station are: Given the current pace of utopia expansion. At least 8,800 charging stations need to be built each month at the traffic light target, and there are currently about 1,000 charging stations.
Recently, the digital world was and not without good reason considered “uncharted territory” in many ways. At the same time, it is true that no innovation in the past decades has had such a direct and diverse impact on the various areas of your life. This has led to such significant changes as digitization. Work, health care and political communication are just a few areas in which this can be clearly observed. Learn how to jailbreak iPhone so you can have an update on the issues in politics.
You require intensive efforts to ensure that not just a few are involved in digital processes. The state must know how to prevent social inequalities on the Internet from increasing further. One approach to this can be the promotion of political digital media literacy. The focus here is on imparting skills to people. In addition, it’s focus is gathering information on the Internet, classifying information, forming an opinion and using this knowledge and positions for one’s own political activities. In other words, it is about the development of “digital literacy”.
Some aspects are particularly relevant for the digital world as well as for the political sphere. For example, it is important to question and evaluate the truthfulness of information and media, to place your own content or to otherwise participate in the design of relevant subject areas. Ultimately, you must take into account that digitization will also change the way people learn. It will also enable new methods and open up previously unknown perspectives.
Digital developments affect core aspects of democratic life that are often criticized. Examples of such are opportunities for participation, transparency, legitimacy and responsiveness. However, the Internet should by no means be seen as a panacea. Rather, different approaches are required in order to shape the interplay between digitization and democracy for the benefit of as many as possible.
In addition to the state regulation of network policy challenges such as data protection, from the point of view of civic education, above all a social accompanying process is indispensable. This particularly revolves around questions of access to the digital political world and the ability to use and shape this sphere individually. And to combine it with that of analog politics.
Digitization is increasingly affecting all areas of society, from politics to business to culture and science. The political dimension of this process is clearly evident today.
The rapid development of digital technologies like reading on kindle vs ipad creates new political conflicts and affects social power relations in a variety of ways. Digitization does not stop at the borders of states. As a global development, it is changing international politics. It is creating new foreign and security policy challenges.
The digitization and digital transformation of entire branches of the economy as well as democracy are of course also a concern for political education and political youth education. Digitization is changing far more than “just” the economy. It is changing the job market, the media and education system, or communication behaviour. Digitization is also changing the political processes and the normative foundations of politics.
In order for a democracy to be able to achieve what makes it stand out from all other forms of government, it needs a free public discourse. Through this discourse, which in a mass society is always conveyed via the mass media, the citizens perceive themselves as parts of the community, as demos.
This discourse helps to clarify again and again what problems and challenges exist in society. Ideally, these topics are then conveyed through the intermediary organizations taken up by the state institutions. The members of a democratic pluralistic state are therefore by no means just passive addressees of the political decision-makers. They help shape the public discourse.
This is exactly where the changes brought about by digital communication come into play. Since public discourse is so important for democracy, it inevitably affects democracy. It affects if the form and content of communication change dramatically in the course of digitization.
As a result, there is also new content for civic education. It has to react, for example, to the loss of importance of the previously influential gatekeepers like journalists and editors. While even politically uninterested people in the old media landscape, it is now easily possible to live completely politically abstinent despite constant media consumption.
Before being able to vote in elections, every voter needs to receive his or her voting certificate in order to avoid harmful voting behavior. Just as one Brexit supporter stated, the vote outcome surprised him. He had no idea his vote would have such far-reaching consequences. The fact that, after a majority had already voted for Brexit, Brexit was the second most Googled search word in the UK. He wielded considerable authority as the leader of the party that tolerated the cabinet and so consistently assisted in gaining a majority, although he was not a minister, and having an exam free iq test instant results may be quite beneficial.
To counteract such occurrences, everyone should collect their ballots as soon as possible. Someone must pass a voting exam in order to do so, demonstrating at the very least that he understands the basic concepts of the democratic system and what voting entails. That may seem self-evident, but as the voter above discovered, this isn’t the case for everyone. Let alone the fact that the ordinary voter is aware of different types of political behavior. What, for example, is fascism? Are people aware of the core characteristics of fascism when they hear that word? The voting exam is not an ideological test, but rather a test of factual fundamental understanding of our political system. A ballot paper is not being offered for the first time. Constitutional law scholars intended to improve political awareness among citizens or political citizenship, in the 1960s by providing voting rights only after finishing a course at a national institute. There was a frenzied dread of one-sidedness, and political knowledge was equated with political or ideological fanaticism.
