The Evolution of Austin Web Design Amid Global Political Shifts

Austin web design has rapidly evolved, adapting to the growing digital demands of businesses prioritizing a solid online presence. With the support of some Austin hosting solutions, this surge in innovative and user-friendly designs parallels political shifts, where new ideas challenge traditional structures. Just as populism disrupts the political landscape, modern web design in Austin redefines how businesses connect with audiences.

Understanding Populism

Populism is a political strategy that resonates with regular citizens who believe established authorities are disregarding them. It frequently presents a narrative of “the people” versus “the elite” and has experienced a recent comeback worldwide. Populist movements can manifest in various ways, centering on immigration, national autonomy, social disparity, and economic fairness. Despite differing ideologies, they all share a common rejection of the existing situation and a yearning for drastic transformation.

The Role of Austin Web Design in Shaping Modern Digital Strategies

The rise of populism in global politics can be attributed to economic disparity, the perceived failure of traditional political institutions, and the role of social media. Economic inequality has led to frustration, and populist leaders have promised to address grievances. Many people feel that established parties and leaders have become disconnected from everyday life, leading to support for anti-establishment populists.

Social media platforms have given populists a powerful tool to spread their message and mobilize support quickly and effectively.

The Impact on Global Politics

The rise of populism has had significant implications for global politics. Populist leaders in various countries have disrupted the political order, leading to policy shifts and governance changes. For example, Donald Trump’s election in the United States and the United Kingdom’s decision to leave the European Union were influenced by populist sentiments, significantly impacting international relations and policy-making. Populism has also increased political polarization and strained international cooperation on global challenges.

The Future of Populism

The future of populism in global politics is uncertain. It has fundamentally altered the political landscape and will continue to have lasting effects. Whether it leads to more inclusive governance or further polarization will depend on how societies and leaders respond.

The rise of populism is a defining feature of contemporary global politics. Its impact is profound, challenging traditional power structures and reshaping political systems. Understanding this trend is essential for navigating the complexities of the modern world and anticipating the future direction of global governance.

Pres. Biden’s Poor Debate Performance Sparks Concerns Over His Candidacy

President Joe BidenPres. Biden’s performance in last Thursday’s high profile debate with ex-president Trump sparked serious concerns about Biden’s viability as the right candidate in the forthcoming presidential election.

Some current and former Democratic Party lawmakers and other prominent figures have expressed alarm and have raised doubts over Pres. Biden’s mental acuity and capability to serve another 4-year term as President of the United State of America.

Pres. Obama and other Democratic lawmakers Maryland Democratic Representative Jamie Raskin remarked that Biden’s candidacy is a political party matter where differences of point of view have sparked serious and rigorous conversations at every party level. Nevertheless, House Speaker Hakeem Jeffries and key Democratic Party leaders like former Presidents Barack Obama and Bill Clinton have come out with statements in support of President Biden.

Minnesota Governor Tim Waltz is said to have huddled with other Democratic governors and had a post-debate discussion over Biden’s disappointing performance.

Some people who claim to have been briefed about the meeting said not a few state leaders present expressed frustration over the matter. Moreover, Biden’s lack of outreach to a number of governors and their teams was also mentioned.

President Biden Asserts He Can Do the Job

President Joe BIden said this Wednesday that before heading to Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, he will meet with Democratic governors and lawmakers this coming weekend to address their concerns.

The president is also expected to address such concerns with ABC News anchor George Stephanopoulos this coming Friday. in his first post-debate TV interview.

White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre told reporters last Tuesday that they acknowledge that the President did not have a stellar debate performance. Ms. Jean-Pierre is confident that the president can address the concerns well, since he said right after the debate that he knows how to do the job as proven by his track record.

How Yachting Reflects Political Trends

Yachts often symbolize luxury and wealth, but they also offer a unique lens through which to view political and social dynamics. The yachting industry not only impacts local economies; it also mirrors broader political attitudes towards wealth, luxury, and regulation.

The Economic Impact of Yachting

In coastal regions, yachting significantly contributes to the local economy. The construction, maintenance, and staffing of yachts provide jobs and support numerous small businesses. For example, marinas, shipbuilders, and tourism all benefit from a thriving yacht sector. This economic boost can sway local politics, as policymakers often promote or oppose regulations based on how they will impact the yachting industry and associated businesses.

Yachts as Political Statements

Owning a yacht can also be a political statement. For the wealthy, a yacht is a display of power and freedom, an escape from the everyday that also flaunts economic success. Politicians and business leaders often use yachts as meeting places, subtly showcasing their wealth and influence without the need for public declarations. This use of yachts reflects underlying political values and priorities where discretion in wealth is preferred over overt displays.

Regulation and the Environment

Environmental regulations significantly affect yachting. New laws concerning emissions, waste management, and marine protection can lead to costly upgrades and operational changes for yachts. This makes yacht owners and industry stakeholders a powerful lobby group, often pushing back against regulations they view as overly restrictive. Their influence is a vivid example of how wealth and politics intersect to shape environmental policies.

Yachts, Taxation, and Legal Issues

Tax policies also play a crucial role in the yachting world. The choice of a yacht’s registration country can reflect the owner’s stance on taxation, as different countries offer varying levels of tax advantages. This choice can spark political debates about fairness, tax evasion, and the responsibilities of the wealthy. It also highlights the complexity of international laws and how they can be navigated to benefit the elite, often at the expense of broader social needs.

The Cultural Divide

Finally, yachts can symbolize the growing divide between the rich and the poor. As luxury yachts become even more extravagant, they serve as a stark visual representation of wealth inequality. This division can influence political leanings, with people reacting strongly either in envy or in criticism. The presence of yachts in a community can even affect voting patterns, with areas benefiting from the yachting industry often supporting policies that favor the wealthy.

Understanding Elections and Democratic Empowerment

The domain of politics, much like the diverse bouquet of flowers is complex and multifaceted, significantly impacting various aspects of our lives. It is a subject that demands our attention and understanding to comprehend its nuances and implications.

Understanding Political Structures

Understanding the structure of a political system is crucial as it defines the allocation of power and decision-making processes. It is essential to recognize that different political structures, from democratic to autocratic, have advantages and disadvantages. By gaining knowledge about these structures, individuals can effectively navigate the complex political landscape and participate in decision-making processes in an informed manner.

The Role of Political Parties

Citizens need to understand the significance of political parties in shaping political ideologies and policy formulations. Political parties play a crucial role in driving the political discourse and help citizens make informed choices during elections by presenting their vision and agenda. A deeper understanding of the function and role of political parties can empower citizens to participate effectively in the democratic process and hold their representatives accountable.

The Essence of Democracy

Citizens hold the power to shape the direction of their nations through elections, making them a vital aspect of democratic societies.

By offering a clear understanding of the electoral process, citizens can actively engage and participate in the democratic process. 

This participation is vital to ensure that the democratic principles of fairness, justice, and equality are upheld.

Global Perspectives on Politics

Understanding the complex connections among nations is paramount in today’s globalized society. Comprehending the intricacies of the global political landscape is crucial due to the widespread implications of political decisions that go beyond national borders. In international politics, it is essential to recognize the interdependent relationships existing among various nations. This recognition is vital in identifying and tackling the challenges and prospects inherent in this realm.

Politics is an essential aspect of our daily lives, and it goes beyond just being a passive spectator. Understanding the workings of political systems, parties, elections, and global dynamics can give people the knowledge to engage more actively in the democratic process. Informed citizens are the foundation of a thriving society, and as we navigate the complex landscape of politics, we should strive to create a more engaged and participatory world.

The Dynamic Landscape of Politics and How Instagram Followers Affect it

Politics, the art and science of governance, is an intricate and ever-evolving field that shapes the course of nations and societies. In digital connectivity, the impact of technology extends to the politics as well, with discussions about social media and its role in political campaigns, diplomacy, and even the rise of platforms like Famoid Instagram followers, which can influence public perception and engagement with political figures and movements.

The Spectrum of Political Systems

The global political landscape is an art of diversity, ranging from democracies, where power is democratically vested in the hands of the people, to autocracies that centralize power in the hands of a single ruler. 

Between these extremes, numerous variations, such as parliamentary systems and federal structures, exist, each profoundly influencing how a nation is governed and frequently igniting passionate debates and ideological divisions.

Global Foreign Policy

International politics is a complex web of relationships, negotiations, and diplomacy. From bilateral talks to multinational agreements, it covers trade, security, and climate change. Balancing power, forging alliances, and managing conflicts are central to this arena as countries safeguard their interests and shape global affairs.

The Role of Technology in Modern Politics

In recent years, technology has fundamentally transformed politics. Social media platforms are now potent tools for mobilization and information dissemination. However, the prevalence of digital surveillance, cybersecurity threats, and their impact on privacy and national security pose significant challenges. 

Technology’s role in election campaigns, disinformation, and foreign interference has ushered in a new era of political influence and manipulation.

Economics and Politics

Government policies, including taxation, regulation, trade agreements, and fiscal decisions, are key topics in political debates. These policies also significantly impact employment, income distribution, and overall prosperity, making them central concerns for politicians and the public.