However, the world has evolved and gotten considerably more complicated in the last fifty years. Globalization, global terror, financial crises, climate change, and the greatest refugee inflow since World War II all impose new expectations on voters, who must vote in this increasingly difficult situation. Shouldn’t we be given additional instruments to develop political understanding, such as a voting course and a voting certificate? The only potential disadvantage of introducing a ballot paper is a further fall in voting turnout. As a result, the credibility of election results will be put under even greater scrutiny. This might be avoided by providing the voting course and exam in secondary schools. After all, this is a topic covered in social studies. There are no longer any punishments for kids who do not pay attention. We feel that obtaining a voting certificate is a perfectly acceptable prerequisite for participation in the democratic process. To avoid risky driving, everyone is required to get a driver’s license before driving a car on the road. The voting certificate exists to prevent harmful voting behavior. After all, the effects of rash voting might have just as far-reaching implications.
Things start to become complex from the time when political structures, philosophical ideologies and economic policies have been developed. If you are confused or need help to further understand how the government works, don’t worry, we got you! In the next paragraphs, you are going to find the most common forms of government followed by several nations today.
This is a type of government that lets people pick their leaders. The main goal of democracy is to practice governance via fair representation and to prevent the abuse of power. The outcome, it creates a system that demands debate, compromise and discourse to be able to satisfy the widest possible public interests.
Democracy is advocating fair and free elections, human rights protection, law and order and civic participation. This is the same reason why many businesses, hotels, restaurants and so forth prefer a democratic form of government than something else as they get a voice as well in the community.
With communism, it is a centralized form of government that is led by one party that is typically authoritarian. This is inspired by a German philosopher, Karl Marx. Nations that follow communism replace profit-based economy and private properties with public ownership as well as communal control of the economic production similar to:
With communism, it makes citizens part of a classless society that is distributing services and goods as needed.
This is a system that is promoting cooperation instead of competition among its citizens.
The citizens then own a mean of production as well as distribution of services and goods while there is a centralized government that oversee the process. Every person is benefiting and contributing to the system as per their abilities and needs.
Say for example that the government is following oligarchy leadership, they normally follow a specific set of qualities similar to heredity, race or even wealth. These are then used in giving power to a small group of people. In most cases, oligarchies have authoritative rulers and the absence of individual rights or democratic practices.
Politics and power within an organization or business just as those hotel bei Schloss Neuschwanstein are somewhat comparable to the traditional government’s political structure. In which we know that the authority is distributed across the different areas of the system in which that power is executed.
Oftentimes, there are other sources of power that is competing for control, which is not actually a bad thing. Unless someone decided to take it the dirty way. The organization’s internal politics on the other hand could be polarized as well since everyone can relate to one side of the story over the other. Sadly, this is regardless of how neutral they try to react. In a nutshell, organizational politics and power in the business can also be a fascinating thing and at the same time, unique, which can bring a huge impact on organizational behavior.
Struggles for power are pretty common in society, not just in the government and business. One individual is shooting something from someone and yet, that person is not willing to give in. As a result, that person might exert their own authority and power to persuade the other party to concede instead.
It is actually a tactic that could work on any given occasion. However, it might make the situation become more of a toxic and combative environment than peaceful and democratic when it fails. In most cases, this happens between employees, coworkers as well as their supervisor and even on management, other departments as well as in boardrooms.
Being able to stay out of the thirst for power is truly a skill that gives you a lot in the business, so long as it is used in protecting yourself. Being able to survive the power struggle is usually the end goal no matter what industry your business is operating.
Still, there is the aftermath that needs to be dealt with when everything settles down and its impact could hit anyone who is too close to it. According to experts, they say that if you like to be involved in a power challenge, then it is imperative to not acknowledge the position of the person in the given argument, rather their feelings.
One of the best decision you can do for your property and home is invest in a pest control program. These programs provide you with routine pest prevention services that will benefit your home in many ways. Listed below are just six of the many benefits of enrolling in a pest control program on your property. If you are looking for pest control professionals with a cheapest rate, contact شركة مكافحة حشرات بجدة.