The Citizen in Political Engagement

In a democracy type of government, active citizen engagement is essential for a healthy political system, taking various forms such as voting, grassroots activism, and advocating for change. In our world today, global citizenship and the recognition of human rights underscore the significance of civic engagement at local and international levels.

Politics is a multifaceted and dynamic field shaping our world. It involves understanding political systems, diplomacy, technology’s impact, economics, and the importance of active citizens. Navigating this landscape requires vigilance and informed engagement, ultimately fostering a just and equitable society.

Pathways to Victory: Harnessing the Power of Travel to Elevate Your Political Campaign

Politics Campaign Travel

In modern political campaigning, the ability to connect with constituents on a personal level is paramount. While digital platforms have revolutionized communication, the age-old practice of physical travel remains an invaluable tool for politicians seeking to secure victory. The power of travel transcends mere transportation; it serves as a pathway to understanding, empathy, and ultimately, electoral success. In this article, we delve into the significance of travel as a strategic component of political campaigns and explore how it can be harnessed to elevate your candidacy.

  1. Personal Touch and Human Connection

Political campaigns often hinge on the candidate’s ability to establish a genuine and personal connection with voters. Travel provides a unique opportunity for politicians to meet people face-to-face, listen to their concerns, and share their vision directly. Town hall meetings, rallies, and local events are platforms where candidates can engage with constituents, understand their needs, and forge a bond that goes beyond impersonal online interactions. A handshake, a shared moment, or a heartfelt conversation can leave a lasting impression and build trust.

  1. Cultural Insights and Diverse Perspectives

Traveling within your constituency exposes you to the rich tapestry of cultures, backgrounds, and experiences that define the people you aim to represent. By immersing yourself in local customs, traditions, and communities, you gain invaluable insights into the challenges and aspirations of different demographics. These experiences enable you to tailor your policies and messages to resonate with a wider range of constituents, showcasing your commitment to inclusivity and understanding.

  1. Showcasing Authenticity and Commitment

A candidate’s willingness to traverse the lengths and breadths of their territory sends a powerful message: that they are genuinely invested in the well-being of their constituents. Voters appreciate candidates who are willing to put in the effort to meet them on their home turf, reinforcing the notion that you are not just seeking their votes, but are prepared to work tirelessly to represent their interests. This commitment can differentiate you from your opponents and highlight your authenticity as a candidate.

  1. Media Visibility and Storytelling

Traveling offers an array of captivating visuals and stories that the media can amplify. Whether it’s a candidate visiting a local business, participating in a community service project, or engaging in candid conversations with residents, these moments can be shared through traditional media outlets and social media platforms. Compelling storytelling fueled by travel experiences can capture the attention of journalists and voters alike, effectively elevating your campaign’s visibility and influence.

  1. Rallying Supporters and Energizing Volunteers

Campaign travel isn’t limited to candidate-voter interactions; it also energizes supporters and volunteers. By hosting events in different localities, you provide dedicated supporters with opportunities to engage with your campaign firsthand. This galvanizes your base, fosters a sense of camaraderie, and motivates volunteers to redouble their efforts. A well-executed campaign rally, for instance, can serve as a rallying point for your supporters, injecting enthusiasm and momentum into your electoral bid.

Want to read more about politics? Read this article: Empowering Voices: The Art of Writing a Guest Post in the World of Politics

In conclusion, the art of political campaigning embraces a multifaceted approach, and travel remains a vital aspect that should not be overlooked. The power of personal touch, cultural immersion, and media amplification offered by travel can significantly enhance a candidate’s prospects of success. By harnessing the power of travel, you position yourself as a candidate who values direct engagement, respects diversity, and is dedicated to understanding and addressing the needs of your constituents. So, as you embark on your political journey, remember the transformative potential of travel and its ability to pave the way to victory.

 

An Overview of the Significance of Political Blogs as SEO Elements

Online political and social interactions gained notable growth ever since politically charged websites put out “Write for Us General Guest Post” invitations. Technically, political blogs are considered valuable sources of demographic, social and cultural information that brand marketers can use to reach target consumers.

Apparently, market analysts have studied blogs about politics in terms of content and link structure and other technological aspects determined as effective in reaching a broad range of Internet readers.

While political blogs generally cover political news and controversial political issues, market analysts hypothesized that the queries launched are valuable sources of both consumer and  political data. The hypothetical premise works by grouping the search queries launched by readers according to political leanings. Such groupings will then indicate the political party influencing the buying behaviors and preferences of the political blog readers.

In U.S. politics, politically-charged blogs are popular vehicles for political commentaries among netizens. While they have been found useful in increasing political deliberation, the related search queries used to reach the blog posts, also reveal the zip codes of the readers submitting such queries. Political blogs albeit controversial in nature, enable marketers to know where to increase or intensify marketing promotions. In order to broaden their reach, they submit political blogs that readers are likely to correlate with as their brand of products.

Traditionally, collecting information is carried out by way of consumer or user panels, interviews of focus groups and survey questionnaires similar to those used for wide-ranging US surveys. The more modern method of collecting valuable consumer information, is now based on search queries, which has been found effective by analysts. That is why guest blogging across websites is now an important SEO vehicle for reaching target audiences.

What are Guest Blogs and What Makes It Relevant to SEO Strategies?

Political blogs as guest posts are basically content contributions covering political news and deliberations on current political developments; albeit expressed as personal opinions. Studies found US political blogs to be highly polarized between the conservative and liberal partisan groups.

Guest blogs or guest postings therefore are content provided by politically inclined people. The main purpose of which is to increase the visibility of their websites to the search engines of browser platforms. Content submitted as contributions are allowed to include a URL serving as a live backlink. The link can virtually transport guest blog readers to the website of the guest blogger.

The backlinks are important SEO elements as they can increase chances of being selected as the most relevant answers to search engine queries. Mainly because the crawlers or bots had used the backlinks in indexing a website content as potential answers for related queries. The greater the relevance of the information provided by the guest blog, the higher the chances of the website to appear on the top pages of Search Engines Results Pages (SERP).

What Dogs (Can) Say About Politicians

With Brexit being a hot topic in the news, Boris Johnson has been put under fire by the British press. For a politician who is so in the crossfire of criticism, he’s also had to deal with a new roommate for Number 10. His new roommate is a 15-week-old Jack Russell Terrier that Boris Johnson and his girlfriend adopted from a shelter.

Just like humans, animals need a good start in life to be able to reach their full potential. The Prime Minister has always been a passionate supporter of animal welfare and has always believed that animals need a good start in life.

The Brexit drama is a very difficult topic to discuss. There are so many different factors to consider when taking a stance on this issue. It is hard to know how someone will react if you support or are against Brexit. However, many believe that if one adopts a dog with crooked teeth could be a good person. The focus here now is not on the dogs or the shelter where they came from. But it’s all about bringing out the human, compassionate side of everyone.

Read also: Are Images Important In Political Communication

Twitter account for Attila

If you first assume that politicians are normal people, there is of course a certain basic probability that one or the other also has a dog. The fact that there is sometimes more behind it can be deduced from the fact that politicians often very consciously make their love of animals public. For example, former US President George W. Bush’s dog, Terrier Barney, had its own page on the White House website. In Germany, Attila, the dog of the Thuringian Prime Minister Bodo Ramelow, has a Twitter account that is mainly maintained by his Italian wife.

“Of course, it’s an exciting idea to comment on the Prime Minister’s work from a dog’s point of view,” says Hamburg political advisor Martin Fuchs. “I found it extremely smart when he commented on political statements and activities. For example, when he complains that his master hasn’t been home for so long. Actually, a criticism of his master, which then shows: The guy works his ass off for Thuringia.”

Self-portrayal with a pet

The whole thing is in a larger context, explains Prof. Trebbe: We know from the development of social media that there is a tendency to disclose private information in order to convey social skills in addition to political skills. According to the motto: “Look here, I’m a person like you, I have a dog and I even get him from the animal shelter.” Of course, you score points with that.

This self-portrayal with a pet goes back centuries. Many kings and emperors had their portraits taken with their dogs. The four-legged darling of the Dutch national hero Prince William of Orange (1533-1584) was even carved in marble after his death: as part of a pompous funerary monument in the New Church in Delft, he rests forever at the feet of his master.

Pug Pompey is said to have even saved Orange’s life once: the prince slept while his enemies approached. Then the attentive “hondje” woke him up so that he could get to safety. Significantly, Oranien was considered an extremely successful propagandist in his own right, who knew how to use the new medium of printed pamphlets for his own purposes.

Unpleasant surprise at Putin

The image of the dog is not always the same. There’s the cute dog and the big, dangerous one. A few years ago, Russian President Vladimir Putin gave Angela Merkel an unpleasant surprise with his Labrador Koni. Allegedly, he knew nothing of the Chancellor’s fear of dogs. “Dogs also have a macho tradition,” says Trebbe. “You come from the hunt to the human being. The fact that politicians who pride themselves on their masculine qualities adorn themselves with big dogs is intended to underline their strength.”

Incidentally, in the case of Boris Johnson, Trebbe is not sure whether the purchase of Dilyn was really a clever move. “It could also be dangerous, because there’s been a cat called Larry in Downing Street for a long time, and he’s very popular.” He has 323,000 followers on Twitter. ‘Supposedly Larry has been showing up less since Boris Johnson took office. If that were to be confirmed, you could still say at the end: ‘Now he even scared away the nice cat.’

Conclusion: If Pets Can Talk

If pets can talk, they can be a living testimony of how their “humans” treat them. The way we nurture and treat our pets, what we provide even in the smallest things like dog beds, for example, shows how we naturally treat other people too. Our pets greatly reflect our personalities. And the same goes for politicians.

 

Vote? First, Complete The Exam.

Before being able to vote in elections, every voter needs to receive his or her voting certificate in order to avoid harmful voting behavior.  Just as one Brexit supporter stated, the vote outcome surprised him. He had no idea his vote would have such far-reaching consequences. The fact that, after a majority had already voted for Brexit, Brexit was the second most Googled search word in the UK. He wielded considerable authority as the leader of the party that tolerated the cabinet and so consistently assisted in gaining a majority, although he was not a minister, and having an exam free iq test instant results may be quite beneficial.

Factual basic knowledge

To counteract such occurrences, everyone should collect their ballots as soon as possible. Someone must pass a voting exam in order to do so, demonstrating at the very least that he understands the basic concepts of the democratic system and what voting entails. That may seem self-evident, but as the voter above discovered, this isn’t the case for everyone. Let alone the fact that the ordinary voter is aware of different types of political behavior. What, for example, is fascism? Are people aware of the core characteristics of fascism when they hear that word? The voting exam is not an ideological test, but rather a test of factual fundamental understanding of our political system. A ballot paper is not being offered for the first time. Constitutional law scholars intended to improve political awareness among citizens or political citizenship, in the 1960s by providing voting rights only after finishing a course at a national institute. There was a frenzied dread of one-sidedness, and political knowledge was equated with political or ideological fanaticism.

More complex world

However, the world has evolved and gotten considerably more complicated in the last fifty years. Globalization, global terror, financial crises, climate change, and the greatest refugee inflow since World War II all impose new expectations on voters, who must vote in this increasingly difficult situation. Shouldn’t we be given additional instruments to develop political understanding, such as a voting course and a voting certificate? The only potential disadvantage of introducing a ballot paper is a further fall in voting turnout. As a result, the credibility of election results will be put under even greater scrutiny. This might be avoided by providing the voting course and exam in secondary schools. After all, this is a topic covered in social studies. There are no longer any punishments for kids who do not pay attention. We feel that obtaining a voting certificate is a perfectly acceptable prerequisite for participation in the democratic process. To avoid risky driving, everyone is required to get a driver’s license before driving a car on the road. The voting certificate exists to prevent harmful voting behavior. After all, the effects of rash voting might have just as far-reaching implications.

 

The Battle for Power in Government and Business

Politics and power within an organization or business just as those hotel bei Schloss Neuschwanstein are somewhat comparable to the traditional government’s political structure. In which we know that the authority is distributed across the different areas of the system in which that power is executed.

Politics in the Government and in the Business

Oftentimes, there are other sources of power that is competing for control, which is not actually a bad thing. Unless someone decided to take it the dirty way. The organization’s internal politics on the other hand could be polarized as well since everyone can relate to one side of the story over the other. Sadly, this is regardless of how neutral they try to react. In a nutshell, organizational politics and power in the business can also be a fascinating thing and at the same time, unique, which can bring a huge impact on organizational behavior.

The Thirst for Power

Struggles for power are pretty common in society, not just in the government and business. One individual is shooting something from someone and yet, that person is not willing to give in. As a result, that person might exert their own authority and power to persuade the other party to concede instead.

It is actually a tactic that could work on any given occasion. However, it might make the situation become more of a toxic and combative environment than peaceful and democratic when it fails. In most cases, this happens between employees, coworkers as well as their supervisor and even on management, other departments as well as in boardrooms.

Control of Power

Being able to stay out of the thirst for power is truly a skill that gives you a lot in the business, so long as it is used in protecting yourself. Being able to survive the power struggle is usually the end goal no matter what industry your business is operating.

Still, there is the aftermath that needs to be dealt with when everything settles down and its impact could hit anyone who is too close to it. According to experts, they say that if you like to be involved in a power challenge, then it is imperative to not acknowledge the position of the person in the given argument, rather their feelings.

Personal Life of Public Officials

A lot of factors in our lives are not made available to public. However, if one enters into a public life, like deciding to rule and govern a country, a state, or even just a small place, the private life and each factor of it will be made publicly available. It is not as easy as hiring the best painters colorado to cover what should be covered. Your life will be an open book to public and this is already given when entering politics.

First factor can be the public official’s or politician’s health. A public servant whether he like it or not must be transparent when it comes to his or her well-being. It is because people will always love to see their leader in good shape. This will also give the public the assurance that the leader will be able to serve the people all the time and perform his duties in a great manner.

Another factor is the finances. It is essential, ever since, for a public official to be open about his assets and everything. This is to show the public that there is no corruption happening under their leader’s administration. This is one of the biggest issue in the world of politics. Leaders of a state are like treasurers as well. The money or funds allocated for a particular project and those that should be given away to people must go to the said path.

Lastly, even if it is really too personal, a leader’s family life will also be shown to the public. That is why a leader’s principle, dignity, and integrity not just in serving the people will be monitored by the people who trust them. His or her family life matters to many because how a leader handles a family will always be a reflection of how he govern the people.

 

ELECTION DAY

On Election Day, the electoral board has a lot to do. The polling station shall be opened and the ballot shall be held. Shortly before the end of the election, the votes of the postal voters must be placed in the ballot box. At the end of the ballot, the counting of votes begins. The result of the vote count is used to determine the election result. The type of determination depends on whether the election was conducted as a list election or as a person’s choice. Finally, the electoral board has to produce an election record.

Polling station

As a rule, the electoral board will have to set up a polling station. The works council election is a secret and immediate election.

Where there are several polling stations, it must be ensured that workers are unable to cast their ballots several times. This can be done by associating the electorate to a specific polling station or by handing in ballot papers to be handed over by the electorate at the time of the vote. In the case of the issue of ballot papers, care must be made to ensure that the voter can obtain a replacement in the event of a loss of the polling card.

The electoral board must therefore ensure that the electorate is able to cast their votes unobserved and not comprehensible at a later date when setting up the polling station. It is therefore necessary to set up a polling booth and prepare ballot papers and envelopes in order to prevent a later inference on the person of the voter.

The polling booth must be so spacious that the voter is actually unobserved when voting. In the voting booth, a ballpoint pen (attached to a twine if necessary) is also provided. There are election boards that provide several pens in different colors, so that they cannot later be identified on the ballot papers which ballot paper has been filled by a postal voter. However, a pen provided in the polling booth is sufficient. The color of the pen must of course not be removed again. A pencil, for example, is out of the question.

What should be considered in the ballot?

Irrespective of whether the election is conducted according to the principles of proportional representation (list election) or majority voting (person election), each voter has to go to the polls only one ballot. In order to ensure this, the legislature provides for a certain course of voting at the polling station.

At the polling station there is a table at which the supervisors (members of the electoral board or election assistants) sit. On this table is the ballot box. The voter first collects his election documents, i.e. ballot papers and ballot envelopes. The supervisors first check the identity of the voter. If this is unknown, he must prove his identity by means of an official identity card (e.g. identity card, passport) or by the company card. It also checks whether the person is on the electoral roll. A person who is not on the electoral roll is not allowed to vote or receives any electoral documents. This is not the case even if the electoral list is manifestly flawed in this respect.

Who counts the votes when?

The votes shall be counted immediately after the vote. If there is nothing against it, the votes should be counted after the vote.

If the counting of the votes is not to take place until the next day, for example because the vote was also taken at another polling station and the ballot box has to be taken to the main establishment, this must in any case be indicated in the ballot box. The counting of votes may also not begin before the date indicated in the election call. It is necessary to ensure that all interested workers, employers and representatives of the trade union represented in the company can actually inhabit the counting.

If the counting of the votes is to take place at a later date, the ballot box must be sealed in the meantime. This is particularly true if the ballot box is taken from a polling station to the main establishment. The sealing of the ballot box is done by pasting a piece of paper over the insertion slot of the ballot box so that it is completely sealed. The paper must not be dissolved in one piece, but must be so procured or glued so tightly that it must tear when trying to remove it. On paper, the supervisors present at the time of the seal sign.

Final thoughts

A lot can happen on an election day, not to mention your car breaking down in the middle of the road. And thankfully that can easily be resolved with a towing service (http://sanjosetowing.org/). Setting all things aside, practice your right to vote because every vote counts. It’s our way of showing our nationalism and our concern for our country.

Politically, There Seems to Be a Lack of Urgency in the Water Transition

Soon we will be nominating a new House of Representatives. There is plenty to be learned in the field of water, but water gets relatively little attention in most election programs. This should be a challenge for all those involved with the water and water management system. Of course, we, the drinking water companies, are concerned.

Understanding the Lack of Urgency in the Water Transition

The water system, including the drinking water supply, is under pressure from drought, salinization and a growing economy and population. The quality of our drinking water sources is also deteriorating due to pollution from agriculture, industry and households. By analogy with the energy transition, we therefore advocate a water transition, aimed at a climate-robust system that ensures future water availability and water quality. Drinking water companies are faced with major challenges and investments. They must be given more space to tackle and realize them.