Pest prevention is often less expensive than cleaning up a pest once it has started. You will be able to save money in the long run by preventing the infestation by enrolling in a pest control program. While you reduce the cost of pest control in your home with pest control practices, you are protecting your house at the same time. Your home is more comfortable and safer while saving you money on pest control.
As a property owner, pest infestation is one of the most uncomfortable things to go through. The best way to keep your chances of contracting a pest to an absolute minimum is through a pest control program. With a pest control program, your pest control service provider creates an environment in your home that is unlikely to attract pests. This gives your home and your entire family peace of mind that insect and rodent pests are unlikely to be a problem.
Pest infestation is unhealthy. Pests such as fleas, ticks, mice, and bed bugs carry numerous diseases. In addition, the living conditions that attract pests are generally unsanitary regardless of the pests themselves. Insect and pests are attracted to damp, dirty, and moldy environments where bacteria and viruses quickly multiply and cause disease. Pest control programs correct unsanitary conditions that attract pests inside a home. Thus, they make the property and home healthier overall and reduce the chances of household members having health problems such as asthma, respiratory infections, or allergies.
When you enroll in a pest control program, you automatically get the pest control services your property needs. So you don’t have to think about making an appointment to keep your property pest-free. Maintenance is scheduled well in advance, so you can plan and make sure you get a commission when you need one.
When you have a pest emergency, you should treat it right away. Nobody wants to live freely indoors with pests like rats or cockroaches. If you have enrolled in a maintenance program, you will receive preferential treatment in an emergency. Your pest control service providers already know about your property. So they know what to do to fix a pest emergency without having to search your property and get your bearings.
Pest control programs not only make the property healthier but also prevent premature wear and tear on your building. When your pest control service performs routine maintenance, it takes care of issues like controlling moisture and the openings around your windows and doors. These problems not only attract pests into your home, but they also prematurely age your home. Moisture that penetrates your home’s walls, floors, and ceilings causes water damage, including mold growth and structural weakness.
Housing and housing policies are often accused of ineffectiveness and too much complexity. No doubt this should be seen as one of the consequences of the intense legislative production to which they have given rise for a good ten years. Rather than deploring what appears at first analysis to be inconsistency on the part of the legislator, we must try to understand the main determinants of this complexity. These come in four dimensions. The first two refer to the economic specificities of housing; the next two to the plurality of policies and their issues.
Housing is first and foremost a private good subject mainly to market mechanisms, you can choose what kind of house you want to choose, you can customize indoor and outdoor. In indoor you can buy some furniture for your room such as a sofa, lamp shades, storage beds, etc. Admittedly, it gives rise to public policies aiming at objectives to which we will come back, but not only are the authors of these policies not the direct actors of the system (with very rare exceptions, neither the State nor the local authorities build or do not directly manage to house), but in addition, if we exclude the social housing sector (which owns just under 5 million out of 34 housing units) and a few institutional investors (now less than 300,000 housing units), these are mainly individuals who operate this market. The result is a system governed by a very strong fragmentation of logic and individual strategies for housing, saving, investing, and transmitting.
The second dimension inherent in the housing sector is its very great inertia. From an economic point of view, housing is a durable good that is not destroyed by its consumption, its lifespan is particularly long. To understand how it works and try to act on it, it is, therefore, necessary to differentiate between stocks (what in the jargon of the sector is called the “park”) and flows (mainly construction, works, sales in the sector). ‘old, household mobility). An important part of public policies aims to act on flows (building, improving, facilitating access to housing, etc.). To measure the real impact, it is, therefore, necessary to relate these flows to stocks. If we know, for example, that the intensity of new housing construction (a little less than 330,000 housing units per year on average over the past 25 years) represents barely 1% of the country’s housing stock each year (34 million units in 2014 ), we can put into perspective the magnitude of the “supply shock” that could generate an increase in production, the main axis of the ELAN bill, which intends to facilitate the release of land and simplifies standards and procedures. The inertia of the system can also be read in terms of the slowness of the processes. It is estimated, for example, that between the decision-making, by a promoter or a social landlord, of the launch of the construction of a building and the handing over of the keys to its first occupants, it takes between three and four years.