The protracted droughts of recent years have sent a clear signal. There is enough water on an annual basis, but regionally there is sometimes too little in dry periods and too much in other periods. A transition is needed of the water system: from water discharge to water management. Water availability must become the guiding principle for the long-term decision-making about spatial planning and water must be better retained in wet periods.

The available sources for our drinking water require better protection and we must reserve space in time for the realization of new sources. More attention is also required for conscious use of water and stimulation of sustainable water-saving techniques and innovations.

Watch the Video Why Water Changes Everything.

 

All governments must give priority to improving the quality of drinking water sources in their water and environmental plans. The House of Representatives previously asked the minister for ambition, direction and priority for the protection of drinking water sources in the 2022-2027 planning period of the Water Framework Directive. This year will show whether enough has been done in the new plans, but the step from plan to action will require constant attention, adjustment and refinement in the coming years.

The water transition requires political urgency, cooperation and broad social consensus. The drinking water sector strongly advocates a follow-up to the Administrative Agreement on Water, which has strongly promoted cooperation between the ‘water parties’,.

Drinking water companies actively contribute to a better design of the water system. They invest in buffers and diversification of sources, contribute to the necessary transition of drinking water use and protect their sources. All in all, new tasks and replacement of underground infrastructure require a significant increase in investment, to around sixty percent in the coming years.

But those investments threaten to become unfeasible. Drinking water companies are finding it increasingly difficult to finance their investments. Drinking water companies are becoming more dependent on external financing, while requirements from financiers are becoming increasingly strict. In December, the House of Representatives called on the minister to do something about this and to better align regulations with financing practices and the challenges of the drinking water sector. Then we can play our part to the full, contribute to the necessary water transition and continue to provide tasty and healthy tap water in the future.

Drought, salinization, and an increasing economy and population are placing pressure on the water infrastructure, especially the drinking water supply. Owing to contamination from agriculture, manufacturing, and households, the quality of our drinking water supplies is declining as well. The water supply must change from water discharge to water management. Companies who have drinking water are finding it more difficult to fund their investments. The House of Representatives demanded that the minister take action.

Water is extremely valuable to humans and it is required on a regular basis, so if the water source is interrupted, you can contact ’emergency water restoration corona ca.’ People are very concerned about the need to limit water usage due to the decrease in water quality. As a result, politics must intervene immediately.

Screens on: Politics on TV

Television was responsible to the party and the people for three functions: information, political and entertainment. In some functions it was interesting and important for the authorities, in others – for the population.

A man without blisters from the telepult

Today – although, of course, he was before, but in small quantities – a previously unthinkable type of personality has appeared who, scary to think, does not watch TV, since such a snob does not even have this “window to the world” even in the house. Let us recall that during the acquisition of the first television sets by the population, grateful neighbors came to the happy owners in droves.

And during the period of widespread television distribution, another problem arose. Often, residents of apartment buildings were outraged by fans of nighttime TV programs, which did not allow their neighbors to fall asleep.

But today another phenomenon has already arisen. Many people don’t just not watch TV. With their quiet protest, they are trying to disconnect from events and not know what is happening in the country.

Today novels and newspapers, television news and television series create such information-virtual reality, in which it would be good to live if it were true.

But today we have post-truth, which creates a wonderful individual world on screens, in the networks, in the speeches of politicians. Post-truth is my own truth, different from someone else’s. The Trump administration has gone even further by introducing the concept of “alternative fact.”

What has the Internet created? He tore the news away from the source, thus any user can turn out to be a source, that is, everyone is his own CNN.

Today we still have to admit that most of the population receives information from television. But if people spend 8 hours a day in front of the screens, then it is quite clear that some of their time is still not on TV. And the younger the social group, the farther it is from the TV. And it’s now impossible to drive her back into the comfortable armchairs of grandparents in front of the TV screen like iptv.

Television, like other screen media, has become an instrument of cognitive warfare. Let us remember that it was television that launched the internal restructuring, pushing aside from the screen “respectable people” who read from a piece of paper, in favor of youth speakers who generate thoughts in front of the amazed audience.

How the broadcast was able to reach everyone at once

Today’s television talk shows have the same instantaneous impact, providing consistency in mass thinking, as the result is born in front of the audience.

People should see and distinguish between good and evil from a single point of view. This also means that they need to be seated at one moment in front of the screen in order to set a unified interpretation of the current reality. The political goals of television are retained today on a smaller scale than they used to be in information broadcasting, since even a simple listing of events sets the information agenda, directly and indirectly hinting the population about what to think about.

Past television worked according to a linear strategy, today there is a search for nonlinear transitions in the mass consciousness. The most interesting thing about this is that it seems to you that your decision is on your own, not dictated from the outside, since everything imposed causes resistance. It is from this point of view that we would like to look at the role of political talk shows.

Game over, the bad one is defeated

Psychologists state that discussions on political talk shows, with all their fury, do not convince anyone to agree with someone else’s opinion, but only strengthen the confidence of each side in their own position. That is, the participants in the discussion disagree even more confident that they are right.

How To Prepare For A Successful Political Debate

The success of a debate stands or falls with preparation. Create a question-and-answer document as the basis for the debate and practice beforehand. Do not shy away from the ‘annoying questions’. You can roughly divide the preparation into four topics:

  • Target groups and message. The purpose of a political debate during election time is mainly to convince the doubting voters of a vote for your party: what does this voter need? In addition, what do you have to offer your regular voters to confirm their vote?
  • Substantive preparation. Prepare yourself substantively for the topics that will be discussed. You will need to gather as much as reliable resources as possible. You can use iCloud unlock service to access various information if you tend to get locked out of iCloud in your smartphone.
  • Opposition investigation. Learn about your opponent’s positions, weaknesses and strengths.
  • Is it a conversation between six party leaders or are they one-on-one debates of 2 minutes each? Is the setting a stage or a market square? Know what to expect and be able to convey a message in the chosen form.

How Do Presidential Candidates Prepare For Debates?

One-on-one voter contact

Depending on the phase in the campaign, every form of voter contact is aimed at obtaining information, convincing (through a vote, donation or commitment) or getting the voter to the polls. We recommend that you record the lines of the conversation you want to have in a script that all campaigners can use. In this way you ensure that everyone conducts the conversations as purposefully as possible. Each conversation is roughly made up of three phases:

  • An introduction (why are you talking to someone, who are you) and a question: do you already know who you are going to vote for? Which topics do you find important in your municipality? The content of the question depends on the phase in the campaign ( see phasing ).
  • A substantive part: an exchange between the voter and your party, questions the voter has.
  • Conclusion: thank a voter for the time and conclude with the question for a commitment: are you going to vote for our party? Can I note your details? Would you like to join as a volunteer?

Finally, make sure that you can easily process that information: for example by giving volunteers a form that they can fill in about the conversation.

Healthy Ways to Use Politics in the Office

What do you assume of when someone say the words “office politics“? Is it all about “talking about people behind their backs,” giving negative or untrue rumors, and “sucking up” to the correct people? If so, you’ll probably prefer to stay as far away from it as you can!

But, like it or not it, office politics are a matter of life in any business. And it is probable to enhance yourself and your cause without jeopardizing your values or those of your company, regardless of its nature like construction factoring rates.

Making “good” politics lets you to promote your team’s concerns sincerely and properly. And, being aware of the “bad” politics around you allows you to bypass needless struggles while others take benefit from them.

In this article, we will see why workplace politics are still rampant, and look at seven ways to “win” at office politics without sinking to the lowest standards of behavior.

1. Examine the Organization Chart

Office politics often surround the regular organizational construction. So, sit back and witness for a while, and then outline the executive power and authority in your business, aside from people’s rank or job title.

To achieve this, ask yourself questions like, “Who are the real influencers?,” “Who has power but does not to apply it?,” “Who is respected?,” “Who champions or guides others?,” and “Who is the brains at the back the business?”

2. Read the Informal Network

Once you know where the strength and authority lie, it’s time to check people’s communications and connections to know the natural or social networks.

Listen closely (but discreetly and politely) to obtain out who gets along with who, and who sees it more hard to interact with others.

3. Establish Connections

Now that you know how current relationships work, you can begin to create your personal social network.

Look above your instant team, and intersect the social hierarchy in all directions – co-workers, managers and administrators. Don’t be worried of politically influential people. Rather, get to know them, and build high-quality connections that bypass hollow praise.

Trump keeps talking about “illegal voting”

U.S. President Donald Trump again accused ‘illegal votes’ of being counted after the presidential election on Tuesday. He said from the outset that only “legal voting” should be considered as a result. In a statement, Trump said, “But we ran into opposition from the Democrats for this reason.”

This has to do with the integrity of the entire election process. The President has again announced that all legal means will be used. He told the American people, “I will never fight for you and my country.” After Election Night, Trump repeatedly accused election fraud without citing evidence.

“This election is not over,” said Matt Morgan, legal director of the Trump Campaign. Biden’s forecasts of election win in Arizona, Georgia, Nevada, and Pennsylvania are determined by results. Not complete. “After the election, President Trump will be reelected,” Morgan added.

Senator Romney criticizes Trump for fraud

Republican Senator Mitt Romney seriously condemned the US President Donald Trump’s fraud charges in US elections. The president’s internal party critic Romney declared Friday that Trump had the right to take legal action. But when the president said the election was fake, flawed, or stolen, the president was wrong. This damages freedom around the world. “Trump is undermining the institutions that form the basis of the republic and creating dangerous anger.

Republican Senator Ben Sasse urged Twitter to ignore the “overheated investigation” and believe in the rule of law, waiting for votes to be counted.

Republican Trump lagged behind Democratic contender Joe Biden in the elections but condemned fraud. Trump did not provide evidence to support his claim.

Biden clearly leads the US presidential election

Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden led the vote in four of the five US states. According to official information, he took the lead in Pennsylvania for the first time on Friday. When these trends merge, Biden could take the place of President Donald Trump at the White House.

If Biden wins in Pennsylvania, he will have a majority of 270. There, former Vice President Barack Obama led the current Republican Donald Trump with 5587 votes, with a turnout of over 95%. That means it’s 49.4% higher than Trump’s 49.3%.

In Georgia, Biden leads by a narrow margin, according to previous statistics, and still holds around 1,100 votes. In both western states, Nevada and Arizona, the lead is over 11,000 and turnout is over 47,000. In Arizona, the AP reported Biden’s victory on election night. Other media are still cautious.

In another pending state, North Carolina, Trump is currently leading with more than 76,000 votes (95%) according to preliminary statistics. Alaska still has no results and is considered a safe country for Republicans.

Note: It had not been allowed to wear political t-shirts or any other items that are politically related during the voting process. So, therefore, for those items printed via heat press (see reviews on heat press machines, my review here), you may as well use it after the election proper.

Attractiveness of A Politician: An Advantage

Politics is a very complicated topic. Not everyone is interested, and not everyone has the same opinions and perceptions. From determining who should be elected, to electing who you think will serve the public better, to knowing the result of the votes of the state.

People, especially the young ones, are not that conscious when it comes to selecting who should be in the position. If you are going to ask them, answers will surely be full of pretensions. They will give you technical answers and talk about the platforms the politicians mentioned during the campaign. They might also mention how nice they think the politician will be if he or she will be elected. But they will never ever mention that they voted for this particular person because of the physical appearance.

Some studies have shown that unconsciously, people really vote for a candidate with a nicer physical appearance. They are attracted with the overall charisma of a candidate and not totally disregard, but forget the actual things to be taken into account in determining who to vote or elect.

With this, politicians should not just focus on taking care of the people, but also consider what their people think of them, how they look at them, and what kind of physical image they see. If there are two politicians who are competent for the position, but the other one’s physical appearance is not as good as his or her competitor, chances are, the competent politician with a glowing skin will win the election. So if one is planning to run and be a candidate for a certain public position, skin care like acne scar removal will really be a big help. This is not a requirement, however if you are really into serving the public, and you believe you have the cleanest and clearest intentions, might as well do everything and enhance your physical image for a total package.

 

Will Higher Salary Get Us Better Politicians?

Trump portrait in a bicycle basket

After months of deliberating, a commission tasked with recommending salary adjustments for state lawmakers and executive branch personnel met for the last period on Nov. 15 and didn’t imply increases. The wages of New York state legislators may remain unchanged according to the 2015 legislation that created a procedure increases before the commission meets again in another four decades, and has stayed the same as 1999.

Associates of the Senate and Assembly and governor Andrew Cuomo could reevaluate their decision to depart up increases and pass reimbursement reform.

Some of the chief arguments made in support of increasing lawmaker wages are that a greater salary could “bring the best possible people to pursue the situation,” because “gloomy wages will eventually discourage qualified individuals from pursuing these workplaces,” as Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie wrote in a letter delivered to the commission Oct. 5.

Although the notion that politicians’ cover is required to attract candidates might be unpleasant to the general public, Heastie isn’t alone.

Some authorities reform advocates, professors, and, obviously, Heastie’s appointee to the commission, Roman Hedges, have contended that better cover creates improved competition amongst candidates, resulting in more choices for voters, as well as Hedges place it, could bring “the best people available” and produce a “more specialist Legislature.”

However, is that accurate? The entire body of the study has produced results that were mixed, although the promise is generally supported by the findings. Most studies have revealed that higher salaries do lead to improved political competition and bring educated applicants (more college diploma holders). The most study demonstrates that speed is increased by pay.

Some research demonstrates that higher wages enhance lawmakers’ performance in the workplace (as quantified by the number of invoices filed and accepted), but some have discovered that lawmakers with greater wages spend less time on legislative actions.

New York State lawmakers make a base salary of $ for what is a part-time occupation. Lawmakers may nevertheless hold labor elsewhere and make outside income (and nearly half do), and many lawmakers make an extra $9,000-$41,500 annually from governmental stipends, or lulus, and get per diems for travel to Albany.

Though they have not had an increase in 17 decades and the occupation is part-time, New York lawmakers continue to be the third-highest paid in the country, behind only California ($100,113 annually) and Pennsylvania ($85,339). With a few, such as New Hampshire, paying its lawmakers just $100 annually so as to keep a citizen legislature say legislatures meet and the way they operate differ from country to state.

 

ALSO READ: Trump Approval Ratings from Fellow GOP, Not a Sound Basis for Predicting Outcomes of 2020 Elections

 

Had New York state lawmakers’ wages kept up with inflation, legislators would make about $. The median family income in New York is $58,687. New York City Council members voted themselves raises, to raise the base salary but they prohibited outside earnings and lulus, and therefore are subject to a max of two conditions. There are no term limits in the state Legislature, which can be “in session” from January to June annually.

Peverill Squire has a body of study measuring the effect of salaries on state lawmakers. In general, Squire has discovered that more chairs go bankrupt when deductions cover is reduced (giving voters fewer decisions); greater pay permits lawmakers to invest more time in their legislative responsibilities, and greater wages are somewhat more likely to entice lawmakers who hold college degrees. By way of instance, 88 percent of California state lawmakers, who make $ have college degrees, while only 49% of New Hampshire state lawmakers, who make $100 have graduated from school.

Squire sent testimony into the New York State settlement commission, each the petition of the commission, representing a few of the findings analyzing the effect of wages. More professionalized legislatures (significance legislatures that meet more and provide lawmakers with higher wages and more employees) pass a larger proportion of invoices overall and reevaluate more invoices per legislative day.

Squire also noted that turnover declined as wages levels grow (the ramifications of which are problematic), which lawmakers at legislatures with a greater level of professionalization “have more contact with their components” and “are more attentive to their issues.”

Some professors and policy experts caution against believing in wages as a panacea for the dysfunction of Albany. New York lawmakers are among state legislatures yet that has deterred corruption nor led to a legislature that is usable.

The state Legislature is “more transactional than they have ever been,” explained E.J. McMahon, study director of the Empire Center, a conservative think tank that studies the country market and public policy. “At this stage, by historic standards for certain, the authorities and the state Legislature, given their duties, aren’t paid enough…however, the Legislature stands out for just how bad a job it will in several ways,” McMahon said.

“They present tens of thousands and tens of thousands of invoices, do very little in the way of authentic deliberation,” McMahon added, highlighting frustrations increased in answers to some public opinion survey posted on the payment commission’s site. “They are as bad as they have ever been waiting until the final minute to sheepishly go together and rubber stamps something which governmental leaders have cut a deal on” together with the governor, McMahon said.

While we could ask where to buy Manifestation Magic to help us attract better politicians, fixing elected officials’ compensation amounts is a problem for a lot of reasons because lawmakers have to prompt their increase in some manner, which is an unfavorable move. And in New York, legislators residing in and around New York City have a cost of living than many others.

“I believe we must pay individuals commensurate with our expectations of these,” said Gerald Benjamin, professor of political science and director of the Benjamin Center in SUNY New Paltz, who served on a payment commission in Ulster County. Benjamin would like state lawmakers to perform “fulltime work for fulltime cover,” based on what’s required to “live fairly as a household person in New York.”

Yet since that required amount would vary in various regions of the country,” and reimbursement has to be equivalent due to the character of this endeavor,” compensation will be skewed toward the higher end, and wages should “be corrected formulaically following a foundation is based…Pay should be targeted to start up the option to function to a wide spectrum of New Yorkers,” Benjamin said.

Benjamin’s proposal calls attention to the problem of adjusting the salaries of elected officials according to a single dimension independently, which is exactly what led Italian economists Stefano Gagliarducci and Tommaso Nannicini to analyze the association between the cover and the standard of Italian mayors since the commission of mayors in Italy depends upon population size. Much like New York state lawmakers mayors can make income. Gagliarducci and Nannicini discovered that higher salaries brought more educated applicants (as measured from the number of years spent in college).

Another study analyzed whether higher salaries improve lawmakers’ performance in the workplace, boost competition for the workplace, and bring “high-quality applicants” among municipal councilors in Brazil following a constitutional amendment introduced caps in their salaries based on population size, leading to certain legislators getting higher pay than others.

Frederico Finan and economists Claudio Ferraz examined the history of everybody who ran in the past year the change monitored exactly what the candidates did, and took effect while in office. They discovered that higher salary increased political competition by bringing more candidates (although it also improved reelection rates among incumbent candidates), also brought more educated legislators with much more expertise, although this effect was small. Much like New York state lawmakers, a councilor in Brazil’s part isn’t a place, and the vast majority of councilors possess a function.