The third dimension of the complexity of the sector relates to the diversity of the targets of the policies implemented. The idea that housing and housing policies have the sole aim of ensuring that the population is well housed does not stand up to scrutiny for long. Of course, this issue alone justifies a permanent ministry in charge of this policy, but this register masks others, economic and urban. The social issue of policies refers to the notion of “housing needs”: the “norm” is that everyone must be housed and well housed. As the market does not always succeed, it is necessary to correct the mechanisms. These corrections take two complementary forms but are often compartmentalized. The first seeks, in a very open way, to make possible the residential paths of all households in order to respond to changes in their family composition, their resources, their place of work, and even their aspirations. This is what justifies the support given to social housing, rental investment, homeownership, and, more generally, everything that encourages an abundant, diversified, and financially accessible supply. We are there in the registers of planning and construction. The second form that the social dimension of housing policies takes can be summed up under the label of the “right to housing”, a fundamental right enshrined in article 1 of the law of July 6, 1989. Its implementation, mainly focused on the resolution of the most difficult situations, “poor housing”, is based on individualized procedures, the prevention of evictions, the construction of integration pathways, in short on the register of social work. These two forms of public action around the social issue of housing policies use very different professional cultures and distinct political and administrative support, associating the State with public establishments for inter-municipal cooperation (EPCI) for the first and to departments for the second.
A warning on few fraudulent text messages claim there have been changes to polling places was issued by The Oklahoma State Election Board. A male escort service owns the number from whom the text came.
This kind of incident is not new. In 2018, a period of time prior to the midterms, Monroe County in Michigan warned of texts that falsely claimed that several voters’ absentee ballots remained “outstanding”.
With just over 234 million eligible voters, most Americans have received a couple, and people in swing states or in pivotal voting groups have gotten clobbered with a complete inundation. The info is quite scarce, but political texts weren’t as popular during the last presidential election. A replacement class of tools that leave mass, personalized texting are developed within the last four years that seek to take advantage of gaps in communications and disclosure laws.
Though it is simple to assume the texts are annoying and fairly useless, new research out of the middle for Media Engagement at the University of Texas at Austin paints a far darker and meaningful picture of the trend.
On the day of Florida’s election back in August, residents of the 19th dominion received text messages falsely claiming that Byron Donalds, a Republican candidate for the House of Representatives within the primary, had dropped out of the election. The Donalds campaign placed blame on an opposing Republican, who had employed a conservative political consultant who had been accused of an analogous tactic when he worked on Ted Cruz’s 2016 presidential bid. The study found that while both political sides are using various kinds of peer-to-peer messaging to contact potential voters, the disinformation campaigns that the researchers identified came from right-wing operators, as in Donald’s case.
The reason some contact these tactics are straightforward: Using text messages to broadcast information, whether true or false, is very effective. Political texts get opened anywhere from 70-98% of the time, which is significantly above email open rates or answers to phone calls.
The study showed that political groups actually shall enter into dialogues with users via text, during which responses are chronicled and wont to build a good more data-rich profile of the person. It also recognized that the detection of disinformation messages relies solely on recipients reporting the texts to official channels—and that independent monitoring of the data sent by text is almost impossible.
What initially appears to be one-to-one communication may of course be one-to-many, however. Prominent texting companies like GetThru, Hustle, Opn Sesame, and Rumbleup have created functions that allow campaigns to send vast numbers of texts that appear to be personalized.
ALSO READ: 10 Best Methods for Social Media and Politics
An important nuance of direct messaging is that intimacy and trust in-built. Both the Biden and Trump campaigns have developed apps that arouse access to your contacts, and their goal is to know the networks of users and draw on existing relationships to push information about their candidate. The Biden campaign provides users of their Vote Joe app with a script that they will tweak to text their own contacts, for instance. The result is a network of micro-influencers who can use campaign-created language and priorities to steer friends and families behind closed doors.
The report says that the mix of texting, relational organizing, and data-centric campaigning creates “mass-scaled, highly organized messaging from a source that’s able to leverage established rapport with the intended targets in ways in which are poised to become increasingly invasive.”
Overseas, if this happens in a country like Korea, politicians might even use sites like to send SMS internationally.