Furthermore, Finan and Ferraz discovered that politicians’ performance enhanced as measured by the number of invoices filed the number of invoices and by legislators which they consider may be due to the incentive to be reelected.

Not all study points to an identical conclusion. In 2014, Columbia Business School economist Raymond Fisman and many others examined the effect of salary on the educational history of members of the European Parliament, along with the operation of these MEPs while in office (as regulation had only been released that equalized MEPs’ wages, which had formerly differed significantly) and discovered that increased wages actually diminished the number of MEPs who arrived from highly-ranked universities.

Much like Ferraz and Finan, nevertheless, Fisman also discovered that higher wages also increased the number of incumbents who ran for reelection, which greater wages did “induce more governmental rivalry.”

Significantly, Fisman’s study found that MEPs whose cover increased didn’t become more effective concerning their attendance at legislative sessions or their legislative outcome (like the number of reports ready, composed declarations, motions for resolutions, etc.). The researchers reasoned that in this example, “financial incentives don’t have any discernible effect on politicians’ attempt, which appears more affected by non-pecuniary motives.”

 

ALSO READ: The Effects of Social Media in Politics

 

Fisman considers this might perhaps be caused by extrinsic rewards (more cash) overriding the inherent ones (a private calling to signify people). Though most academic studies have discovered that higher cover does really increase political rivalry by prompting more candidates to run for office, Fisman’s findings imply that higher pay might not automatically lead to “greater” agents, although the further cash does bring some candidates who might not have otherwise run for office.

“There’s a connection between higher pay and causing more people to conduct,” stated Fritz Schwarz, Jr., chief counsel at the Brennan Center for Justice and seat of New York City’s 2015 quadrennial advisory commission, that was known as to assess the wages of the town’s elected officials and headed to pay increases for City Council members, the Mayor, along with other places. “However, I think that it’s not a one-time relationship,” Schwarz said. “There are great men and women that opt to run together with the very low cover, and not everyone who’s forced to operate together with the high pay will be Alexander Hamilton or James Madison.”

Another 2014 research, one that analyzed the wages of state legislators and governors across the USA within the past 60 decades, discovered that politicians in nations with higher salaries “spend more time on fund-raising and on constituent services, however no longer time on legislative actions.” Professors Elizabeth Lyons in Mitchell Hoffman at the University of Toronto and the University of California warning that their findings call into question the claim that the standard of state authorities will enhance. However, their analysis did find that wages are correlated with gains invalidity that is political, although the effect was small.

Many studies find that cover attracts candidates with years of schooling and does lead to elections, which can be fantastic for Republicans. While alone doesn’t necessarily enhance the operation of politicians in office, that is tricky to specify, even though it will give them a much greater incentive.

New York state lawmakers are currently earning less than points in 1999, because of their last increase. State lawmakers in California and Pennsylvania, the 2 nations which pay their legislators greater than New York, often see their wages increased incrementally annually — Pennsylvania’s are pegged to a cost of living adjustment and at California, a commission meets annually to correct legislator wages.

Whether lawmakers should be given a raise, the question becomes entangled by questions: if they are in a position to make an income that is, or if the position is contemplated? Should members that do not hold leadership positions get stipends? Should pay be based on how lawmakers are?

Differences of opinion on those questions caused the failure to perform the 1 thing of the state reimbursement commission.

Government reform advocates, professors, as well as some members of this commission were generally in agreement that New York state lawmakers should be compensated a little more, in spite of the fact that they’re currently the third-highest paid lawmakers in the country and Albany is still quite dysfunctional. Governor Andrew Cuomo and his appointees to the reparation commission are, in actuality, demanding different reforms into the position, such as limitations on outside income, in exchange for a salary growth — some legislative leaders have balked in and predicted inappropriate given the responsibilities of this commission.

“I feel a lot of legislators in both houses, in both parties, are extremely frustrated with how things operate, and the cover is a varying portion of the frustration for a number of these,” said McMahon. “However, the majority of them aren’t likely to become any less frustrated – they will just be compensated more and equally as frustrated. They see how badly the system functions and they’d love to alter it, however, they can not work out the way to do it.”

Politicians Say Computer Games Are The Problem, Is It?

While computer games such as Warcraft, mobile legends, red alert, valorant (valorant rank boosting), and others are trending in the gaming world, many politicians are not happy about it after many mass shootings have surfaced recently.

You can’t just stand by and watch when teenagers and young adults commit serious acts of violence after consuming killer games, said long-forgotten CSU politician Günther Beckstein. That was twelve years ago and seems to come from another world. But for a brief moment, the past few days as though you were back in 2007.

Once again, a politician had made a direct connection between a heinous act and the consumption of video games. “Many of the perpetrators or the potential perpetrators come from the gaming scene,” said Interior Minister Horst Seehofer.

Stop Blaming Violent Video Games For Mass Shootings

Yes, the perpetrator in Halle deliberately chose a video game aesthetic, spoke in gamer slang, and created abnormal achievement lists, so “achievements”, as they also exist in games. It said, for example, that he wanted to kill people of different religions in the act. However, the medium of play in itself did not drive him to act. It is hideous, right-wing extremist ideology and it’s long-ignored soundboards on the internet do.

The fact that video games are not triggers – or even the reason – for such serious crimes as in Halle has been proven many times. There are numerous studies, particularly in the USA: There is little evidence of a connection between playing violent video games and the actual execution of violent acts, wrote about twelve researchers from the American Psychological Association in 2017 in a joint statement.

And yet in our society, we have to talk more about video games. Not enough is discussed about their content, but enough about certain game communities, the shadow areas around them. Platforms such as Steam have remained unobserved for far too long, and in some areas now offer a breeding ground for hatred, agitation, and right-wing radical ideas. The contributions are often only moderated – on a platform with more than 90 million active users per month. The vast majority of contributions, it cannot be emphasized enough, are harmless.

In addition, there are so-called imageboards such as “4chan” and the now “8chan”, simple forums in which everyone can create posts anonymously. In most cases, harmless images are exchanged here or all sorts of topics are discussed. However, these forums have increasingly deteriorated into a pool for dissatisfied, mostly white, young men, who spread their abstruse worldview undisturbed here – and are receptive to radical-right ideologies, anti-Semitism and hatred of women.

People, Healthcare, and Politics

 

There’s logic or not any exculpation why individuals don’t have any accessibility to medical attention in the United States stay uninsured. Politicians on either side of the aisle have failed to obtain some plausible answer to the maximum sizably voluminous collapse of the American Regime and into the American method of life.

Two choices were introduced: regime management of the healthcare system  that wants a plethora of emotionally conceived and thought, or a private-sector Medical Care program whose responsibility remains more involved by its own shareholders. What we have today is that a split between private business control which is available for people who are able to afford i,  along with a public health care program for many others who can not or what they call Medicaid.

Albeit everyone concurs that shift is required, there are lots of differing views on which of both of these culls would resolve it. People genuinely want  knowledgeable incipient methods of analyzing this quandary and suggest choices that are innovative to come together and possibly rethink the medical arrangement.

Component of this quandary is that the pharmaceutical firms are companies. Their liability is to their stockholders not the people. They’re in business to make as much profit as they can. Their liability stays with their investors. This is a part of resolving the Health Care Crisis of the quandary.

Kids, the future of the society, go uninsured around the nation. Folks are coerced to audience the emergency rooms because they do not possess the policy or the money to visit medicos, although the Medicaid system is coerced to consume these prices at taxpayers’ expense.

The Republican Administration enacts legislation to obviate individuals from accessing drugs from frugal sources such as Canada which they assert is for the sake of the American people. They conclude that drugs have never been demonstrated to be secure for US consumption. His government and the President, acting as the United States’ sentinel, will do everything or so the propaganda moves, to maintain the people safe.

The politicians go on . The republicans would place a strategy on the care program and also prop up American firms while faking to require Americans to pay charges. Even the democrats, incipiently chosen to restrain the two senate and House, are still so tepid and cluttered about healthcare reform they supply no concrete direction to rely to negotiate a plausible re-haul of the healthcare system.

Healthcare systems, even in other countries, are not as accessible as purchasing a perfect juicer from Juiceland UK. It surely requires a lot of fund and honesty of the people creating and handling it. However,  not every nation is transparent, people will remain blind and unaware of their rights and benefits as constituents of a nation, especially when it comes to a very important matter like healthcare.

Why Hunting Must be Legal?

Hunting must be prohibited. First executing a creature, for instance a deer, isn’t about slaughtering a human. People have far a larger number of feelings than wild creatures and we are more brilliant than the normal bear. Not one creature is more astute than us. Likewise, creatures simply follow their nature. In contrast to people, they don’t have a clue about any superior to discovering nourishment, recreating, and running from predators. Blamelessness is only a word made to incite feelings of delicacy and “they don’t have the foggiest idea about any better.”

Hunting is legitimate, and ought to stay that way. Numerous contentions on the no side say we reserve no privilege to take a creatures life. I oppose this idea. One of the significant contentions individuals have against chasing is that we reserve no option to mediate with nature. Since we are a piece of this planet, we are a piece of the biological system we live in. You might want to click here if you want to know more. We are predators and predators chase different creatures. The Mountain Lion chases the deer. Is the Mountain Lion underhanded on the grounds that it is attempting to endure? No. The Mountain Lion is simply satisfying its obligation as predator by getting the number of inhabitants in deer far from the environments conveying limit (The populace at which a biological system can bolster no more). We should do the equivalent since we have been given the job of the predator. In different contentions individuals state it is unscrupulous to chase, and trackers simply prefer to murder creatures and take lives. On the off chance that this were valid, at that point trackers would go to a nearby steers ranch, approach a dairy animals, and blow its head off (Please pardon the realistic depiction). The truth of the matter is the satisfaction in the chase doesn’t originate from the execute, it originates from the test of following the deer, staying inconspicuous, and utilizing each outside aptitude required for a fruitful chase. A well known explanation against chasing is the creatures perspective. Consider it if our circumstances were switched. The creature that you chase, given the opportunity, would kill you without the slightest hesitation to endure and live.

The Transportation System And Politics

A motorbike is one of the forms of transportation in the society which is  usually  for personal use. Hitch carriers for motorcycles are, without question, a very safe method of bringing your motorbikes with you wherever you go as it also provides a hassle-free loading and unloading a motorbike.

Regardless of the form of transportation, it cannot be separated from society as it has become part of it. It presents a very close connection to the lifestyle of people, the scope and location of events and activities as well as the services and goods which would be for consumption. Developments in the transport system has made feasible changes in the manner of living as well as the way societies are structured and so have a considerable influence in the progress of civilizations.

Our world is separated into several political entities which are founded for reciprocated protection, economic gains as well as the growth of common culture. The industry of transportation performs an imperative part in the functioning and performance of such political entities.

Management of an Area

An area’s government must have the capacity to disseminate as well as obtain info to and about its constituents. It may embrace laws and directives to be abided by, safety and other info considered necessary to create awareness. An effective and capable administration depends principally on how the government could effectually communicate these knowledge and information to the entire country. But, with the dawn of communications, its significance is to some extent reduced.

Political Selections in Transport

These preferences may be categorized as communication, travel of individuals, movement of cargo or freight as well as military movement. The principal function or purpose of transportation is the transmission of info and messages. Moreover, it is required for quick movement of the military in the event of an emergency and lastly movement of people and goods and commodities. The political choice of constructing and maintaining roads has brought about the development and advancement of the system of transportation.

The transport system is responsible for the growth and progress of civilizations even during the olden times by means of fulfilling the peoples’ travel needs as well as the transport needs of services and goods. This kind of movement has transformed the way individuals in the society travel and live. In nations that are developed and still developing, a huge portion of the population travel on a regular basis for whatever purpose, such as work, grocery shopping and societal reasons. However, transport likewise consumes so much resources such as fuel, materials, land and time.

The Politician: A Quick Review

Netflix on Smart TV

The Politician isn’t really a series — not — but coworkers and Ryan Murphy has not ceased from providing exactly the sort of claims we are utilized to hearing.

When we heard the Glee and American Horror Story founder had filmed a multi-million-dollar cope with Netflix, hopes were too high, along with also the very first trailer for Your Politician did not disappoint.

Read Also: Influencing People With Political Films

Check. Camp stylings? You have it. Jessica Lange in another scene-stealing functionality?

Sad to say, the effort of the show was too powerful, setting up season one of those Politician. In the tender age of seven, Payton Hobart has ever wished to be the President of the USA, and that he’s a grownup, his very first step towards true strength can be found in the race to student-body president.

Payton’s lifetime of privilege appears to put him up to get a certain win before his competitor, the stunningly handsome River, falls out, pitting his group contrary to River’s girlfriend, Astrid.

That sounds great in concept and sometimes it is fun to see a throw into their mid-20s have a college effort so badly. The Wes Anderson-style background does not hurt. Between the stomach along with the mansions, The Politician looks the part. But do not they?

Under all that sparkle and surplus, you may not be amazed to hear the Politician does not have a lot to say. It is 1 thing never to participate with the fact of politics from the world that is actual, but it is another to battle.

Component of this comes to the display’s loose scripting. Early, Payton worries he is a sociopath, but he is far from the only man out of tune. Gwyneth Paltrow is deadpan during as Payton’s mom Georgina, however it is difficult to feel she cares for anybody besides her favorite kid, which comes with her secret lesbian lover.

American Flag

As you may anticipate, Jessica Lange naturally brings attention on Dusty Jackson — a personality who would not feel strange in Western Horror Story — but even her connection with all granddaughter Infinity Jackson pales compared to Hulu’s series, The Act, that followed a very similar narrative.

Aside from Payton himself lacks charisma’s sort you could expect. Devotion is not a character trait, and the authors would be wise to bear in mind that.

His personality seems to fight that Payton clearly lacks, and it is difficult not to imagine how much better the time could have been when he hadn’t been sidelined by the authors early on.

Saying, nothing about one of these characters feels real, and while that may be a very meta approach to tackle how folks perceive politics from the public world, in addition, it makes for what could be a horizontal viewing experience.

One exception for this is based with a peculiar mid-season interlude which mimicked the major cast in favor of a random pupil and his reply to the election. It’s quite telling that he ends up becoming among the characters in the series.

The exact same could be stated to Judith Light along with Bette Midler, two seasoned actors who greatly boost the display’s quality when they are eventually introduced at the season 1 finale.

As is frequently true for Ryan Murphy reveals, The Politician quickly loses attention as the year advances, but despite all its failings, year one remains amazingly watchable (loving this while searching for the best soundbars you can buy in 2020).

Fans of Scream Queens will love Murphy’s most up-to-date camp festival for most of its snarky dark comedy, and it is inspirational to watch LGBTQ representation jaded by the authors so kindly here.

The strategy has ever been to accompany Payton’s trip into the White House through new period jumps every year, and fortunately, there is only enough of the fantastic stuff from the initial run to warrant another election.

Nevertheless, it is rather fitting the Politician delivers this kind of hollow experience since the official tagline reads: “We guarantee to assure everything.”

Political Communication – YouTube Responds to the Challenge of Becoming a Responsible Social Media Platform

Political institutions encompass not only parties of political candidates seeking for government positions. They also include advocacy organizations pushing for reforms and activists seeking for equality and justice. Now more than ever, social media can provide the most effective channel in which political institutions can deliver their political communication.

There is no shortage of social media platforms in which to communicate ideas, but if for purposes of delivering political messages, Facebook, Twitter and YouTube have become the frontrunners in the array of choices. Yet Twitter is out of the picture as far as political ads are concerned, as Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey prefers promoting political endorsements that garner organic support.

Facebook, albeit leading as a social media platform, suffers from trust issues; given the data breach scandals particularly the Cambridge Analytica case that revealed how Trump’s digital campaign team manipulated FB user accounts in advancing Trump’s political campaign.

Google’s YouTube therefore has become an important Internet marketing space where political institutions can put forward their political communication. Given YouTube’s current ranking as the next largest search engine on a global scale, and its present count of 2 billion active users, the largest video-sharing social media platform has evolved into becoming a major source of political and social information.

It does not come as a surprise at all, why there was a mad scramble among political campaign teams when Google announced the activation of a new advertising app called “Instant Reserve.” The software gives political institutions, tools that enable them to buy and reserve advertising slots in advance. At the same time, they can customize their political advertisement according to their budget, as well as program them to appear in geolocations where the ads will be most timely and relevant.

In addition, Google and its YouTube platform made certain policy changes that aim to avoid committing Facebook’s political advertising errors in the 2016 presidential elections.

Google/YouTube’s New Ad-Targeting Policies

Political adverts appearing in Google and YouTube will have to tailor-fit their advertisement around the age, gender and postcode of their target audience. This denotes that publishers of advertising campaigns can not target voters based on the issues they either support or do not support (e.g. abortion, LGBTQ marriage, marijuana legalization.)

That being the case, uploading personal info data other than the aforementioned demographic factors to target specific sets of audience, is not allowed

Nonetheless, the Google and YouTube platforms will direct political advertisements to users who read and watch content related to specific issues occurring as published content.

The policy updates also address ads and content that aim to mislead voters by insinuating there is voter suppression, or by making unfounded claims that there is a breach in the integrity of the elections. Apparently, this update took into consideration the the slew of fake political news the discouraged millions of voters from going out and exercise their right to vote in the 2016 presidential election.

Understanding the Political and Election Advertising

The technology opens various opportunities to every individual, company, and businesses. Businesses, the marketing side,  benefit a lot from technology. More than three decades ago, a business’ product or service reach their target market through  television, radio, news paper advertisement and other printed advertisement. During that time, businesses find it really hard to reach a wider market the reach of platforms are limited.

On the other hand, marketing these days come in a lot of forms since digital advertising has become available. Since, a lot of people are spending most of their time on the internet, online advertising is the most preferred method of advertising. Google, the most powerful search engine for many years now, are being used by a lot of business to advertise their product or service. Moreover, in order to further utilize the technology, there are software that provides Adwords automation scripts. This will make use of automatic fixing of issues and bugs as well.