Text messages currently exploit a loophole with the Federal commission which implies they don’t need to be sent with typical political disclosures or attached to identity The source of texts is obscured even further when the numbers used to belong to texting companies or subcontractors, instead of the sponsoring party. But this, in step with the report, is often supported by an outdated definition of texting that assumes texts are low-volume and acquire sent between individuals, instead of high volume from companies or organizations.
The good news is that regulation about how political groups can use this type of messaging is anticipated. The bad news is that political groups are already planning for methods around a crackdown by experimenting with push notifications—potentially using Wallet passes, the systems for storing digital assets.
Helmet laws have affected injury and fatality rates and health care costs both for riders and the final public because injured riders use shared health care and insurance resources, and uninsured riders often depend upon public assistance programs to pay their hospital rehabilitative care bills. It is reported that there have been 34 percent increase within the usual average insurance payment on motorcycle injury claims in Michigan since the year 2012 repeal of the state’s helmet law. It also happened on the data from the U.S. Department of Transportation Crash Outcome Data Evaluation System suggest that in three states with universal helmet laws, inpatient charges for patients with brain injury thanks to motorcycle crashes would have increased from $2,325,000 to $4,095,000 if no helmet law had existed. That’s why helmet is important especially the best one, get it here.
Although helmet safety is philosophically hard from an ethical perspective, law-based solutions appear to be less ambiguous. Despite the constant cycle of enactment and repeal in many countries, universal motorcycle helmet laws can become as stable and well-accepted across different states as safety belt laws. The foremost critical step needed to determine and support such legislation is the reinstatement of federal funding incentives that may provide grants and deny federal highway funding to states that refused to enact universal helmet laws. Although the center doesn’t have the authority to act on specific rules because these are powers reserved for the conditions, the centralized can heavily influence state-level legislation through financial “carrots.” Often, this can be the only tactic that the federal can use to influence legislation among the states.Given its overwhelming success with other regulations like a national ordinance, mandatory vaccination requirements, and child safety seat laws, reestablishing federal funding contingencies for universal helmet laws would ensure much higher rates of enactment of comprehensive helmet laws, as witnessed with the passage of the Highway Safety Act (funding) of 1966. It would also serve to support state legislators against powerful motorcycle rights lobbies.
Although it’s impossible to forestall every motorcycle crash, it’s clear that universal helmet laws have a profound impact on individual safety and health care costs absorbed by the motorcyclist and the general public. Like safety belt laws, motorcycle helmet laws aim to form the roads safer for both the motorcycle rider and automobile drivers and lower health care costs and other economic burdens that will rest on the rider, their family, and therefore the state.
The second legal component needed to form helmet laws and helmet use more prevalent may be a universal acceptance (or “stick”) by the courts of the helmet defense in tort cases. Laws for adult people, motorcycle riders should be encouraged to require responsibility for their option to ride without a helmet. Because much of the general public concern regarding a motorcyclist’s failure to wear a helmet stems from public funds being often utilized in the rescue, care, and treatment of injured riders, it is bright. It seems fair that people who value rides without a helmet more highly should be required to settle their own health care and motorcar insurance. Other accident victims and their insurance companies shouldn’t be held liable for injuries that will possibly not have occurred when the driver is wearing helmet.
The helmet protects riders from being barred from litigation, allowing a jury to seek liability for the accident without considering the fact whether the rider was wearing a helmet. However, within the determination of damages, the opposing party is protected against being required to paymore damages to a rider whose injuries were more severe solely because they didn’t wear a helmet. People who oppose helmet laws imply that only the individual is penalized for failing to wear a helmet. If this is often the case, then these individuals should be ordered by the court not to expect others especially the government to pay the bill for the results of that choice, irrespective of the fault within the accident.
Suppose these two steps (the federal legislative “carrot” and a judicial “stick”) are taken to encourage helmet use among motorcyclists. In that case, state legislators are better prepared to resist powerful lobbies and strongly support universal helmet laws with identical success as life belt laws. Despite statistics that have indicated that the bulk of citizens (81 percent) support universal helmet laws, legislatures still have caved fraught from groups like ABATE. The authors of this text predict that with better federal and judicial support, motorcycle-rights lobbyists will now not be as powerful as they need been since the 1970s. Therefore the helmet laws won’t only be more common among the states but will lead to greater compliance by motorcyclists.