Truth in Political Advertising

Not only businesses benefit from this, but also individuals that need to promote their platforms. Politicians during elections make use of online advertising to reach the mass.

However, there are lots of problem and concerns from political advertising. The public’s concern on advertising in general is that not all advertisements tell the truth about a certain product/service. Almost all the time,  what they are telling are only the advantages of using the product. It does not tell for example, that the product will not work on people who have sensitive skin.

Similar in political advertising, it is not most of the time true and accurate.  Almost every one of us can attest to that through a politician that we voted because of his/her campaign but does nothing but to corrupt money from the government.

But if legally speaking, there is actually no law which states that all advertising content must be accurate and true to what it really offers. Hence, during elections, I personally think that politicians are showing false advertising just to manipulate that public on what they can do once they are elected on a certain position.

The lifestyle of a Politician

Why We Think that Majority of Politicians are Rich

In today’s society, we often think of politicians in high position as people who are very rich – has huge house, lots of high end cars, and luxurious lifestyle. While most of them live like that, there are still those who choose to live a simple yet meaningful life with their families. Basically, lifestyle varies from one politician to another. One of the reasons why we think like politicians are rich is because most of them really act like they are big time, even if that is not totally the case since most of them are only doing that for show and to intimidate people. Again, it is subjective.

For this article, we will explain the luxurious lifestyle of politicians, how their house looks like etc. However, we do not conclude that this is how most of them live. It still depends on them.

Politicians Home- every time we see a politician being interviewed on TV, we think “I bet he/she has a huge house”. Apparently yes. Of course politicians think that since they are public figure, their house should reflect their status.

From the curtains, sofa, pillow, and even mattresses from https://www.sleepywill.com/, they make sure that all are in very high quality because price does not matter to them, right? It is a matter of quality.

A politician’s house has at least two floors. Some have three or four. Their thinking is that they want a huge family in the future so it is better to be prepared early.

Cars and other vehicles– this is a very important property of politicians because they are busy people and they go everywhere for a meeting, conference, and many more. Aside from an SUV which they use for travel, they also have at least one personal sedan car which they use for personal appointments and travel.

Basically the main reason why they choose this lifestyle because it has already been part of their every lives, especially travelling around the world. And since they make easy money, they tend to buy most of the things they want.

Whistleblower’s Complaint vs Trump : Current Speculations Point to Trump’s Bullying of Ukrainian President

Last week, the news media stream was full of reports about an alleged intelligence officer blowing the whistle on U.S. president Trump. The complaint contained allegations about Trump’s disturbing conduct in connection with several phone conversations held with a foreign leader.

The Washington Post was the first to carry the whistle-blowing incident, but which to date, still has vague details. As it turned out, the National Intelligence Director to whom the complaint was submitted chose to bring the matter to Trump, instead of bringing it to Congress as required by legal whistle-blowing procedures.

Speculations about the Details of the Whistleblower’s Complaint

The different major news outlets have pieced together bits and pieces of information on events that led to the whistle-blowing complaint filed by the intelligence officer.

On all points of view, the alleged misconduct is in connection with Trump’s widely publicized action of pressuring the newly-elected president of Ukraine to gather evidence aimed at smearing Joe Biden. That is because former vice-president Biden has been leading polls that suggest he will be the Democratic candidate most likely to face Trump in the 2020 presidential elections.

Who is the whistleblower?

Some are looking to either former Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats, who resigned last July 2019, or to Susan Gordon, the former Principal Deputy Director of National Intelligence, who also resigned a month after.

According to The Times, Coats resigned not only because the Trump administration continued to water down his warnings about Russian activities that pose threats to U.S. national security. The former intelligence director’s greater grievance is that the White House altered certain sections in Coats’ dossier about Russia’s interference in the 2018 midterm elections. The purpose of which was to make certain information stated therein, appear less critical.

Susan Gordon, on the other hand, submitted her handwritten resignation to Trump, on August 2019, which read

“I offer this letter as an act of respect and patriotism, not preference. You should have your team,”

Thereafter, Trump replaced the two intelligence officers with known Trump loyalists, including the new intelligence director who did not submit the whistleblower’s complaint to Congress.

What “Promise” Could be Disturbing Enough to Move an Intelligence Officer to Blow the Whistle?

In continuing with the speculations, the question of to whom Trump’s “promise” was made remains a mystery. Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky, a former comedian before he was elected president by majority of the Ukrainians, seems a likely candidate. He is known to have tread cautiously to avoid provoking Trump, lest the latter makes good on his threat to suspend the $250 million military aid that Congress appropriated for Ukraine. The financial aid is meant to help the country ward off Russia’s military might.

Zelensky’s first show of cooperation was when it halted any participation or involvement in Special Counsel Mueller’s investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential elections. This denotes that even before Congress approved the $250 million military aid, the Ukrainian president was already in direct communication with the White House

In August, 2019 it was reported that Trump was delaying the release of the Ukraine military aid. After questions about the slow delivery were raised by both Congressional Republicans and Democrats, Trump finally approved the release in mid-September, a week before the news of the intelligence whistleblower’s complaint blew up.

However, the latest Washington Post update said that according to the whistleblower, there was no mention of military aid during the conversation.

Frankly, unless Congress sheds light to this by way of a hearing, no one knows the exact reasons that moved an intelligence officer to finally blow the whistle on Trump.

Technology And Politics Are Endlessly Interlinked

As soon as tech advancements have rocketed, numerous and various forms of technologies have been developed and are continuously being improved. For instance, if you check out https://fanguider.com/the-best-smartwatches/, you would see how much watches have changed since the first appearance of mechanical pocket watches in the late 19th century. Today, smartwatches aren’t only used to tell time. Many other features are incorporated in these smartwatches such as a health and fitness tracker and a music player.

The Gap Between Politics and Technology

Because of the “success” of technology, politicians as well as technology executives have expended more than a year discussing and deliberating the appropriate function for regulators in the industry of technology, wherein has taken on an immense impact over the economy of the Unites States. Nonetheless, whether we agree or not, politics and technology are and will remain interlinked.

The impact of social media on the result of the US election in 2016 has been talked and argued about so much, and with Mark Zuckerberg facing the Senate to give his testament concerning the Cambridge Analytica data scandal, one does not have to search farther to tell how the government and progress have brought into being a kind of digital split or divide.

Unfortunately, the struggle has left individuals estranged as well as aggravated. A complete intervention between technology and politics is needed, otherwise they’re fated to be running around in circles.

Connecting the Digital Split

In due course, technology will require a new and different approach towards politics and this goes the same way with politicians towards technology. So far, technology has been a challenge that is immense for politics since politicians are only mostly concentrated on technologies’ short-term impacts.

This digital split or divide is something that is existent and unquestionable. However, to mend this divide, it will have to take more than social media or developing apps. Politicians will also have to see beyond short-term impacts and consider long-term benefits of technology as well. Both must in some way must work together to make certain that they don’t overlap or over-influence each other. It may take quite some time for this divide to be bridged, but it doesn’t mean it isn’t possible.

Trump Approval Ratings from Fellow GOP, Not a Sound Basis for Predicting Outcomes of 2020 Elections

Customary of news coming from U.S. president Donald Trump, he is currently spreading information that his approval ratings went up after targeting Congress’ 4 women-of color. The statement is partly true, but that went without clarifying that the approval came mostly from Republican supporters and not from a larger number of voters representing the country.

A new poll by USA Today showed that 57% of Republican voters agree that Trump’s verbal tirade against the four Congresswomen collectively referred to as The Squad, was not racist. However, in the latest CBS poll on an overall scale, 59% of the American voters polled, do not approve of Trump’s racist remarks, leaving 40 % who signified approval.

On a party level, 93% percent of Democrats and 68% percent of those supporting independents, regard Trump’s racist tweets as offensive, while among Republicans, only 37% held the same stance.

The latest party-level polls clearly indicate that there exists a partisan divide. Yet in a country in which the number of non-white population can have a significant impact in the 2020 presidential elections, their force is fast becoming a factor to consider. Racist tweets and “send her back” chants against lawmakers-of -color can surely influence the votes of a large demographic of non-white Americans.

In fact, Republican members who are aware of this, are trying to distance themselves from Trump’s racial slurs. Most of them come from American states in which the majority already consists of the so-called minority groups.

West Texas Republican Representative Will Hurd, the only black Republican in the Lower House and one of four GOP members who sided with House Democrats in condemning Trump’s racist tweets said.

”The tweets were not only racist, but they are also bad politics.”

American States in which Minorities Now Represent Majority of the Population

In stressing the impact of states with large numbers of minority voters, analysis of the July 2018 US census is currently showing projections that in less than a quarter century, white people will eventually make up the minority. The forecast is that around 70% of today’s population will see that happen during their lifetime.

In five American states, namely California, Hawaii, District of Columbia, New Mexico and Texas, the shift from minority-majority has already taken place. According to the projections, the tipping point of the shift to minority-majority across the country, could occur just in time for the 2020 presidential elections. That is because many among the minority groups will turn 18 years old on the said year. As an example, below is the:

Latest U.S. Census Estimates of Texas’ Minority-Majority

  • 41.5% – White Alone
  • 39.6% – Hispanic or Latino
  • 12.8% – African American
  • 5% – Asian
𐌢